I did not attack disabled people. If you will read what I wrote instead of inventing stuff, you would see that I attacked people who pretended to be disabled. I do not get frothy at anyone who is "disadvantaged" and you can't point to a single time where I have done so, because I never have. I get frothy at scammers and whiners. Big difference.rEvolutionist wrote:You are a bigot because you attack disabled people and generally get frothy about anyone who is disadvantaged, like the obvious conservative you are. And my personal attack was most certainly not unprovoked. How stupid do you think we are? When the fuck are you going to man up for the shithouse things you say? You are a big fucking skirt. And by the sounds of your wife, I bet you hide behind her when an argument gets heated. Man up.Coito ergo sum wrote:Unprovoked personal attack. Look, there are scumbags who scam the system. Just because you want to pretend they don't exist doesn't make me a bigot.rEvolutionist wrote:You really are a bigoted cuntbag. I'd seriously smash your fucking face in if I ever saw you in person.Coito ergo sum wrote:And, as far as irrational people go, and overly emotional people go, they seem to cut across lines. A lot of them are scumbags who sit home collecting the dole doing nothing and complaining about the injustice of the world while feigning "disabilities."
i'm sick of your garbage. Go fuck off, why don't you?
Look at the shit you say about conservatives. You "hate" them. You make stereotypical generalizations all the time. And, you claim I'm a bigot because I oppose people who scam the system? Fuck the fuck off.
Who is "we?" Who do you claim to speak for?
I'm not getting dragged into your own issues again. Grow up, you're acting like a child.
I didn't attack people with disabilities. I referred to people who aren't disabled, but pretend to be.rEvolutionist wrote:
Regarding me attacking conservatives, they are that way by choice. UNLIKE people with disabilities and a lot of poor people. You are a scumbag of the lowest kind. I actually hope I get to meet you one day.
This is not the first time you've made physical threats to me. That's a crime.
Even if Ayaan's 1% figure was correct, based on the cost of the food stamp program of $92 billion, we'd have nearly a billion dollars in fraud and theft. Other figures show a much higher rate of abuse, though.rEvolutionist wrote:So you keep saying, shock jock style. Where's your evidence that shows that it is "rife"? And what sorts of money are we talking about here? How does that level of money stack up to the trillions stuffed offshore by the rich in tax havens? How does it stack up to the disaster that some financial organisations have reeked on individuals and the whole fucking economy?You have no idea what you're talking about. It's not a small percentage that scam the food stamp system in the US. The system is rife with abuse, both in fraudulent applications and misuse of the funds once they're received.rEvolutionist wrote:Did you read what I wrote? No you didn't. Just like you never do. As i said, I don't have a problem with a tiny percentage of poor people skimming the system. The real problems in society are at the top end. No poor person gets judged for trying to survive a little better while ever the real thieves in society get away with their theft unpunished (or insufficiently punished).So, I'm against food stamp theft and fraud. Aren't you? Can we agree on that?
Oh, a billion dollars is not at the level of what the criminal banking organizations did during the financial crisis, and what they've done over the years. A big problem there is that the government regulatory bodies did not take appropriate criminal action against those entities. Instead, they were propped up and bailed out. However, this thread is not about them, nor is food stamp fraud's impropriety a function of a relative comparison with financial fraud.
It is not, and so what if it was? Fuck off. This forum is not about personally attacking conservatives, or libertarians, or liberals or leftists or communists or whatever. You are not some privileged member who gets to fly off the handle at anyone you choose just because you don't like their politics, or what you label their politics.rEvolutionist wrote:[
Your narrative on the board is conservative to the core. Attack the poor and disadvantaged out of proportion to the way you attack the rich(er). I don't know who you think you are kidding. Everyone knows you are a conservative. How many people do you need to tell you that you are one before you man up and just admit that you are one?And, you're the one who falsely accused me of not caring if rich people scam the system. I do, yet you constantly pretend that I don't. This thread is not about the rich people scamming the system. This is about the food stamp system.
I am not a conservative because I am pro-choice, pro-gay rights, pro civil rights, anti-death penalty, pro-regulations against monopolies and anticompetitive behavior, pro-reasonable gun regulation, pro regulated market system, pro-embryonic stem cell research, pro-physician assisted suicide, I accept climate science, I am against racial profiling in all forms, I am pro-immigration, and pro separation of church and state. There are very few issues on which I can be characterized as "conservative."
I wasn't aware that being against fraud, theft and scamming the system was a uniquely "conservative" value anyway. Maybe it is where you live. Or, maybe that issue just hits a little too close to home for you because you may be attributing something here as an accurate portrayal of your own life experience. I can't be sure, but the fact that you've gone so far off the deep end on this seems quite odd, to say the least.