-
tattuchu
- a dickload of cocks
- Posts: 21890
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 2:59 pm
- About me: I'm having trouble with the trolley.
- Location: Marmite-upon-Toast, Wankershire
-
Contact:
Post
by tattuchu » Thu Sep 19, 2013 3:17 pm
Public masturbators in Sweden now may be able to get off without charges.
A recent court ruling in Sweden's Södertörn District Court suggests that masturbating on the beach in Sweden is "OK," according to public prosecutor Olof Vrethammar.
Vrethammar was prosecuting a 65-year-old who was charged with sexual assault after getting literally caught with his pants down in June, giving himself a sandy handy on a the Drevviken beach in Stockholm, according to The Local's translation of the Swedish newspaper Mitti.
A ruling which acquitted the man of the sex assault charges this week found that although the he was publicly masturbating, he was not directing his actions at anyone in particular, according to the Local. This was enough to clear him of the sexual assault charge, though it's unclear if the action is still in violation of other statutes in Sweden.
"With that [ruling]," prosecutor Vrethammar told the Mitti, "we can conclude that it is OK to masturbate on the beach... [although] the act may be considered to be disorderly conduct."
More:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/1 ... 49742.html
I dunno, it's a bit of a stretch to say public masturbation is okay based on this ruling. He was acquitted of sexual assault is all. Why was he charged with sexual assault? The only person he was assaulting was himself

People think "queue" is just "q" followed by 4 silent letters.
But those letters are not silent.
They're just waiting their turn.
-
laklak
- Posts: 21022
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:07 pm
- About me: My preferred pronoun is "Massah"
- Location: Tannhauser Gate
-
Contact:
Post
by laklak » Thu Sep 19, 2013 3:20 pm
Christ I hope it doesn't catch on around here. There are already enough reasons not to go to the beach, what with the screaming children kicking sand about and enormous landwhales in bikinis. All we need is some doddering old perv flogging his limp dolphin.
Yeah well that's just, like, your opinion, man.
-
mistermack
- Posts: 15093
- Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:57 am
- About me: Never rong.
-
Contact:
Post
by mistermack » Thu Sep 19, 2013 3:51 pm
I'm surprised that he wasn't charged with rape.
I'm not at all surprised that he was charged with sexual assault.
It's the national joke in Sweden, '' that's rape in Sweden ''. Virtually anything qualifies as rape or sexual assault.
Hence the Julian Assange fiasco. The country is a laughing stock, in Sweden. The only people who don't see the joke, are the Swedish police and prosecutors. Wankers.
Although this ruling might mean that a bit of common sense is beginning to surface.
While there is a market for shit, there will be assholes to supply it.
-
Svartalf
- Offensive Grail Keeper
- Posts: 41185
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: Paris France
-
Contact:
Post
by Svartalf » Thu Sep 19, 2013 3:54 pm
Don't the Swedes have laws against indecent exposure that the guy would be charged with sexual assault, which clearly doesn't fit the situation?
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
-
Xamonas Chegwé
- Bouncer

- Posts: 50939
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:23 pm
- About me: I have prehensile eyebrows.
I speak 9 languages fluently, one of which other people can also speak.
When backed into a corner, I fit perfectly - having a right-angled arse.
- Location: Nottingham UK
-
Contact:
Post
by Xamonas Chegwé » Thu Sep 19, 2013 4:02 pm
tattuchu wrote:
I dunno, it's a bit of a stretch to say public masturbation is okay based on this ruling. He was acquitted of sexual assault is all. Why was he charged with sexual assault? The only person he was assaulting was himself

That's easy for you to say. It's all good clean fun till somebody gets an eyeful!

A book is a version of the world. If you do not like it, ignore it; or offer your own version in return.
Salman Rushdie
You talk to God, you're religious. God talks to you, you're psychotic.
House MD
Who needs a meaning anyway, I'd settle anyday for a very fine view.
Sandy Denny
This is the wrong forum for bluffing 
Paco
Yes, yes. But first I need to show you this venomous fish!
Calilasseia
I think we should do whatever Pawiz wants.
Twoflower
Bella squats momentarily then waddles on still peeing, like a horse
Millefleur
-
Coito ergo sum
- Posts: 32040
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
-
Contact:
Post
by Coito ergo sum » Thu Sep 19, 2013 4:12 pm
mistermack wrote:I'm surprised that he wasn't charged with rape.
I'm not at all surprised that he was charged with sexual assault.
It's the national joke in Sweden, '' that's rape in Sweden ''. Virtually anything qualifies as rape or sexual assault.
Hence the Julian Assange fiasco. The country is a laughing stock, in Sweden. The only people who don't see the joke, are the Swedish police and prosecutors. Wankers.
Although this ruling might mean that a bit of common sense is beginning to surface.
Majority rules. You should support it. They're just adopting the policy that they as a people want, and they see it as protecting vulnerable people.
-
mistermack
- Posts: 15093
- Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:57 am
- About me: Never rong.
-
Contact:
Post
by mistermack » Thu Sep 19, 2013 4:28 pm
While there is a market for shit, there will be assholes to supply it.
-
Coito ergo sum
- Posts: 32040
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
-
Contact:
Post
by Coito ergo sum » Thu Sep 19, 2013 4:33 pm
They probably even want to restrict people's peaceful speech and protest rights....
I'm surprised you're not in favor of the urination law -- - the practice decreases the likelihood of puddles and other unwanted residue forming in the stall -- in addition to being better for a man's health by more effectively emptying one's bladder. It's a health issue.

-
MiM
- Man In The Middle
- Posts: 5459
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 10:07 pm
- Location: Finland
-
Contact:
Post
by MiM » Thu Sep 19, 2013 4:37 pm
Svartalf wrote:Don't the Swedes have laws against indecent exposure that the guy would be charged with sexual assault, which clearly doesn't fit the situation?
Don't know about that precisely, but "offensive conduct", they do have. Would have fit much better.
The first principle is that you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool - Richard Feynman
-
Tero
- Just saying
- Posts: 51716
- Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
- About me: 8-34-20
- Location: USA
-
Contact:
Post
by Tero » Thu Sep 19, 2013 4:44 pm
Ah, I was confused about "get off". Masturbators usually get off. That is the point.

-
klr
- (%gibber(who=klr, what=Leprageek);)
- Posts: 32964
- Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 1:25 pm
- About me: The money was just resting in my account.
- Location: Airstrip Two
-
Contact:
Post
by klr » Thu Sep 19, 2013 7:32 pm
tattuchu wrote:
...
I dunno, it's a bit of a stretch to say public masturbation is okay based on this ruling. He was acquitted of sexual assault is all.
Why was he charged with sexual assault? The only person he was assaulting was himself

Probably because of a lack of anything more suitable on the statute books. "This looks wrong, what can we charge him with?"
God has no place within these walls, just like facts have no place within organized religion. - Superintendent Chalmers
It's not up to us to choose which laws we want to obey. If it were, I'd kill everyone who looked at me cock-eyed! - Rex Banner
The Bluebird of Happiness long absent from his life, Ned is visited by the Chicken of Depression. - Gary Larson

-
mistermack
- Posts: 15093
- Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:57 am
- About me: Never rong.
-
Contact:
Post
by mistermack » Thu Sep 19, 2013 7:40 pm
klr wrote:tattuchu wrote:
...
I dunno, it's a bit of a stretch to say public masturbation is okay based on this ruling. He was acquitted of sexual assault is all.
Why was he charged with sexual assault? The only person he was assaulting was himself

Probably because of a lack of anything more suitable on the statute books. "This looks wrong, what can we charge him with?"
That would be surprising though. I doubt if this is the first time someone got his todger out in public. There must be something, apart from sexual assault.
I think, in Britain, they can choose from outraging public decency and indecent exposure.
While there is a market for shit, there will be assholes to supply it.
-
SteveB
- Nibbler
- Posts: 7506
- Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 6:38 am
- About me: The more you change the less you feel
- Location: Potsville, BC, Canada
-
Contact:
Post
by SteveB » Fri Sep 20, 2013 3:22 am
The judge is a gavel-banger, so I'd assume he would get the masturbator off.
Twit, twat,
twaddle.
hadespussercats wrote:I've been de-sigged!

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 30 guests