Attenborough Says Starve 'Em Down?

User avatar
rainbow
Posts: 13767
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2012 8:10 am
About me: Egal wie dicht du bist, Goethe war Dichter
Where ever you are, Goethe was a Poet.
Location: Africa
Contact:

Re: Attenborough Says Starve 'Em Down?

Post by rainbow » Thu Sep 19, 2013 1:15 pm

Tyrannical wrote:
Pappa wrote:
PsychoSerenity wrote:There is certainly a valid argument to be made that human population could significantly increase perfectly comfortably with appropriate use of technology. Unfortunately it can't really be made until we have the political will to make sure resources are used sustainably and distributed effectively throughout the world.
I read something a while back (I forget where) about a study into farming practices in Africa. The gist was that even very small improvements in technique would likely increase food production by a huge amount.
It's true that very poor farming practices curtail African food production. Very little of the land is even irrigated. But the problem with Africa is like leading a horse to water but you can't make it drink. Rhodesia was once called the bread basket of Africa with it's modern Westernized farms, but once Black rule took over the farms were raided and destroyed. Irrigation pipes were dug up for scrap metal, milk and egg production stopped because they ate the cows and chickens. White farmers were chased out and their farms given to Blacks who simply were unable or willing to farm.

Africa has only one potential hope, and that is repatriating Western educated Blacks back to Africa. Especially the most skilled or educated amongst them. Africa needs to be fixed from within, with people familiar with Western advances to live in and integrate into their society. This is not possible unless they are also Black because visiting White or Asian aid workers have already failed at this.
Now it's easy to think that Tyrannical just wants to kick 40M Blacks out of the US, but you can't argue with how much of a positive effect that would have for Black Africa. It could be the jump start they need to reach the 21st century.
You know nothing about Africa, or Africans.

How about you talk about what you know about, like public masturbation?
I call bullshit - Alfred E Einstein
BArF−4

User avatar
Tyrannical
Posts: 6468
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:59 am
Contact:

Re: Attenborough Says Starve 'Em Down?

Post by Tyrannical » Thu Sep 19, 2013 1:37 pm

Well enlighten me then Rainbow, what is your solution for this upcoming African problem?

Perhaps you think the problem will just work its self out, with a decline in fertility and increase in food production as modern techniques are adopted? It's certainly a possible scenario as Africa could feed vast amounts of people with better farming techniques. China has 1.2 Billion people and can feed it self, and Sub-Saharan Africa has more potential arable land than China.

Image
A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.

User avatar
Pappa
Non-Practicing Anarchist
Non-Practicing Anarchist
Posts: 56488
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:42 am
About me: I am sacrificing a turnip as I type.
Location: Le sud du Pays de Galles.
Contact:

Re: Attenborough Says Starve 'Em Down?

Post by Pappa » Thu Sep 19, 2013 2:57 pm

Tyrannical wrote:
Pappa wrote:
PsychoSerenity wrote:There is certainly a valid argument to be made that human population could significantly increase perfectly comfortably with appropriate use of technology. Unfortunately it can't really be made until we have the political will to make sure resources are used sustainably and distributed effectively throughout the world.
I read something a while back (I forget where) about a study into farming practices in Africa. The gist was that even very small improvements in technique would likely increase food production by a huge amount.
It's true that very poor farming practices curtail African food production. Very little of the land is even irrigated. But the problem with Africa is like leading a horse to water but you can't make it drink. Rhodesia was once called the bread basket of Africa with it's modern Westernized farms, but once Black rule took over the farms were raided and destroyed. Irrigation pipes were dug up for scrap metal, milk and egg production stopped because they ate the cows and chickens. White farmers were chased out and their farms given to Blacks who simply were unable or willing to farm.

Africa has only one potential hope, and that is repatriating Western educated Blacks back to Africa. Especially the most skilled or educated amongst them. Africa needs to be fixed from within, with people familiar with Western advances to live in and integrate into their society. This is not possible unless they are also Black because visiting White or Asian aid workers have already failed at this.
Now it's easy to think that Tyrannical just wants to kick 40M Blacks out of the US, but you can't argue with how much of a positive effect that would have for Black Africa. It could be the jump start they need to reach the 21st century.
Oh what utter bollocks. You're talking as if Africa lacks educated people. They don't all still live in mud huts, you know?

User avatar
Tyrannical
Posts: 6468
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:59 am
Contact:

Re: Attenborough Says Starve 'Em Down?

Post by Tyrannical » Thu Sep 19, 2013 3:24 pm

papa wrote:Oh what utter bollocks. You're talking as if Africa lacks educated people. They don't all still live in mud huts, you know?
It's not so much a question of educated knowledge as it is culture when I mention Western educated Blacks. It's true there does exist an educated class in Black Africa. and not all of them live in stone age poverty. But African prosperity follows a feudalistic form of government where the ruler and his extended family group live large while the rest trickles down. What does Mandela, Mugabe,and Zuma have in common? All of their extended families became incredibly rich mysteriously once their patriarch took power. Westernized Blacks without those tribal ties could do what no Black African could.
A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.

User avatar
cronus
Black Market Analyst
Posts: 18122
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2012 7:09 pm
About me: Illis quos amo deserviam
Location: United Kingdom
Contact:

Re: Attenborough Says Starve 'Em Down?

Post by cronus » Thu Sep 19, 2013 3:28 pm

Tyrannical wrote:
papa wrote:Oh what utter bollocks. You're talking as if Africa lacks educated people. They don't all still live in mud huts, you know?
It's not so much a question of educated knowledge as it is culture when I mention Western educated Blacks. It's true there does exist an educated class in Black Africa. and not all of them live in stone age poverty. But African prosperity follows a feudalistic form of government where the ruler and his extended family group live large while the rest trickles down. What does Mandela, Mugabe,and Zuma have in common? All of their extended families became incredibly rich mysteriously once their patriarch took power. Westernized Blacks without those tribal ties could do what no Black African could.
You may be right. The reality is each generation needs new blood. Without operation paperclip and the help of the Germans after WW2 the US would have sank into oblivion far sooner. :read:
What will the world be like after its ruler is removed?

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41068
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: Attenborough Says Starve 'Em Down?

Post by Svartalf » Thu Sep 19, 2013 3:47 pm

mistermack wrote:Yeh, Attenborough is just stating the bleeding obvious. But as he says, nobody else seems to be pointing it out.

Food aid IS self defeating. Education aid would have more point. But supplying birth control aid and education would be most relevant. Or provide legal funds to sue the catholic church, to force them to support all the extra children that they've created.
Next question is how to reverse the desertification in the Sahel and similar regions where famine comes from overexploitation and overgrazing that turns a formerly reasonably fertile area into a barren wasteland... and if we can't reverse that, where do we put the locals so they can feed themselves?
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
charlou
arseist
Posts: 32530
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:36 am

Re: Attenborough Says Starve 'Em Down?

Post by charlou » Thu Sep 19, 2013 4:34 pm

Svartalf wrote:
mistermack wrote:Yeh, Attenborough is just stating the bleeding obvious. But as he says, nobody else seems to be pointing it out.

Food aid IS self defeating. Education aid would have more point. But supplying birth control aid and education would be most relevant. Or provide legal funds to sue the catholic church, to force them to support all the extra children that they've created.
Next question is how to reverse the desertification in the Sahel and similar regions where famine comes from overexploitation and overgrazing that turns a formerly reasonably fertile area into a barren wasteland... and if we can't reverse that, where do we put the locals so they can feed themselves?
In the too hard basket.
no fences

User avatar
laklak
Posts: 21022
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:07 pm
About me: My preferred pronoun is "Massah"
Location: Tannhauser Gate
Contact:

Re: Attenborough Says Starve 'Em Down?

Post by laklak » Thu Sep 19, 2013 4:40 pm

Does anyone disagree with Tyr's analysis of Zimbabwe?
Yeah well that's just, like, your opinion, man.

User avatar
mistermack
Posts: 15093
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:57 am
About me: Never rong.
Contact:

Re: Attenborough Says Starve 'Em Down?

Post by mistermack » Thu Sep 19, 2013 4:48 pm

Svartalf wrote:
mistermack wrote:Yeh, Attenborough is just stating the bleeding obvious. But as he says, nobody else seems to be pointing it out.

Food aid IS self defeating. Education aid would have more point. But supplying birth control aid and education would be most relevant. Or provide legal funds to sue the catholic church, to force them to support all the extra children that they've created.
Next question is how to reverse the desertification in the Sahel and similar regions where famine comes from overexploitation and overgrazing that turns a formerly reasonably fertile area into a barren wasteland... and if we can't reverse that, where do we put the locals so they can feed themselves?
Well, overgrazing and overexploitation stems from too-fast population growth. So the answer is always the same.
Start with free family planning products for all, and a family planning education program.
Until you've done that successfully, you are just pissing in the wind. I wouldn't spend a penny on anything else, till everyone had full access to the products and the education.

I would also outlaw preaching against contraception. With massive fines on the churches if they persevered.
I would do that everywhere, not just poor countries.
While there is a market for shit, there will be assholes to supply it.

User avatar
Pappa
Non-Practicing Anarchist
Non-Practicing Anarchist
Posts: 56488
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:42 am
About me: I am sacrificing a turnip as I type.
Location: Le sud du Pays de Galles.
Contact:

Re: Attenborough Says Starve 'Em Down?

Post by Pappa » Thu Sep 19, 2013 4:51 pm

laklak wrote:Does anyone disagree with Tyr's analysis of Zimbabwe?
Not me. That's pretty much as it was reported by the news outlets here.

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41068
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: Attenborough Says Starve 'Em Down?

Post by Svartalf » Thu Sep 19, 2013 4:54 pm

Thanxalot Mugabe, from breadbasket to famine land, all thanx to you.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
jaydot
Posts: 279
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2010 10:16 pm
Contact:

Re: Attenborough Says Starve 'Em Down?

Post by jaydot » Thu Sep 19, 2013 9:40 pm

Audley Strange wrote:Necessity is the mother of invention. We'll do nothing until it's necessary.
as ever, succinct, apposite, probably correct.
open source the world.

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74201
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Attenborough Says Starve 'Em Down?

Post by JimC » Thu Sep 19, 2013 10:05 pm

Pappa wrote:
laklak wrote:Does anyone disagree with Tyr's analysis of Zimbabwe?
Not me. That's pretty much as it was reported by the news outlets here.
Except that Tyr's analysis was basically that the outcome in Zimbabwe was due to sub-human intelligence of black people, where the real reasons involved involved nasty political machinations by a populist despot.
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
rainbow
Posts: 13767
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2012 8:10 am
About me: Egal wie dicht du bist, Goethe war Dichter
Where ever you are, Goethe was a Poet.
Location: Africa
Contact:

Re: Attenborough Says Starve 'Em Down?

Post by rainbow » Fri Sep 20, 2013 6:49 am

laklak wrote:Does anyone disagree with Tyr's analysis of Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe isn't Africa. It is a country in Africa.
Talking about Zimbabwe as being typical of Africa is the same as thinking that Nicaragua is a typical North American country, or that Moldova is a typical European country.

Please take some time to learn your geography and history.
I call bullshit - Alfred E Einstein
BArF−4

User avatar
rainbow
Posts: 13767
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2012 8:10 am
About me: Egal wie dicht du bist, Goethe war Dichter
Where ever you are, Goethe was a Poet.
Location: Africa
Contact:

Re: Attenborough Says Starve 'Em Down?

Post by rainbow » Fri Sep 20, 2013 6:58 am

Tyrannical wrote:Well enlighten me then Rainbow, what is your solution for this upcoming African problem?
First tell me what this "African problem" is. Africa has many different problems and they vary from region to region.
Different countries, you see.
Is this concept too difficult for you to grasp?
I call bullshit - Alfred E Einstein
BArF−4

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests