Mass Shooting at Washington Navy Yard

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Mass Shooting at Washington Navy Yard

Post by Coito ergo sum » Tue Sep 17, 2013 3:10 pm

Clinton Huxley wrote:
Coito ergo sum wrote:
Clinton Huxley wrote:Here you go, from the Torygraph :biggrin:

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/peter ... -gun-laws/
Well, if the telegraph says that US gun laws are notoriously lax, then the opposite must be true. :smoke:
I don't think even telegraph commentators are loony enough to argue otherwise. There's mad and then there's American gun law......
Can't trust the telegraph. If they're saying it, it's a lie.

User avatar
cronus
Black Market Analyst
Posts: 18122
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2012 7:09 pm
About me: Illis quos amo deserviam
Location: United Kingdom
Contact:

Re: Mass Shooting at Washington Navy Yard

Post by cronus » Tue Sep 17, 2013 3:15 pm

Coito ergo sum wrote:
Clinton Huxley wrote:
Coito ergo sum wrote:
Clinton Huxley wrote:Here you go, from the Torygraph :biggrin:

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/peter ... -gun-laws/
Well, if the telegraph says that US gun laws are notoriously lax, then the opposite must be true. :smoke:
I don't think even telegraph commentators are loony enough to argue otherwise. There's mad and then there's American gun law......
Can't trust the telegraph. If they're saying it, it's a lie.
:read:
What will the world be like after its ruler is removed?

User avatar
Clinton Huxley
19th century monkeybitch.
Posts: 23746
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:34 pm
Contact:

Re: Mass Shooting at Washington Navy Yard

Post by Clinton Huxley » Tue Sep 17, 2013 3:21 pm

"Lies", "conservative bias". Nearly but not 100% the same thing.
"I grow old … I grow old …
I shall wear the bottoms of my trousers rolled"

AND MERRY XMAS TO ONE AND All!

Imagehttp://25kv.co.uk/date_counter.php?date ... 20counting!!![/img-sig]

User avatar
Warren Dew
Posts: 3781
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:41 pm
Location: Somerville, MA, USA
Contact:

Re: Mass Shooting at Washington Navy Yard

Post by Warren Dew » Tue Sep 17, 2013 6:50 pm

Ian wrote:
Coito ergo sum wrote:Let's see...

He was paranoid, thinking that everyone was going to try to steal his belongings, so he went around packing a .45 everywhere he went.
He had some psychological issues stemming from 9/11/01
he was wackily religious, spending days at a time "meditating" in a Buddhist temple.
He felt he was discriminated against
He felt that he had recently been financially screwed over his contracting job at the end of last year
He had few friends
He felt the Navy didn't treat him right.

But, he played Call of Duty, so that's why he went on this rampage -- that's the headline. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldne ... games.html

:nono:
Perhaps more restrictive background checks might've helped prevent a guy like that from from being armed the way he was?
Ban Buddhists from having guns and only allow them to Christians? Who knows, maybe it would help. It would be unconstitutional, though.

Of course, two of the guns were stolen on the base.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 12 guests