Perception of Marijuana as a 'Safe Drug' Is Inaccurate

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74202
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Perception of Marijuana as a 'Safe Drug' Is Inaccurate

Post by JimC » Fri Aug 30, 2013 6:18 am

I wonder if anybody else had the experience of eventually developing petite mal like symptoms from smoking dope?

I still miss it, mind...

(the high, not the petite mal...)
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
charlou
arseist
Posts: 32530
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:36 am

Re: Perception of Marijuana as a 'Safe Drug' Is Inaccurate

Post by charlou » Fri Aug 30, 2013 6:31 am

I dropped smoking it a very loooong time ago when it eventually gave me too much of a sense of losing control.

I've considered indulging again some time, just to revisit the pleasant, not quite soporofic, but hedonistic relaxed state of it ..

But, it's no biggie in the scheme of life.
no fences

User avatar
Rum
Absent Minded Processor
Posts: 37285
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
Location: South of the border..though not down Mexico way..
Contact:

Re: Perception of Marijuana as a 'Safe Drug' Is Inaccurate

Post by Rum » Fri Aug 30, 2013 7:12 am

I've held back on this thread so far because I know my experience is not typical, but I developed cannabis psychosis of some kind eventually when I smoked the stuff, as I have reported in the past. It wasn't diagnosed as such, but the symptoms were there. Extreme anxiety, obsessional thoughts, bizarre thoughts and things like that. I did see my GP who eventually referred me to a psychologist. He didn't get to the bottom of it and at the time I didn't even make the connection, except that I knew that when I did indulged (which tailed off pretty rapidly at the time) I went straight into an out of control splintering of thinking and perception that was scary as hell.

This was on the back of quite a few LSD experiences mind you. It felt as if some sort of 'gate' had been opened and smoking dope - even a little - opened it up for all hell to break loose.

If my sort of reaction only happens in 1% of users then I would certainly not categorise it as 'safe'. It took me the best part of a decade to get back to something akin to normality..whatever that is.

User avatar
Cormac
Posts: 6415
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Perception of Marijuana as a 'Safe Drug' Is Inaccurate

Post by Cormac » Sat Aug 31, 2013 7:27 am

Robert_S wrote:
Cormac wrote:
laklak wrote:
Cormac wrote:
laklak wrote:Pretty much. Making it legal or at least decriminalized would hurt only the private prison industry, otherwise there'd be little if any change.
Well, legalisation would remove the market for criminal scumbags - or at least would allow them to go legit.
True, I guess it would hurt the cartels. Unless, as you said, they go legitimate. There's gold in that Acapulco Gold. And Panama Red, and Swazi Gold, and Skunk, and Chronic, and Seattle Green, and....
Yes - and if they go legit, then they'll have lots of competition - from organic farmers and botanists who're expert in creating mellow highs, and so on. They'd be spanked up and down Mary Jane street.
They're invested in moving contraband. They'd more likely switch the contraband.

Fine. To what? If all drugs were legalised, they'd not be shipping drugs

More likely, they'd switch to other forms of criminality, where behaviours are more obvious, and therefore, successful interventions would be easier.
FUCKERPUNKERSHIT!


Wanna buy some pegs Dave, I've got some pegs here...
You're my wife now!

User avatar
MrFungus420
Posts: 881
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 4:51 pm
Location: Midland, MI USA
Contact:

Re: Perception of Marijuana as a 'Safe Drug' Is Inaccurate

Post by MrFungus420 » Sat Aug 31, 2013 7:41 am

Blind groper wrote:There is no doubt that marijuana smokers have more lung cancer than non smokers. This is often explained by the fact that many marijuana smokers also smoke tobacco. But the jury is still out on that.
To say that the jury is still out on it means that THERE IS DOUBT.

You are contradicting yourself.
Blind groper wrote:And no. We have no clear evidence that alcohol causes more harm to the individual than marijuana. Both cause harm. Comparing degree of harm is difficult, because the harms are different. How do you quantify te harm from teenage psychoses caused by marijuana to the liver harm caused by alcohol in middle aged people? You cannot.
Alcohol is poisonous to EVERYBODY. Marijuana MAY increase your risk for psychosis IF you are already at risk.

Alcohol KILLS, marijuana does not.

Alcohol is objectively more harmful than marijuana.
P1: I am a nobody.
P2: Nobody is perfect.
C: Therefore, I am perfect

User avatar
MrFungus420
Posts: 881
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 4:51 pm
Location: Midland, MI USA
Contact:

Re: Perception of Marijuana as a 'Safe Drug' Is Inaccurate

Post by MrFungus420 » Sat Aug 31, 2013 7:44 am

Rum wrote:I've held back on this thread so far because I know my experience is not typical, but I developed cannabis psychosis of some kind eventually when I smoked the stuff, as I have reported in the past. It wasn't diagnosed as such, but the symptoms were there. Extreme anxiety, obsessional thoughts, bizarre thoughts and things like that. I did see my GP who eventually referred me to a psychologist. He didn't get to the bottom of it and at the time I didn't even make the connection, except that I knew that when I did indulged (which tailed off pretty rapidly at the time) I went straight into an out of control splintering of thinking and perception that was scary as hell.

This was on the back of quite a few LSD experiences mind you. It felt as if some sort of 'gate' had been opened and smoking dope - even a little - opened it up for all hell to break loose.

If my sort of reaction only happens in 1% of users then I would certainly not categorise it as 'safe'. It took me the best part of a decade to get back to something akin to normality..whatever that is.
But the point is that nobody is saying that it is safe, full stop.

It is relatively safe. It is safer than virtually all other drugs.
P1: I am a nobody.
P2: Nobody is perfect.
C: Therefore, I am perfect

User avatar
Tyrannical
Posts: 6468
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:59 am
Contact:

Re: Perception of Marijuana as a 'Safe Drug' Is Inaccurate

Post by Tyrannical » Sat Aug 31, 2013 12:08 pm

The nature of the teenage brain makes users of cannabis amongst this population particularly at risk of developing addictive behaviors and suffering other long-term negative effects, according to researchers at the University of Montreal and New York's Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.
Those wacky Dutch did some study I saw on TV several years back where they let young teens (possibly juvenile jail) smoke all the pot they wanted. By their later teens they were done with it.
A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.

User avatar
Tyrannical
Posts: 6468
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:59 am
Contact:

Re: Perception of Marijuana as a 'Safe Drug' Is Inaccurate

Post by Tyrannical » Sat Aug 31, 2013 12:21 pm

Făkünamę wrote:Has any state in the U.S. legalized marijuana farming? I thought it was just possession for personal use.

Anywho, I'm sure there'd be a shit-fuckton of standards, regulations, licenses, and other bullshit, put in place on marijuana farming if it was legalized. The price would likely go up for the consumer as corporate conglomerates take over production and distribution.
I live in one of those medical marijuana states, so patients can have up to six adult plants. But they can out source that six to a "caregiver" who may grow plants for several patients, or buy pot from a dispensary. I'm not sure all the details, but the end result is you can not find Mexican commercial grade pot on the local market anymore. All legally and illegally sold pot is indoor grown locally. Prices are about 50% higher, but the quality is much better.
A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.

User avatar
Blind groper
Posts: 3997
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 3:10 am
About me: From New Zealand
Contact:

Re: Perception of Marijuana as a 'Safe Drug' Is Inaccurate

Post by Blind groper » Sat Aug 31, 2013 8:09 pm

To MrFungus who believes alcohol kills.

Certainly it does, in overdose. So does water.

The lethality of alcohol is such that among males it will kill 50% at a dose equivalent to 1.5 litres of whisky. (That is : a man who drinks two 26 ounce bottles of whisky in a sitting has a 50% chance of dying.) For women, the equivalent is 1 litre.

The key point here is the variability from individual to individual, and the very high dose required. Certainly alcohol can kill. So can anything else we ingest. But alcohol is low in toxicity, because we have to consume a hell of a lot for it to become toxic.

As far as chronic toxicity is concerned, that also depends on the individual. I have been a lover of red wine for 40 years, and drink about 4 bottles per week. My health is superb. My blood pressure is that of a healthy 20 year old. My cholesterol is low. Resting pulse is low. Heart and liver function excellent. My father died at 83 (of lung cancer, since he was a smoker), and I expect to substantially outlive him (I am not a smoker).

Chemical analysis shows that marijuana smoke contains a lot of toxins and carcinogens. However, most marijuana smokers do not consume a lot. Compared to tobacco smokers, the dose is low. And that is why we do not see a lot of marijuana smokers (except those who also smoke tobacco) go down with lung cancer. That does not alter the fact that marijuana smoke contains those nasty materials. Smoking marijuana is not healthy. And not just for teenagers.

User avatar
Cormac
Posts: 6415
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Perception of Marijuana as a 'Safe Drug' Is Inaccurate

Post by Cormac » Sat Aug 31, 2013 8:14 pm

Blind groper wrote:To MrFungus who believes alcohol kills.

Certainly it does, in overdose. So does water.

The lethality of alcohol is such that among males it will kill 50% at a dose equivalent to 1.5 litres of whisky. (That is : a man who drinks two 26 ounce bottles of whisky in a sitting has a 50% chance of dying.) For women, the equivalent is 1 litre.

The key point here is the variability from individual to individual, and the very high dose required. Certainly alcohol can kill. So can anything else we ingest. But alcohol is low in toxicity, because we have to consume a hell of a lot for it to become toxic.

As far as chronic toxicity is concerned, that also depends on the individual. I have been a lover of red wine for 40 years, and drink about 4 bottles per week. My health is superb. My blood pressure is that of a healthy 20 year old. My cholesterol is low. Resting pulse is low. Heart and liver function excellent. My father died at 83 (of lung cancer, since he was a smoker), and I expect to substantially outlive him (I am not a smoker).

Chemical analysis shows that marijuana smoke contains a lot of toxins and carcinogens. However, most marijuana smokers do not consume a lot. Compared to tobacco smokers, the dose is low. And that is why we do not see a lot of marijuana smokers (except those who also smoke tobacco) go down with lung cancer. That does not alter the fact that marijuana smoke contains those nasty materials. Smoking marijuana is not healthy. And not just for teenagers.

Fucking hell. I should be dead. In my teens and early 20s, I regularly drank more whiskey than that in a single sitting, accompanied by 8 or 10 beers.
FUCKERPUNKERSHIT!


Wanna buy some pegs Dave, I've got some pegs here...
You're my wife now!

User avatar
Audley Strange
"I blame the victim"
Posts: 7485
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Perception of Marijuana as a 'Safe Drug' Is Inaccurate

Post by Audley Strange » Sat Aug 31, 2013 8:21 pm

I never thought it was safe, you'd need to be dead from the feet up to think anything is "safe". However one good doobie would blast me for hours. When I smoked cigarettes, I smoked perhaps 10/15 a day at tops. I was lucky if I had two or three joints a night. When I used to drink, I used to smoke as well. So I guess I could say there was harm reduction in smoking cannabis, but the truth was and is, I fucking love it, but then like everything, moderation is the key.
"What started as a legitimate effort by the townspeople of Salem to identify, capture and kill those who did Satan's bidding quickly deteriorated into a witch hunt" Army Man

User avatar
Pappa
Non-Practicing Anarchist
Non-Practicing Anarchist
Posts: 56488
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:42 am
About me: I am sacrificing a turnip as I type.
Location: Le sud du Pays de Galles.
Contact:

Re: Perception of Marijuana as a 'Safe Drug' Is Inaccurate

Post by Pappa » Sat Aug 31, 2013 9:23 pm

Blind groper wrote:To MrFungus who believes alcohol kills.

Certainly it does, in overdose. So does water.

The lethality of alcohol is such that among males it will kill 50% at a dose equivalent to 1.5 litres of whisky. (That is : a man who drinks two 26 ounce bottles of whisky in a sitting has a 50% chance of dying.) For women, the equivalent is 1 litre.

The key point here is the variability from individual to individual, and the very high dose required. Certainly alcohol can kill. So can anything else we ingest. But alcohol is low in toxicity, because we have to consume a hell of a lot for it to become toxic.

As far as chronic toxicity is concerned, that also depends on the individual. I have been a lover of red wine for 40 years, and drink about 4 bottles per week. My health is superb. My blood pressure is that of a healthy 20 year old. My cholesterol is low. Resting pulse is low. Heart and liver function excellent. My father died at 83 (of lung cancer, since he was a smoker), and I expect to substantially outlive him (I am not a smoker).

Chemical analysis shows that marijuana smoke contains a lot of toxins and carcinogens. However, most marijuana smokers do not consume a lot. Compared to tobacco smokers, the dose is low. And that is why we do not see a lot of marijuana smokers (except those who also smoke tobacco) go down with lung cancer. That does not alter the fact that marijuana smoke contains those nasty materials. Smoking marijuana is not healthy. And not just for teenagers.
Alcohol can be a contributing factor in heart disease and some types of cancer.
For information on ways to help support Rationalia financially, see our funding page.


When the aliens do come, everything we once thought was cool will then make us ashamed.

User avatar
Robert_S
Cookie Monster
Posts: 13416
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
Location: Illinois
Contact:

Re: Perception of Marijuana as a 'Safe Drug' Is Inaccurate

Post by Robert_S » Sat Aug 31, 2013 9:28 pm

Pappa wrote:
Blind groper wrote:To MrFungus who believes alcohol kills.

Certainly it does, in overdose. So does water.

The lethality of alcohol is such that among males it will kill 50% at a dose equivalent to 1.5 litres of whisky. (That is : a man who drinks two 26 ounce bottles of whisky in a sitting has a 50% chance of dying.) For women, the equivalent is 1 litre.

The key point here is the variability from individual to individual, and the very high dose required. Certainly alcohol can kill. So can anything else we ingest. But alcohol is low in toxicity, because we have to consume a hell of a lot for it to become toxic.

As far as chronic toxicity is concerned, that also depends on the individual. I have been a lover of red wine for 40 years, and drink about 4 bottles per week. My health is superb. My blood pressure is that of a healthy 20 year old. My cholesterol is low. Resting pulse is low. Heart and liver function excellent. My father died at 83 (of lung cancer, since he was a smoker), and I expect to substantially outlive him (I am not a smoker).

Chemical analysis shows that marijuana smoke contains a lot of toxins and carcinogens. However, most marijuana smokers do not consume a lot. Compared to tobacco smokers, the dose is low. And that is why we do not see a lot of marijuana smokers (except those who also smoke tobacco) go down with lung cancer. That does not alter the fact that marijuana smoke contains those nasty materials. Smoking marijuana is not healthy. And not just for teenagers.
Alcohol can be a contributing factor in heart disease and some types of cancer.
Let's not forget brain damage, "wet brain", higher incidents of violence, it's much more dangerous when combined with a motor vehicle, it tends to cause more and worse domestic abuse, date rapes, it can give you physical as well as psychological dependence.

And then there's fucking noisy obnoxious drunks... Give me potheads over drunks for neighbors any time.
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P

The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange

User avatar
Xamonas Chegwé
Bouncer
Bouncer
Posts: 50939
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:23 pm
About me: I have prehensile eyebrows.
I speak 9 languages fluently, one of which other people can also speak.
When backed into a corner, I fit perfectly - having a right-angled arse.
Location: Nottingham UK
Contact:

Re: Perception of Marijuana as a 'Safe Drug' Is Inaccurate

Post by Xamonas Chegwé » Sat Aug 31, 2013 9:40 pm

Robert_S wrote:
Pappa wrote:
Blind groper wrote:To MrFungus who believes alcohol kills.

Certainly it does, in overdose. So does water.

The lethality of alcohol is such that among males it will kill 50% at a dose equivalent to 1.5 litres of whisky. (That is : a man who drinks two 26 ounce bottles of whisky in a sitting has a 50% chance of dying.) For women, the equivalent is 1 litre.

The key point here is the variability from individual to individual, and the very high dose required. Certainly alcohol can kill. So can anything else we ingest. But alcohol is low in toxicity, because we have to consume a hell of a lot for it to become toxic.

As far as chronic toxicity is concerned, that also depends on the individual. I have been a lover of red wine for 40 years, and drink about 4 bottles per week. My health is superb. My blood pressure is that of a healthy 20 year old. My cholesterol is low. Resting pulse is low. Heart and liver function excellent. My father died at 83 (of lung cancer, since he was a smoker), and I expect to substantially outlive him (I am not a smoker).

Chemical analysis shows that marijuana smoke contains a lot of toxins and carcinogens. However, most marijuana smokers do not consume a lot. Compared to tobacco smokers, the dose is low. And that is why we do not see a lot of marijuana smokers (except those who also smoke tobacco) go down with lung cancer. That does not alter the fact that marijuana smoke contains those nasty materials. Smoking marijuana is not healthy. And not just for teenagers.
Alcohol can be a contributing factor in heart disease and some types of cancer.
Let's not forget brain damage, "wet brain", higher incidents of violence, it's much more dangerous when combined with a motor vehicle, it tends to cause more and worse domestic abuse, date rapes, it can give you physical as well as psychological dependence.

And then there's fucking noisy obnoxious drunks... Give me potheads over drunks for neighbors any time.
I wouldn't believe any claim that implied potheads were better drivers though! :tea:
A book is a version of the world. If you do not like it, ignore it; or offer your own version in return.
Salman Rushdie
You talk to God, you're religious. God talks to you, you're psychotic.
House MD
Who needs a meaning anyway, I'd settle anyday for a very fine view.
Sandy Denny
This is the wrong forum for bluffing :nono:
Paco
Yes, yes. But first I need to show you this venomous fish!
Calilasseia
I think we should do whatever Pawiz wants.
Twoflower
Bella squats momentarily then waddles on still peeing, like a horse
Millefleur

User avatar
Robert_S
Cookie Monster
Posts: 13416
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
Location: Illinois
Contact:

Re: Perception of Marijuana as a 'Safe Drug' Is Inaccurate

Post by Robert_S » Sat Aug 31, 2013 9:47 pm

Xamonas Chegwé wrote: I wouldn't believe any claim that implied potheads were better drivers though! :tea:
I would. They both fuck up your skills and I wouldn't recommend driving on either. But one of them, makes a regular person into a cocky bastard, that alone makes a huge difference in safety. One blows right through the stop sign, the other waits for it to change color.
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P

The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests