Perception of Marijuana as a 'Safe Drug' Is Inaccurate

User avatar
rachelbean
"awesome."
Posts: 15757
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:08 am
About me: I'm a nerd.
Location: Wales, aka not England
Contact:

Re: Perception of Marijuana as a 'Safe Drug' Is Inaccurate

Post by rachelbean » Tue Aug 27, 2013 9:06 pm

We must do it different in California. I've almost never met anyone who smokes it mixed. Most people use pipes, bongs or vaporizers, or just rolled, but I've never smoked it mixed or known anybody who did regularly :dunno:
lordpasternack wrote:Yeah - I fuckin' love oppressin' ma wimmin, like I love chowin' on ma bacon and tuggin' on ma ol' cock… ;)
Pappa wrote:God is a cunt! I wank over pictures of Jesus! I love Darwin so much I'd have sex with his bones!!!!
Image

User avatar
Sælir
The Obedient Wife
Posts: 3218
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2010 12:48 am
Contact:

Re: Perception of Marijuana as a 'Safe Drug' Is Inaccurate

Post by Sælir » Tue Aug 27, 2013 9:15 pm

We mix it here. :dunno:
I´m just a delicate little flower!

User avatar
Robert_S
Cookie Monster
Posts: 13416
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
Location: Illinois
Contact:

Re: Perception of Marijuana as a 'Safe Drug' Is Inaccurate

Post by Robert_S » Tue Aug 27, 2013 9:34 pm

I used to make a spleef to conserve the weed, keep my tolerance down, and not have to deal with paraphernalia.

Blunts are far more common. Pipes, one hitters and bongs are more more common still.
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P

The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange

User avatar
MrFungus420
Posts: 881
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 4:51 pm
Location: Midland, MI USA
Contact:

Re: Perception of Marijuana as a 'Safe Drug' Is Inaccurate

Post by MrFungus420 » Tue Aug 27, 2013 9:37 pm

Scrumple wrote:I don't think it is often smoked alone, wasn't in the old days anyway.
With the exception of the idiots that do blunts (emptying a cigar and refilling it with pot), I have never seen them mixed.

What "old days" are you talking about? I've been smoking pot since 1986 and have smoked with literally hundreds of people. I've smoked a blunt on 4 occasions and never smoked any pot that was just mixed with tobacco.
Last edited by MrFungus420 on Tue Aug 27, 2013 9:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
P1: I am a nobody.
P2: Nobody is perfect.
C: Therefore, I am perfect

User avatar
MrFungus420
Posts: 881
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 4:51 pm
Location: Midland, MI USA
Contact:

Re: Perception of Marijuana as a 'Safe Drug' Is Inaccurate

Post by MrFungus420 » Tue Aug 27, 2013 9:41 pm

hackenslash wrote:
Scrumple wrote:I don't think it is often smoked alone, wasn't in the old days anyway.
Depends what you mean by 'often', and what you mean by 'the old days'. I've smoked alone every day for the last 30 years or so, and I can name oodles more like me.
If you're ever in Michigan, look me up.

Image
P1: I am a nobody.
P2: Nobody is perfect.
C: Therefore, I am perfect

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74202
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Perception of Marijuana as a 'Safe Drug' Is Inaccurate

Post by JimC » Tue Aug 27, 2013 10:05 pm

This is so true. If I hadn't taken up the vile weed at University, I would now be a billionaire with a Nobel Prize, married to Jennifer Hawkins...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
hackenslash
Fundie Baiter...errr. Fun Debater
Posts: 1380
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 5:05 am
About me: I've got a little black book with my poems in...
Location: Between the cutoff and the resonance
Contact:

Re: Perception of Marijuana as a 'Safe Drug' Is Inaccurate

Post by hackenslash » Tue Aug 27, 2013 10:28 pm

MrFungus420 wrote:
hackenslash wrote:
Scrumple wrote:I don't think it is often smoked alone, wasn't in the old days anyway.
Depends what you mean by 'often', and what you mean by 'the old days'. I've smoked alone every day for the last 30 years or so, and I can name oodles more like me.
If you're ever in Michigan, look me up.

Image
Dude, you were always on my list. :wink:
Dogma is the death of the intellect

User avatar
hadespussercats
I've come for your pants.
Posts: 18586
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 12:27 am
About me: Looks pretty good, coming out of the back of his neck like that.
Location: Gotham
Contact:

Re: Perception of Marijuana as a 'Safe Drug' Is Inaccurate

Post by hadespussercats » Tue Aug 27, 2013 10:51 pm

rachelbean wrote:Except the article doesn't state anything new. It is not safe for some adolescents, particularly those with genetic or psychological issues already identified. Shocking :yawn:
Those psychological issues aren't already identified, generally. That's the rub-- you don't know if you're one of the unlucky few that pot makes crazy until... you've gone crazy.

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74202
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Perception of Marijuana as a 'Safe Drug' Is Inaccurate

Post by JimC » Tue Aug 27, 2013 10:56 pm

It is commonly believed here that the average strength of street dope is much, much higher now than it was in the 70s, due to efficient selection of high THC yield varieties by growers, so any bad effects to susceptible individuals may be worse...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
Ian
Mr Incredible
Posts: 16975
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 6:42 pm
Location: Washington DC

Re: Perception of Marijuana as a 'Safe Drug' Is Inaccurate

Post by Ian » Tue Aug 27, 2013 11:00 pm

hadespussercats wrote:
rachelbean wrote:Except the article doesn't state anything new. It is not safe for some adolescents, particularly those with genetic or psychological issues already identified. Shocking :yawn:
Those psychological issues aren't already identified, generally. That's the rub-- you don't know if you're one of the unlucky few that pot makes crazy until... you've gone crazy.
My 21-yr old cousin wrote something about this on her Facebook page a few weeks ago. She linked an article which discussed the dangers of marijuana on people prone to mental disorders - which she is; she's been diagnosed with some kind of schizo disorder.

And JimC is right - marijuana today is much more potent than the stuff people smoked back in the 60s and 70s. Conversely, LSD back then was more powerful than what tends to be available today.

User avatar
hackenslash
Fundie Baiter...errr. Fun Debater
Posts: 1380
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 5:05 am
About me: I've got a little black book with my poems in...
Location: Between the cutoff and the resonance
Contact:

Re: Perception of Marijuana as a 'Safe Drug' Is Inaccurate

Post by hackenslash » Tue Aug 27, 2013 11:05 pm

JimC wrote:It is commonly believed here that the average strength of street dope is much, much higher now than it was in the 70s, due to efficient selection of high THC yield varieties by growers, so any bad effects to susceptible individuals may be worse...
As always, common belief is incorrect, or at least here it is.

most people here are smoking extremely low-grade resin, with most of the rest of the majority taken up by low- to middle-grade green.

The best shit is, as always, the really high-grade resin, but that's very expensive. This is the crap I mostly smoke.

BTW, I still routinely get the highest grade, mostly because of my circle of friends.
Dogma is the death of the intellect

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74202
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Perception of Marijuana as a 'Safe Drug' Is Inaccurate

Post by JimC » Tue Aug 27, 2013 11:08 pm

hackenslash wrote:
JimC wrote:It is commonly believed here that the average strength of street dope is much, much higher now than it was in the 70s, due to efficient selection of high THC yield varieties by growers, so any bad effects to susceptible individuals may be worse...
As always, common belief is incorrect, or at least here it is.

most people here are smoking extremely low-grade resin, with most of the rest of the majority taken up by low- to middle-grade green.

The best shit is, as always, the really high-grade resin, but that's very expensive. This is the crap I mostly smoke.

BTW, I still routinely get the highest grade, mostly because of my circle of friends.
We used to smoke very ordinary green, hash only occasionally...

Haven't smoked any for years, so it's hearsay, but I hear it a lot...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
Pappa
Non-Practicing Anarchist
Non-Practicing Anarchist
Posts: 56488
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:42 am
About me: I am sacrificing a turnip as I type.
Location: Le sud du Pays de Galles.
Contact:

Re: Perception of Marijuana as a 'Safe Drug' Is Inaccurate

Post by Pappa » Tue Aug 27, 2013 11:12 pm

hackenslash wrote:
JimC wrote:It is commonly believed here that the average strength of street dope is much, much higher now than it was in the 70s, due to efficient selection of high THC yield varieties by growers, so any bad effects to susceptible individuals may be worse...
As always, common belief is incorrect, or at least here it is.

most people here are smoking extremely low-grade resin, with most of the rest of the majority taken up by low- to middle-grade green.

The best shit is, as always, the really high-grade resin, but that's very expensive. This is the crap I mostly smoke.

BTW, I still routinely get the highest grade, mostly because of my circle of friends.
Also, just because higher grade skunk is available, it doesn't necessarily follow that people are getting more stoned. They may just being smoking less and getting similarly high.

It must be better than smoking the boot polish and glue that frequently ended up (probably still does) in resin.
For information on ways to help support Rationalia financially, see our funding page.


When the aliens do come, everything we once thought was cool will then make us ashamed.

User avatar
Jason
Destroyer of words
Posts: 17782
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:46 pm
Contact:

Re: Perception of Marijuana as a 'Safe Drug' Is Inaccurate

Post by Jason » Tue Aug 27, 2013 11:30 pm

Svartalf wrote:
Făkünamę wrote:There is no tobacco in marijuana. They're two entirely different plants.

If you're trying to claim that marijuana contains carcinogens like tobacco does, then you need to do some reading:
Smoke from tobacco and cannabis contains many of the same carcinogens and tumor promoters [20,21]. However, cannabis and tobacco have additional pharmacological activities, both receptor-dependent and independent, that result in different biological endpoints. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons found in smoke are pro-carcinogens that are converted to carcinogens by the enzymatic activity of the cytochrome P4501A1 oxidase protein (CYP1A1 gene product). Benzo [a] pyrene is converted to its carcinogenic metabolite diol epoxide, which binds to specific hyper-mutable nucleotide sequences in the K-ras oncogene and p53 tumor suppressor [22]. Recent work by Roth et al. demonstrates that THC treatment of murine hepatoma cells caused a dose dependent increase in CYP1A1 gene transcription, while at the same time directly inhibiting the enzymatic activity of the gene product [23]. Thus, despite potentially higher levels of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons found in cannabis smoke compared to tobacco smoke (dependent on what part of the plant is smoked), the THC present in cannabis smoke should exert a protective effect against pro-carcinogens that require activation. In contrast, nicotine activates some CYP1A1 activities, thus potentially increasing the carcinogenic effects of tobacco smoke
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1277837/
Few people I've known ever smoked their MJ pure, that's why the fags are called 'joints'
Funny because few people I've ever known mixed tobacco and marijuana unless they were smokers (of tobacco) to begin with. It has no bearing on the health implications of marijuana anyway as it's the evil tobacco introducing those nasty carcinogens.

User avatar
Jason
Destroyer of words
Posts: 17782
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:46 pm
Contact:

Re: Perception of Marijuana as a 'Safe Drug' Is Inaccurate

Post by Jason » Tue Aug 27, 2013 11:34 pm

JimC wrote:It is commonly believed here that the average strength of street dope is much, much higher now than it was in the 70s, due to efficient selection of high THC yield varieties by growers, so any bad effects to susceptible individuals may be worse...
My dad claims you old fogies used to smoke the leaves. What's up with that? The buds contain 90% more THC, or more.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests