Robert_S wrote:It actually works. Starting the day thinking about dogs, or cats.
They're fuzzy!


Robert_S wrote:It actually works. Starting the day thinking about dogs, or cats.
They're fuzzy!
Shit, waking up enough for me. I live in a big flat with all modern conveniences, a fridge full of food, clean running water, I'm pretty healthy, I have a wife whom I cherish and a neighbourhood that's not on fire or being run by paramilitaries. What the fuck have I got to complain about really? Not enough ram on my comp?Robert_S wrote:It actually works. Starting the day thinking about dogs, or cats.
They're fuzzy!
I heartily disagree with this sentiment. Living in the First World doesn't mean that all of our problems are "First World problems." And it doesn't by definition make the rest of our experiences trivial, either.audley wrote:We live in the West, most of us and we should all be very fucking thankful of that. Everything else is just pudding toppers.
No, but it still means that we have more facilities, opportunities and freedoms than most of the globe combined. If you add all the problems we may have (crime, illness, poverty) to things like war, starvation and totalitarianism, we are still much better off than most other places. I think we live in societies where our basic needs are predominately met, where the majority of us are comfortable, but you don't have to.hadespussercats wrote:I heartily disagree with this sentiment. Living in the First World doesn't mean that all of our problems are "First World problems." And it doesn't by definition make the rest of our experiences trivial, either.audley wrote:We live in the West, most of us and we should all be very fucking thankful of that. Everything else is just pudding toppers.
Material wealth does not necessarily do much to promote emotional well-being. In fact, western culture is a heavy promoter of both the Rat Race and Hedonist archetypes described in the OP, - it relies on them to push people into competition and consumption.Audley Strange wrote:No, but it still means that we have more facilities, opportunities and freedoms than most of the globe combined. If you add all the problems we may have (crime, illness, poverty) to things like war, starvation and totalitarianism, we are still much better off than most other places. I think we live in societies where our basic needs are predominately met, where the majority of us are comfortable, but you don't have to.hadespussercats wrote:I heartily disagree with this sentiment. Living in the First World doesn't mean that all of our problems are "First World problems." And it doesn't by definition make the rest of our experiences trivial, either.audley wrote:We live in the West, most of us and we should all be very fucking thankful of that. Everything else is just pudding toppers.
hadespussercats wrote:I heartily disagree with this sentiment. Living in the First World doesn't mean that all of our problems are "First World problems." And it doesn't by definition make the rest of our experiences trivial, either.audley wrote:We live in the West, most of us and we should all be very fucking thankful of that. Everything else is just pudding toppers.
Yes, I say you should feel happy that you recognised as bad as things might have been for you they were worse for someone else and thus it stopped you from killing yourself. Hell I'm happy about that. However I was speaking of contentment. I said happiness is a fleeting emotional state earlier on.hadespussercats wrote:Audley, there have been any number of times when I've talked myself down from some neurotic cliff by reminding myself that there are people with war in their countries. But that sentiment has almost nothing to do with happiness. If events had turned out differently, I could be drowning right now in a freezing cold North Atlantic tide. I'm not. Should I feel happy for that? Seems bizarre to me that I would.
Yet happiness in many western nations is at relatively low levels for modern times.Clinton Huxley wrote:I think the emotional trauma from finding that the well one has been walking to for the
past last 6 hours only contains a cupful of parasite-laden water trumps the emotional
trauma from finding that the local shop only has full-fat coca-cola.
Material wealth allows us Westerners to moan about non immediately life-threatening concerns. No one in history has ever had it so easy.
Really? I think happiness levels would be higher in some more traditional societies.Audley Strange wrote:Our societies are not perfect, nor the humans in them, but they are the best going.
Self-pity is like a gas, it expands to fill all available space.rEvolutionist wrote:Yet happiness in many western nations is at relatively low levels for modern times.Clinton Huxley wrote:I think the emotional trauma from finding that the well one has been walking to for the
past last 6 hours only contains a cupful of parasite-laden water trumps the emotional
trauma from finding that the local shop only has full-fat coca-cola.
Material wealth allows us Westerners to moan about non immediately life-threatening concerns. No one in history has ever had it so easy.
You may be right, certainly I've been in places where people have fuck all but goats and mud huts, who seemed more content than we do.rEvolutionist wrote:Really? I think happiness levels would be higher in some more traditional societies.Audley Strange wrote:Our societies are not perfect, nor the humans in them, but they are the best going.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests