Merca.

[Collector1337]

Jeez rev, I've been reading this thread, and it seems you've lost it.

Are you ever going to make your point about what schools and "nutjob militants" have to do with each other?

Also, apparently everything is a "strawman" to you, which I find comical.

The only bigotry I've really seen from anyone has been from you.

You're getting so angry, but none of it seems to be justified. When I get angry in gun threads, it's because my life and liberty are being threatened. The only thing I've seen that's been threatened of yours, is maybe your ego.

I was mistaken in that you didn't explicitly mention my disability, however, as your quote in this thread shows, you know damn well why I am on the dole.

Don't confuse mental illness with disability. They aren't the same thing.

[Hermit]

"Tedious" and "annoying" aren't fucking mutually exclusive. In fact, they are very fucking similar. In fact they share fucking synonyms in the thesaurus. Can you understand this exceedingly simple point?

Newsflash: There's a reason why we have one word for being bored by something and a different one for something that annoys us. So, please don't put the wrong word into my mouth. I am not annoyed by Coito's repeated rants about alleged anti-USA prejudices. I just find it boring that he can't help himself for compulsively compensating for his inferiority complex with them. The repetitiveness is, uhm, well, tedious.

It's not as though I can't be annoyed by things people say, but Coito's rants about the respective values and vices of The USA and Europe are not among them, thanks.

Well, I would say that it's not a compulsion, but more of a sensitivity on my part. I see this kind of thing quite often, and I like to respond to it an point it out because, to me, it is tedious and soporific, among other things. Plus, there is no end to the list of things about which non-Merkins, especially Yerpeeins, claim a kind of superiority.

I don't think I have an inferiority complex, as I certainly do not view Yerpeeins, Canadians and Australians as my betters. Frankly, what brings my objections to the fore are the constant reverse claims - the claims by Yerpeeins, Canadians and Australians that they are the betters of Merka and Merkins.

Yes, how in the world, indeed, could a person get into the law enforcement system when he is as crazy as Police Chief Kessler, right? That's the question that was raised, wasn't it? Must be something creepy and "off" about Merka, that the country could let that happen, eh? Merka -- another example of how it sucks so bad -- crazy gun toting looneys can become law enforcement officers here. So, I pointed out that there were examples of far worse folks than Chief Kessler becoming law enforcement officers in Yerup. I mean -- murderers, kidnappers -- they worked their criminal trade for years before being caught and tried and convicted. How did THEY get to be police officers in Yerup? Why isn't that question answered? Why is Chief Kessler seen as a commentary on "Merca" in general, whereas the examples from Yerup are ignored. Plainly one would not consider a few examples of murderous and evil cops as indicative of anything regarding a Yerpeein country, right? I certainly don't consider it representative in that fashion. Yet in thread after thread such things ARE considered representative of Merka.

Even after I pointed out that this guy is a big nobody, running a basically one man LOCAL police force in a town of about 375 families in the secluded coal mountains of rural Pennsylvania. They don't even really have crime there for him to handle. He's there basically to respond to the occasional call for help from neighbors who may hear a bump in the night, or need some help now and again. Other than that, NOTHING HAPPENS THERE.

The context is ignored. The details are ignored. And all we get to read is how "Oh, my flippin' gawd!!! In Merka a man can be a POLICE CHIEF -- CHIEF OF POLICE -- and make looney pro-gun statements on youtube videos and tell his detractors to fuck off!!!! How craaaaaaaazzzyzyyyyy is Merka??? This would never happen here in [insert proper country's name]!!!!!"

Really? You have no nutjobs in "proper countries?"

FFS, did you only read the last two sentences of this post?

[Robert_S]

Wow.

Just... Wow.

[Coito ergo sum]

I have only skimmed read two of your replies and you lie through your fucking teeth.

Quote the lie, and tell me what the truth is. Let's get to the bottom of it.[/quote]

FFS. I"ve pointed it out 5 or 6 fucking times. THIS is why I don't want to "debate" with you. You are a dishonest cunt.[/quote]

Quote it. I'm not interested in your distortion. You said I lied. Quote my lie.

I can tell you I did not "lie" in terms of an intentional falsehood. If you would be so kind as to quote the "factually incorrect" thing that I said, and show me the correct fact, then I'd be glad to discuss it with you.

I already have MULTIPLE FUCKING TIMES, and you refuse to accept that you've made shit up about what I said. I don't give a fuck whether you've done it on purpose or you've done it because you are a thick cunt, but the fact is you have done it and when it has been pointed out, you refuse to accept you've done it. And as I said, this is now at least the third time in about 3 weeks or so that you've done this - twice with me, and once with another member.

You have not done so at all, let alone "multiple fucking times." The only thing you've done multiple times is call me names and hurl profanities.

If I am wrong, I'll admit it.

Bullshit you will. I've NEVER seen you admit you are wrong in all my time reading your tiresome bollocks on this forum.

I've never seen you admit your wrong, and I've pointed out several times on this thread alone where you're wrong. You just refuse to discuss it, gloss over it, and hurl insults.

If I can clarify for you a misconception, then I'd be happy to do that too.

You've had PLENTY of opportunity to "clarify". I've made it abundantly clear what I was referring to, and that your reply didn't match what I was referring to.

You're off on tangents. Like the nonsense about schools or public schools or whatever. In Oz, you teach Creationism in the public school system. In the US we do not. In both the US and Oz, a private school can teach basically what they want. You threw that fact out there as a slam on the US, implying that in the US we do teach creationism "in science class." We do not. Nowhere, except in a wholly private institution could that legally happen.

What does that have to do with anything? Why are you so enraged about this Creationism thing. You were wrong - there ARE a significant amount of Ozzie Creationists. And, you DO teach creationism in your schools, including but not necessarily limited to your public, government run schools. We don't do that in the US, except in private schools where they may or may not teach that. But, that's the important distinction. What people do voluntarily, on their own time and on their own dime, is up to them. Like teaching Creationism in Sunday School or at a Baptist Summer School. Of course they do.

Also, you may wish to do more than "skim" and then react wildly. That may be your real issue. You may not actually read and understand what people write.

Lol, says the terminal strawmanner who claims that his strawmen aren't intentional and maybe just a misunderstanding. Start understanding, and then you can criticise other people for their alleged failings.

You're missing it again. I never once claimed that my strawmen aren't intentional. I was very clear that I haven't strawmanned you at all. I've only gone by what you, and others have said. One time, you got all mad because I gave you a straight answer to your question "Who said.....?" -- I told you who said. You then got mad at me for doing that because you claimed that you personally had not been the one saying the thing at issue.

I DID NOT MENTION PUBLIC SCHOOLS. You linked an article that stated that creationism is taught in HISTORY CLASSES in Queensland as evidence that creationism is taught in schools here. BUT I SAID SCIENCE CLASSES. Retract your lies or go fuck yourself, you dishonest cunt.

O.k., I have already addressed this.

You wrote a pile of bollocks in response, with MORE lies. You claimed that I said "public" schools. I simply did not. I've asked you to quote it before, and you haven't, because you are a lying cunt.

Dude - who cares? What other schools are you referring to? They do, in fact, teach Creationism in public schools in Oz. That's the only kind of school that has its curriculum officially set by a government body, right? A private school teaches what they want, don't they?

I mean - for the love of godless, man. You said "WE don't teach Creationism in science class..." or words to that effect, implying, of course, that in the US we do. Otherwise, who gives a fuck? The bottom line is, YOU DO IN FACT TEACH CREATIONISM IN YOUR SCHOOLS -- maybe not in science class, but so fucking what? You still teach it. In the US we don't. In the US we teach it less than you do in Oz. It's not in our curricula. It's not allowed in science class, in history class in any class -- the only exception is if someone runs a private school somewhere, they can teach what they want, but I suspect that's true in Oz too.

So what is your point, man? Take a pill, for crying out loud.

The classes in Queensland ARE IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS.

QLD wasn't even on the table when I raised the point about schools. If you wanted to talk about public schools, all you had to do was ask that the context of our discussion be changed. But no, you'd prefer to just strawman in a pathetic attempt to try and win the argument.

It's in Australia, isn't it? It's proof that you do teach Creationism in your schools, including the public, state-funded ones.

Strawman? Dude -- you said that you don't teach Creationism in science classes in your schools. I admitted already -- at least once -- that I did not see the importance of "science class" since it was patently obvious that you Ozzies do teach Creationism your schools, including but not necessarily limited to the public, state-funded ones. We don't do that in the US. It's illegal in the US. So for you to bring that up to bash the US is just ridiculous. Get it yet?

Man, it is so obvious that you are just screaming and yelling to deflect away from your erroneous arguments.

A public school is a government run/organized, state funded school.

No shit, Sherlock. Wow. You are a font of knowledge.

And, in Oz, you teach Creationism in your schools. We don't in the US. It's illegal here, under the Supreme Court case law I cited. So, why do you think it's important that you don't teach it in science class, rEv? What in the world could that possibly be relevant to?

Although, you don't seem to know the difference between New Zealand and Australia, so, baby steps, I guess...

LOL - you're must be right. [/sarcasm] -- with the amount of time you have on your hands, though, you should know a lot more than you do. You don't really do anything constructive anyway, so you should have a deep understanding of many disciplines.

A private school is privately run and they can teach whatever they want.

Not in Australia they can't. And even if they could, which they can't, it makes no fucking difference to the fact that you strawmanned me. Goddamn, you are a dishonest piece of work.

Projecting much.

Please, by all means -- make your point -- what is the point of advancing the notion here that Creationism is not taught in your science curriculum?

If these terms are used differently in Oz, then just clarify that so we can be on the same page.

Fuck you. How about you stop misinterpreting things that are written in a way that suits your "argument"? If you are going to invent constraints on another person's argument, then the onus is on YOU to clarify. Unless of course one is a dishonest cunt, then you wouldn't expect them to clarify.

Fine, I was suggesting that you engage in discussion, and you'd rather keep namecalling. Have at it.

i can't clarify your view -- you're incoherent half the time and you don't write your arguments out in a logical framework very well. I'm not going to try to figure out what you're saying. Write it, and if you want to discuss it fine. If you don't, don't.

What is the big problem here? Were you referring to something other than state or government run schools?

LOL. It's a bit late for that. You don't get to play the innocent actor card now. You've lied through your teeth for many posts now, and you did it in at least two other threads in the last couple of weeks. You have a record, champ. You don't get to play innocent little boy any more. You get one chance to retract your bullshit statements, and if you don't then you get vigorously held to account.

You know what rEv -- go have a beer and thank your neighbor for buying it for you. I'm really tired of your games. You know you're full of it. Everyone knows you're full of it.

The point is, in Oz they teach Creationism in the school system -- the school system which is funded by the government, from the public treasury. In the US we do not allow that.

I was the one making a point, dickwad, not you. And that WASN'T my point. So don't disingenuously try and tell us now what "the point" was. You are the one with the chip on your shoulder. You are the one who needs to defend your juvenile butthurt that swells up any time any one says anything bad about the US.

What was your point? You did not state your conclusion in your post regarding Creationism. State it. What do you conclude from the fact that "In Oz we don't teach Creationism in science class?" Why did you say it? Please -- this will be entertaining.

And, in the US you can't teach "Creationism" in history class either, but apparently you can in Oz.

Who gives a fuck? That's got nothing to do with my point. But of course, you know that.

Who the hell knows what your "point" is? You haven't stated what your point is. You've shifted into namecalling. I've been asking you to state your point and clarify what you mean by bringing the Creationist non sequitur up in the first place. You won't do it, because you are just covering up your nonsense with namecalling and profanity.

You are certainly talking about schools in Australia right? And, those schools are "public" in the sense that the public can go to them and they set up by the government and funded from the public treasury, right? You're specifically NOT talking to wholly private entities like religious school run by a church or other such group, right?

I'm talking about SCHOOLS, just like I fucking wrote, you dolt. And as I mentioned now THREE times, I am primarily talking about nutjob militants, which you have now ignored THREE times! Do you honestly think people can't see through your pathetic attempts to dodge the main thrust of the thread?

Great -- you teach Creationism in all your schools, public, private, whatever, except that you don't teach it in science class. Who the fuck cares? What does that have to do with anything we were talking about?

See this is the kind of thing you do. You're all outraged, calling me a liar and such, and what you're flying off the handle about is a giant non sequitur. You're dodging.

I'm not dodging, I'm the one making the fucking point to YOU! YOU'RE dodging my point.

You haven't made a point. Again, who cares if you do or do not teach Creationism in your schools?

If you were not referring to public schools, then what kind of schools ARE you talking about?

SCHOOLS. Should I make it BIGGER so you can read it easier? Am I required to list every possible instantiation of my contention just so that you can't find a case to wiggle out of ANSWERING THE FUCKING QUESTION?

Fuck me. You are a shocker.

[/quote][/quote]

Who cares, rEv? What point are you making? It's WORSE if you blokes teach Creationism in ALL of your schools rather than just in private schools or some schools. You haven't added a distinction that makes a difference to anything.

let's do it this way: you've said that in Oz you don't teach creationism in science class in your schools. So? What is the point you are trying to make from that fact?

[Coito ergo sum]

FFS, did you only read the last two sentences of this post?

I think you make my point very nicely there, and thank you. That's exactly what I initially did in this thread, was to point out that this wacky police chief is not representative of the US or indicative of some sickness applicable only to the US. I pointed out some UK cops that kidapped and murdered folks, and they were "allowed" to become law enforcement officers. We are in agreement.

You pointed out loonies in Australia, which makes the exact same point I was making -- that those who turned this thread as a general indictment of Merka and Merkins, and suggested that proper countries would not allow such people to have positions in law enforcement or leadership. That proper countries have systems that weed such people out of their systems, etc. -- those forum contributors who make such points are just wrong. They draw negative stereotypes based on individual incidents then use it to cast their own countries in a superior light.

That's the kind of thing I responded to.

Look at some of the posts - it's not enough that he criticize Merka, he makes direct allegations that the US is "unique" in this regard, and suffers from some "sickness."

[Coito ergo sum]

Ok, from this http://www.rationalia.com/forum/viewtop ... 22&t=44224 thread, you ridiculed me for being on the dole.

Don't you have to pick up your dole check?

I was mistaken in that you didn't explicitly mention my disability, however, as your quote in this thread shows, you know damn well why I am on the dole.

From this thread:

Aren't you the one on the dole because of your mental problems, or is that someone else?

So go fuck yourself. You are a lowlife piece of shit.

Lordy lordy, rEv, what in the hell are you on about?

I'm liable to report you, but I would think that by now, after the about a dozen insults, I would think one of the mods would take affirmative action here.

You called me:

fucking cunt
Bigoted cunt
lying cunt
Lowlife piece of shit
Idiot
Fucking idiot
Liar
Fucking liar
Scumbag
piece of shit


I mean - that's what remember just off the top of my head -- I'm sure there are repeats and other colorful and profane phrases you've used instead of just discussing the point. But, that's just you. Keep up the good work. Impressive.

And, you're upset with me for criticizing you for being on the dole, and asking you whether it was, in fact, you who were on the dole for some sort of mental problem? Come on. Grow up and stop it with this feigned outrage and stop crying like a little girl. You're embarrassing yourself.

[Hermit]

That's exactly what I initially did in this thread, was to point out that this wacky police chief is not representative of the US ...

I went a bit further than that by mentioning Joh Bjelke-Petersen and Fred Nile. The first of these nutters was elected as Queensland's Premier - and stayed there for 19 years - by at least 19% of that state's electorate. The second became a member Of New South Wales' upper house and remains one decades later to this day. Over 9% of the NSW electorate keeps voting him back in.

Now, I am not saying that having a President who tells the public that he decided to send his soldiers into a war because God told him so is a sign of a rational society. I am merely agreeing that the USA does not by any measure have a monopoly on crazy, and I am saying that the two nutters I used as examples are not in office by virtue of some tiny, isolated zoo-like aberration of a community somewhere beyond the black stump; they were / are definitely and literally representative of a significant portion of Australians.

[Coito ergo sum]

It's not much better than racism or sexism. I call him names, he calls me names. No problems, as far as I am concerned. Just look at Seth and I. We call each other names all the time, and imply that the other is an idiot. But there's a BIG difference between that and bringing up someone's mental illness in a debate in which it has nothing to do with the debate. THAT'S fucking low, and Coit has done it at least twice now. If he said that to me in real life, he'd get a smack in head. What I do to him here is the best I can manage over the electrons.

Yes, it crosses the line when it's something that is personal to you. LOL. Got it. THAT crosses the line, but the offensive stuff that you do, well, that's just good ol' fashioned vigorous debate. Got it.

There's a reason why racism/sexism/ablism/agism etc are considered worse than general name calling, arsewipe. You're a fucking scumbag for raising it TWICE. Once, I could forgive as a cheap shot. Twice is a pattern and shows that you are a bigoted cuntbag. And I'm somewhat pissed that the mods haven't given you a warning for it.

Quote me, tough guy. What's the blurb that has you so "outraged?" I can guarantee that you are not being entirely truthful about what I actually wrote. I'm sure you'll come up with a way not to do that, though. You probably "can't be arsed" and that, followed by a long line of expletives and insults.

I certainly don't respect an able-bodied person such as yourself who figures a way to get people to pay for his beer for him.

How in fucks name would you know how able-bodied or not I am? What an arrogant piece of shit you are!

By reading your posts and I've seen an image(s) of you on another thread, where you looked completely able bodies using your legs and limbs, etc.

But, if you tell me you're physically limited, I'd believe you.

And I will look for the quotes presently. Unfortunately, to find the previous thread, I'll have to read through pages and pages of the mind-numbing bollocks that tumbles unbridled out of your "brain".

I'll wait. If you go to a previous thread, be sure to link to the post because I frankly don't trust you to be honest.

And, I did not bash you for whatever mental problem you may have. I bashed you because you're a layabout.

THREE times. Fuck off you bigoted wanker. If I ever meet you in person, I'm going to rearrange your face. First class bigots like you and Tyrannical deserve to be put in your place. I.e. back under the rocks from which you crawled.

Calling you a layabout is "bigoted?" Bigoted against what? Lazy people?

Disingenuous cunt. You know full well that my depression is one of the reasons why I can't get employment at the moment,

Oh, boo hoo. I never knew that you had "depression." But, here's a clue for you, sonny boy. There's a name for people that have issues like yours. It's called "everybody" and they meet down at the bar on Friday night.

as your previous bigoted quotes in this thread and the other thread have shown. I most certainly am not "lazy", and you using that term to describe someone who can't work at the moment because of medical reasons makes you a truly bigoted piece of shit.

Bigoted. That's rich. You grant yourself permission to call people every name in the book, but you want to be immune from being called a lazy layabout?

You are certainly able to argue endlessly on various internet forums. Maybe if you put those skills to good use on productive pursuits you'd be able to give your neighbor a rest. I hear he wants a vacation too.

So, you've called me various names, "fucking cunt," idiot, "fucking" this, and that, and now you're threatening me physically? I think you've committed crimes under Australian law, actually. Section 471.11(2), of the Criminal Code Act of 1995 makes it an offence to threaten me with serious bodily harm. There are probably other applicable provisions too.

God you are a little girl.

You whine like a stuck pig over someone insulting you for being a lazy layabout on the dole, and you have the temerity to call you out on making criminal threats of violence?

I'm bigoted for calling you lazy because you claim to be suffering from "depression" which means you can't do a god damn thing all day except all the things you really enjoy -- but, then you have no problem calling me a "little girl?" Your hypocrisy is showing. If you want to act like this, go to the "safe space" on Atheism Plus and they'll tell you all day long how much they understand all the things you're going through, poor baby.

I have an appointment in an hour, though, so I have to go.

To see the proctologist? Or perhaps to see a surgeon to get that giant chip removed off your shoulder?

What if it was? Is there a problem with going to competent medical professionals for medical checkups or procedures? Or, is it only your "depression" which is sacrosanct. Nobody joke about rEv being on the dole because he claims he just can't possibly do anything except drink beer and play games on the computer all day. However, the first chance he gets he will make fun of you for going to a proctologist. Yeah, funny, rEv. Real funny. :facepalm:

[Coito ergo sum]

That's exactly what I initially did in this thread, was to point out that this wacky police chief is not representative of the US ...

I went a bit further than that by mentioning Joh Bjelke-Petersen and Fred Nile. The first of these nutters was elected as Queensland's Premier - and stayed there for 19 years - by at least 19% of that state's electorate. The second became a member Of New South Wales' upper house and remains one decades later to this day. Over 9% of the NSW electorate keeps voting him back in.

Now, I am not saying that having a President who tells the public that he decided to send his soldiers into a war because God told him so is a sign of a rational society. I am merely agreeing that the USA does not by any measure have a monopoly on crazy, and I am saying that the two nutters I used as examples are not in office by virtue of some tiny, isolated zoo-like aberration of a community somewhere beyond the black stump; they were / are definitely and literally representative of a significant portion of Australians.

Agreed, 100%. I'm not the one who in any way claimed superiority on behalf of Merca and Merkans.... I'm not the one who said "oh, that would never happen in the US...." I'm not the one who refers to the US as a proper, civilized country while the rest of the world has a screw loose. It's that kind of thing that I've been tediously arguing against. And, I'm not saying you personally are doing that either, just to be clear on that. Others have and regularly do.

But, you succinctly made that point for me now, and i greatly appreciate it. Thanks again.

[pErvinalia]

Jeez rev, I've been reading this thread, and it seems you've lost it.

Are you ever going to make your point about what schools and "nutjob militants" have to do with each other?

Also, apparently everything is a "strawman" to you, which I find comical.

It's a strawman when a person argues against a made up version of what the other person said. As I've said, I never said public schools, and I was concerned with science classes. I don't know how much more plain this can be.

The only bigotry I've really seen from anyone has been from you.

How have I been bigoted?

You're getting so angry, but none of it seems to be justified. When I get angry in gun threads, it's because my life and liberty are being threatened. The only thing I've seen that's been threatened of yours, is maybe your ego.

I just happen to really hate bigotry. And he's developing a pattern.

I was mistaken in that you didn't explicitly mention my disability, however, as your quote in this thread shows, you know damn well why I am on the dole.

Don't confuse mental illness with disability. They aren't the same thing.

A mental illness can be a disability. Why on earth would you think it couldn't be??

[pErvinalia]

I DID NOT MENTION PUBLIC SCHOOLS. You linked an article that stated that creationism is taught in HISTORY CLASSES in Queensland as evidence that creationism is taught in schools here. BUT I SAID SCIENCE CLASSES. Retract your lies or go fuck yourself, you dishonest cunt.

O.k., I have already addressed this.

You wrote a pile of bollocks in response, with MORE lies. You claimed that I said "public" schools. I simply did not. I've asked you to quote it before, and you haven't, because you are a lying cunt.

Dude - who cares?

Who cares? I and others care, because you are dishonest. That's why I don't debate with you. You get shown how you have been wrong repeatedly, and then all you can muster in way of contrition is "who cares that I was wrong?". Like it's ok to be willfully wrong repeatedly if it doesn't matter in YOUR opinion. You are a dishonest debater. That's why I care.

[pErvinalia]

Ok, from this http://www.rationalia.com/forum/viewtop ... 22&t=44224 thread, you ridiculed me for being on the dole.

Don't you have to pick up your dole check?

I was mistaken in that you didn't explicitly mention my disability, however, as your quote in this thread shows, you know damn well why I am on the dole.

From this thread:

Aren't you the one on the dole because of your mental problems, or is that someone else?

So go fuck yourself. You are a lowlife piece of shit.

Lordy lordy, rEv, what in the hell are you on about?

I'm liable to report you, but I would think that by now, after the about a dozen insults, I would think one of the mods would take affirmative action here.

You called me:

fucking cunt
Bigoted cunt
lying cunt
Lowlife piece of shit
Idiot
Fucking idiot
Liar
Fucking liar
Scumbag
piece of shit


I mean - that's what remember just off the top of my head -- I'm sure there are repeats and other colorful and profane phrases you've used instead of just discussing the point. But, that's just you. Keep up the good work. Impressive.

And, you're upset with me for criticizing you for being on the dole, and asking you whether it was, in fact, you who were on the dole for some sort of mental problem? Come on. Grow up and stop it with this feigned outrage and stop crying like a little girl. You're embarrassing yourself.

You equate mental illness with laziness. You are an ablist piece of shit. Go fuck yourself.

[Seth]

I'm not an "ablist," I'm a Darwinist. Adapt or die.

[pErvinalia]

Yes, it crosses the line when it's something that is personal to you. LOL. Got it. THAT crosses the line, but the offensive stuff that you do, well, that's just good ol' fashioned vigorous debate. Got it.

There's a reason why racism/sexism/ablism/agism etc are considered worse than general name calling, arsewipe. You're a fucking scumbag for raising it TWICE. Once, I could forgive as a cheap shot. Twice is a pattern and shows that you are a bigoted cuntbag. And I'm somewhat pissed that the mods haven't given you a warning for it.

Quote me, tough guy. What's the blurb that has you so "outraged?" I can guarantee that you are not being entirely truthful about what I actually wrote. I'm sure you'll come up with a way not to do that, though. You probably "can't be arsed" and that, followed by a long line of expletives and insults.

I certainly don't respect an able-bodied person such as yourself who figures a way to get people to pay for his beer for him.

How in fucks name would you know how able-bodied or not I am? What an arrogant piece of shit you are!

By reading your posts and I've seen an image(s) of you on another thread, where you looked completely able bodies using your legs and limbs, etc.

You just can't admit that you make shit up, can you? How the fuck do you seriously defend the statement that you can tell how able bodied or not I am from reading a fucking internet post, or seeing a picture of me that contains my arms and legs?!? Are you on drugs? (no, of course you aren't on drugs. You are a dishonest cunt who will say anything to win a debate and avoid admitting that he was wrong).

But, if you tell me you're physically limited, I'd believe you.

Absolute bullshit you will. You already know that I am on the dole because of mental reasons, yet you chose to dismiss that and instead accuse me of being "lazy". Stop fucking lying, you douche. I also have a back injury which is also part of why I am on disability support, but I haven't mentioned this on the forum, so you are off the hook for knowing that. Not that it's any of your fucking business anyway.

And I will look for the quotes presently. Unfortunately, to find the previous thread, I'll have to read through pages and pages of the mind-numbing bollocks that tumbles unbridled out of your "brain".

I'll wait. If you go to a previous thread, be sure to link to the post because I frankly don't trust you to be honest.

Deflection, much? You are the one who has been repeatedly shown to be dishonest. If you can show where I've lied, then please do. Otherwise, own your own fucking words.

And, I did not bash you for whatever mental problem you may have. I bashed you because you're a layabout.

THREE times. Fuck off you bigoted wanker. If I ever meet you in person, I'm going to rearrange your face. First class bigots like you and Tyrannical deserve to be put in your place. I.e. back under the rocks from which you crawled.

Calling you a layabout is "bigoted?" Bigoted against what? Lazy people?

Disingenuous cunt. You know full well that my depression is one of the reasons why I can't get employment at the moment,

Oh, boo hoo.

There is it, you ablist piece of shit. You ought to be strongly warned by the mods for this shit.

I never knew that you had "depression."

So what "mental problem" did you think I had that caused me to be on the dole??? Stop lying you sack of shit.

But, here's a clue for you, sonny boy. There's a name for people that have issues like yours. It's called "everybody" and they meet down at the bar on Friday night.

Thanks for that anecdote.

as your previous bigoted quotes in this thread and the other thread have shown. I most certainly am not "lazy", and you using that term to describe someone who can't work at the moment because of medical reasons makes you a truly bigoted piece of shit.

Bigoted. That's rich. You grant yourself permission to call people every name in the book, but you want to be immune from being called a lazy layabout?

When you know that the reason I'm struggling to find work is partly because of a mental illness, then THAT'S ABLISM. Ablism, like other major category bigotries is rightly so considered far worse than name calling, as it strikes at the very heart of the person's being. There's nothing I can do about it (in the short term), so calling me lazy for a medical condition is terrible bigotry. You have confirmed to me that you are a lowlife piece of shit, barely above the level of Tyrannical.

So, you've called me various names, "fucking cunt," idiot, "fucking" this, and that, and now you're threatening me physically? I think you've committed crimes under Australian law, actually. Section 471.11(2), of the Criminal Code Act of 1995 makes it an offence to threaten me with serious bodily harm. There are probably other applicable provisions too.

God you are a little girl.

You whine like a stuck pig over someone insulting you for being a lazy layabout on the dole,

Because it's first class bigotry, and bigots are lowlife pieces of shit.

and you have the temerity to call you out on making criminal threats of violence?

You are such a little girl.

I'm bigoted for calling you lazy because you claim to be suffering from "depression" which means you can't do a god damn thing all day except all the things you really enjoy -- but, then you have no problem calling me a "little girl?" Your hypocrisy is showing.

You really need to learn about what bigotry is and why major bigotry is FAR worse than name calling. Stop pretending they are the same thing when they aren't. You are a bigoted cunt. Either accept that and try and change, or stay like Tyrannical for the rest of your life.

If you want to act like this, go to the "safe space" on Atheism Plus and they'll tell you all day long how much they understand all the things you're going through, poor baby.

Or how about you just stop being a bigoted arsewipe?

I have an appointment in an hour, though, so I have to go.

To see the proctologist? Or perhaps to see a surgeon to get that giant chip removed off your shoulder?

What if it was?

If it was, then I wouldn't rubbish you over it. You see, I'm not a bigot like you. I trade punches with my fellow debators, but I don't take a baseball bat to them while they are sitting down looking the other way. That's the equivalent cowardly act that you do when you attack the very core of a person's being. It's cowardly, because you wouldn't do it to my face, as I'd break your nose.

[pErvinalia]

I'm not an "ablist," I'm a Darwinist. Adapt or die.

I'm not talking about you. We all know what you are..