Without reading through all of it, it seems obvious that simulation isn't covered. They go to lengths to make it clear that the
image has to be clear and very explicit, with no opportunity for miss-interpretation.
It would be a HUGE extension to include simulation, as all of that seems to be aimed at the real, graphic, explicit, injurious porn.
That's not saying I wouldn't LIKE better porn laws. I'm just doubtful about the practicality of doing it, or doing it fairly.
It would be a lot more work for the courts.
I think, if there was an element included in the offence, of PAYING to download or view it, it would help.
After all, it's money that mainly motivates and enables the worst porn. If you pay, you are colluding in it's production. Retrospectively. So if you make a payment, having been informed what it is you are buying, it should massively increase the seriousness of the offence.
I would certainly vote for that.