Guess The No 10 Love Rats?

[cronus]

I find it hard to believe it's that.

Oh I know, it's the daily mail right? I wonder if they're talking about the rumours about Princess Diana secretly dating that guy who's Dad owns Harrods.

Stretches the imagination doesn't it....? Boris & Samantha....?

[Audley Strange]

I'd be more likely to believe Anne Widdicombe and Dappi.

[Rum]

There is no publicly known injunction in place as of now as far as I can see. Which makes me wonder if the Mail are testing the 'super-injunction' rule which allows one to be taken out but that fact is also secret.

Sheer speculation but it would be a way of testing that dreadful law.

[Xamonas Chegwé]

Interesting how everyone is jumping to a male/female tryst. It could be Osbourne and Cleggy.

[Pappa]

Why should anyone care about politicians having affairs? It's completely irrelevent.

[Trinity]

I guess Kate and William have both becided on Gok Wan as their sex partner and the Mail has found out he's a illegal immigrant and a Europhile Single Mother.

I dreamt I was lusting over Gok last night. I am now confused. Probably because I haven't had sex in 6 months and I've forgotten what a man looks like.
On a more relative note, no one can out do the utter cringe-worthy union of the grey man Major and egg lady. *shiver*

[Xamonas Chegwé]

Prince Edward & Gok Wan. Now that could raise a few eyebrows...

[cronus]

Names

Trigger Warning!!!1! :

Trigger Warning!!!1! :

Trigger Warning!!!1! :

Trigger Warning!!!1! :

[Audley Strange]

Rebecca Brookes and Andy Coulson while he was working for Camoron.

That's a guess by the way just in case the Internet Fascists decide to come calling. A guess.

[Rum]

Why should anyone care about politicians having affairs? It's completely irrelevent.

Social animals/gossip.

[Audley Strange]

Why should anyone care about politicians having affairs? It's completely irrelevent.

I think I mentioned that it could be relevant. Say for example one of the Swivel eyed loons who was anti-gay marriage was having a homosexual affair. Its not so much about their private lives as it is whether we deem them trustworthy to be our servants. There are a number of reasons I can think of, but they only apply in cases of national betrayal and hypocrisy, otherwise it is as Rum somewhat says, people love the Spectacle.

[Trinity]

It would be wholly satisfying to see another hypocrite's faux pas disclosed although nothing much would change dramatically- couple of resignations, disowning by fellow colleagues and feeble apologies.

[PsychoSerenity]

Why should anyone care about politicians having affairs? It's completely irrelevent.

It's just another pointless distraction from actual politics.

[Thinking Aloud]

Why should anyone care about politicians having affairs? It's completely irrelevent.

It's just another pointless distraction from actual politics.

Which in itself often seems to be a pointless distraction from reality.

[Cormac]

Hmmm. I'm not sure it is in the public interest, yet. Problem is it's the sort of judgement that can only be made after such names are revealed, which defeats the point. Gossip about People's love lives are not in the public interest, but if it is a matter where such a person and who exists on their reputation, is revealed as being hypocritical then it is, since we need to know whether or not they can be trusted to be voted for.

I'm wondering now rather if the individuals were not the partners of Members of the Cabinet. Duhn Duhn DUUUUUUUHHHN!!!!

Emerging gossip has Boris and Samantha as favourites. If so that is most definitely a public interest story.

It may of course all be utter bull.

Even if true. I don't see how it would be a public interest story, unless one of them was aggressively promoting or "defending" "family values" and the "sanctity of marriage".