No one said ethnic anything, this timeGawdzilla Sama wrote:Ethnic cleansing, it works bitches!Tyrannical wrote:It's a shame Russia wasn't more successful in Chechnya, as only a thorough cleansing of Islamic influences will fix it.

No one said ethnic anything, this timeGawdzilla Sama wrote:Ethnic cleansing, it works bitches!Tyrannical wrote:It's a shame Russia wasn't more successful in Chechnya, as only a thorough cleansing of Islamic influences will fix it.
You did.Tyrannical wrote:No one said ethnic anything, this timeGawdzilla Sama wrote:Ethnic cleansing, it works bitches!Tyrannical wrote:It's a shame Russia wasn't more successful in Chechnya, as only a thorough cleansing of Islamic influences will fix it.
I never said I thought this had anything to do with US foreign policy. Not sure if that's what you are trying to insinuate.Ian wrote: Of course Sandi types have brought up US/western military action overseas and how it surely must create more terrorists than it destroys, etc (though I kinda doubt these guys were personally pissed about that).
Ian wrote:Thy blanket is wet.
But do you in fact think that? At least in part?sandinista wrote:I never said I thought this had anything to do with US foreign policy. Not sure if that's what you are trying to insinuate.Ian wrote: Of course Sandi types have brought up US/western military action overseas and how it surely must create more terrorists than it destroys, etc (though I kinda doubt these guys were personally pissed about that).
JimC wrote:We need, no doubt, to analyse possible factors that generate terrorist acts. Sandinista and others on the left, from 2001 onwards, have brought up US and/or western military actions overseas, particularly in Islamic countries. There is little doubt that recruitment into terrorist activities has been facilitated and increased; every drone strike into Pakistan that kills women and children is a potent recruitment poster...
But some, a little like mistermack with his ancient tales from the troubles, imbue possible causes with an emotion dangerously close to satisfaction, a kind of "sow the breeze, reap the whirlwind" with extra helpings of schadenfreude...
We need some degree of separation; the condemnation of acts of terrorism such as in Boston should not be undermined with "your turn now" ugliness.
But neither should we stop at least questioning, and more probably opposing the unethical use of military power in its current US form, with its callous disregard for the lives of civilians caught in the drone missile crossfire.
Scrumple wrote:Maybe the US should invade Chechnya and bomb the rubble there to send a message, though?
Ian wrote:It'll be interesting to hear what, if anything, the kid says now that he's in custody.
In the meantime, people are just projecting their own belief systems onto what this kid's motivation might have been. Of course Sandi types have brought up US/western military action overseas and how it surely must create more terrorists than it destroys, etc (though I kinda doubt these guys were personally pissed about that). Of course mistermack, having a thing about the IRA, brings up the historical footnote of the IRA drawing some of its US funding from the Boston area and sports a reap-what-you-sow sort of schadenfreude (which says nothing about Boston and less about these bombers, just about mistermack). And since it hasn't been mentioned yet, I'll sum up one right-wing line of thought I've heard from somewhere (which I do not really agree with either): these guys, like many Chechens, were frustrated with the lack of intervention or even interest from the US on behalf of their country's struggle against harsh Russian occupation, and they sought some combination of revenge and attention for their homeland's plight. Or, it might be something else entirely.
How about we just wait to hear what the young jerk has to say for himself?
To the Islamic fundamentalist mindset, Russia, the US, the West all blend into one, a set of infidel enemies to be struck down without mercy...Cormac wrote:Scrumple wrote:Maybe the US should invade Chechnya and bomb the rubble there to send a message, though?
Not a good idea. It is Russia's military playground, where attrocities such as these are carried out by Russia regularly.
really too early to form an opinion.JimC wrote:But do you in fact think that? At least in part?sandinista wrote:I never said I thought this had anything to do with US foreign policy. Not sure if that's what you are trying to insinuate.Ian wrote: Of course Sandi types have brought up US/western military action overseas and how it surely must create more terrorists than it destroys, etc (though I kinda doubt these guys were personally pissed about that).
Because it's not something to dismiss out of hand...
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 28 guests