Guns Because

Guns don't kill threads; Ratz kill threads!
Post Reply
User avatar
Jason
Destroyer of words
Posts: 17782
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:46 pm
Contact:

Re: Guns Because

Post by Jason » Fri Mar 22, 2013 4:04 am

Shhh.. don't shatter their nationalistic delusions Groper.

:whisper: They've got the guns now.

User avatar
Gallstones
Supreme Absolute And Exclusive Ruler Of The World
Posts: 8888
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:56 am
About me: A fleck on a flake on a speck.

Re: Guns Because

Post by Gallstones » Tue Apr 02, 2013 11:22 pm

Montana Governor signed Senate Bill 145 into law Thurs 03.28.13
The governor also signed a bill Thursday sought by gun advocates that would make the state's list of concealed weapon permit holders confidential.
Senate Bill 145, introduced by state Senator Frederick Moore (R-20), provides important confidentiality and privacy protection for concealed weapon permit holders. SB 145 passed in the state Senate by a 37 -13 vote on January 31 and passed in the state House by an 88-9 vote on March 13.
But here’s the thing about rights. They’re not actually supposed to be voted on. That’s why they’re called rights. ~Rachel Maddow August 2010

The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74084
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Guns Because

Post by JimC » Wed Apr 03, 2013 12:02 am

Just a little easier to gun someone down in Montana...

Crazy fucks...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

Seth
GrandMaster Zen Troll
Posts: 22077
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:02 am
Contact:

Re: Guns Because

Post by Seth » Wed Apr 03, 2013 2:00 am

JimC wrote:Just a little easier to gun someone down in Montana...

Crazy fucks...
Please explain how keeping ccw permit information confidential to law enforcement makes it easier to gun someone down in Montana.

All it does is keep hoplophobe zealots from infringing on the privacy of law-abiding citizens who have gone to the trouble of getting a permit.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S

"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth

© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.

User avatar
Blind groper
Posts: 3997
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 3:10 am
About me: From New Zealand
Contact:

Re: Guns Because

Post by Blind groper » Wed Apr 03, 2013 2:10 am

To Seth

I have demonstrated earlier, with proper references, that states with significant numbers of concealed carry permits have a higher rate of gun crime than states without.

While I appreciate that the Great Gun Fraud, John Lott, has claimed the opposite, that claim has not stood up to peer review.
For every human action, there is a rationalisation and a reason. Only sometimes do they coincide.

Seth
GrandMaster Zen Troll
Posts: 22077
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:02 am
Contact:

Re: Guns Because

Post by Seth » Wed Apr 03, 2013 2:20 am

Blind groper wrote:To Seth

I have demonstrated earlier, with proper references, that states with significant numbers of concealed carry permits have a higher rate of gun crime than states without.

While I appreciate that the Great Gun Fraud, John Lott, has claimed the opposite, that claim has not stood up to peer review.
No you haven't. You just think you have.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S

"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth

© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.

User avatar
orpheus
Posts: 1522
Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 12:43 am
About me: The name is Epictetus. Waldo Epictetus.
Contact:

Re: Guns Because

Post by orpheus » Wed Apr 03, 2013 3:10 am

Seth wrote:
Blind groper wrote:To Seth

I have demonstrated earlier, with proper references, that states with significant numbers of concealed carry permits have a higher rate of gun crime than states without.

While I appreciate that the Great Gun Fraud, John Lott, has claimed the opposite, that claim has not stood up to peer review.
No you haven't. You just think you have.
Oh, now that's a devastating rejoinder.

:roll:

User avatar
Blind groper
Posts: 3997
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 3:10 am
About me: From New Zealand
Contact:

Re: Guns Because

Post by Blind groper » Wed Apr 03, 2013 3:16 am

orpheus wrote: Oh, now that's a devastating rejoinder.
Just standard Seth debating technique.

"You are wrong!"

"No, I am right."

"No, you are wrong."

"No, I am right."

Does that remind you of something? Like a couple of kids squabbling? Intelligence and rational thinking need to be a part of it.
For every human action, there is a rationalisation and a reason. Only sometimes do they coincide.

User avatar
Blind groper
Posts: 3997
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 3:10 am
About me: From New Zealand
Contact:

Re: Guns Because

Post by Blind groper » Wed Apr 03, 2013 3:17 am

Blind groper wrote:
orpheus wrote: Oh, now that's a devastating rejoinder.
Just standard Seth debating technique.

"You are wrong!"

"No, I am right."

"No, you are wrong."

"No, I am right."

Does that remind you of something? Like a couple of kids squabbling? Intelligence and rational thinking need not be a part of it.
For every human action, there is a rationalisation and a reason. Only sometimes do they coincide.

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Guns Because

Post by Coito ergo sum » Wed Apr 03, 2013 3:08 pm

Blind groper wrote:To Seth

I have demonstrated earlier, with proper references, that states with significant numbers of concealed carry permits have a higher rate of gun crime than states without.

While I appreciate that the Great Gun Fraud, John Lott, has claimed the opposite, that claim has not stood up to peer review.
This has not actually been demonstrated, as far as I can tell. What references are you referring to? Many states with very liberal gun laws have low gun crime rates, like New Hampshire, Vermont, North Dakota, Iowa, Idaho, Maine, Utah, South Dakota, Montana, Colorado, Washington, etc.

Seth
GrandMaster Zen Troll
Posts: 22077
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:02 am
Contact:

Re: Guns Because

Post by Seth » Wed Apr 03, 2013 3:46 pm

orpheus wrote:
Seth wrote:
Blind groper wrote:To Seth

I have demonstrated earlier, with proper references, that states with significant numbers of concealed carry permits have a higher rate of gun crime than states without.

While I appreciate that the Great Gun Fraud, John Lott, has claimed the opposite, that claim has not stood up to peer review.
No you haven't. You just think you have.
Oh, now that's a devastating rejoinder.

:roll:
It's all the claim is worth.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S

"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth

© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.

Seth
GrandMaster Zen Troll
Posts: 22077
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:02 am
Contact:

Re: Guns Because

Post by Seth » Wed Apr 03, 2013 3:48 pm

Blind groper wrote:
orpheus wrote: Oh, now that's a devastating rejoinder.
Just standard Seth debating technique.

"You are wrong!"

"No, I am right."

"No, you are wrong."

"No, I am right."

Does that remind you of something? Like a couple of kids squabbling? Intelligence and rational thinking need to be a part of it.
Problem is that I've presented numerous arguments that you simply ignore or elide, the primary argument being that the right to individual self defense is not subject to statistical analysis of the abusive use of firearms. You've never once bothered to address this because you know you can't make a cogent argument for disarming one person because of the bad behavior of another.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S

"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth

© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.

Seth
GrandMaster Zen Troll
Posts: 22077
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:02 am
Contact:

Re: Guns Because

Post by Seth » Wed Apr 03, 2013 3:50 pm

Coito ergo sum wrote:
Blind groper wrote:To Seth

I have demonstrated earlier, with proper references, that states with significant numbers of concealed carry permits have a higher rate of gun crime than states without.

While I appreciate that the Great Gun Fraud, John Lott, has claimed the opposite, that claim has not stood up to peer review.
This has not actually been demonstrated, as far as I can tell. What references are you referring to? Many states with very liberal gun laws have low gun crime rates, like New Hampshire, Vermont, North Dakota, Iowa, Idaho, Maine, Utah, South Dakota, Montana, Colorado, Washington, etc.
He pointed to a single study from Harvard, from a well-known anti-gun activist, that claims that Lott and Kleck's work is faulty. Lott, however, addressed all the claims made and debunked them by showing that the statistic analysis of the opposition was fraudulent.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S

"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth

© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.

User avatar
Gallstones
Supreme Absolute And Exclusive Ruler Of The World
Posts: 8888
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:56 am
About me: A fleck on a flake on a speck.

Re: Guns Because

Post by Gallstones » Wed Apr 03, 2013 5:49 pm

Montana House Bill 228 04.09]

A lot of Montana gun law is contained in this Bill. Some might find this an informative and/or interesting read.

For example:
Section 9. Justifiable use of force -- burden of proof. In a criminal trial, when the defendant has offered evidence of justifiable use of force, the state has the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant's actions were not justified.
The link is to the text of the last amendment to SECTIONS 45-3-103, 45-8-321, AND 46-6-502, MCA
It includes the previous text as strikeout and the new text.

So, how many people have been "gunned down"--legally under this statute--since April 2009?
How many firearm homicides has there been during that time?

This source only mentions murders and does not break them down by weapon or means.

Per 100K
2009 3.3
2010 2.5
2011 2.8


I don't see any increase in "gunning downs" that might corrolate with Montana Castle Doctrine.
But here’s the thing about rights. They’re not actually supposed to be voted on. That’s why they’re called rights. ~Rachel Maddow August 2010

The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter

User avatar
Blind groper
Posts: 3997
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 3:10 am
About me: From New Zealand
Contact:

Re: Guns Because

Post by Blind groper » Wed Apr 03, 2013 8:31 pm

Coito ergo sum wrote:
This has not actually been demonstrated, as far as I can tell. What references are you referring to? Many states with very liberal gun laws have low gun crime rates, like New Hampshire, Vermont, North Dakota, Iowa, Idaho, Maine, Utah, South Dakota, Montana, Colorado, Washington, etc.
The Washington Post points out that gun crimes have been falling over the past few years. This happened some time after concealed carry laws were issued, which permitted gun nuts like John Lott to claim cause and effect. But, the same drop in crime has happened all over the world and in many American states where no concealed carry laws were enacted, which makes those conclusions garbage.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fac ... _blog.html
For every human action, there is a rationalisation and a reason. Only sometimes do they coincide.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests