Guns used for lawful self defense Pt. 4

Guns don't kill threads; Ratz kill threads!
Locked
User avatar
Blind groper
Posts: 3997
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 3:10 am
About me: From New Zealand
Contact:

Re: Guns used for lawful self defense Pt. 4

Post by Blind groper » Sat Mar 16, 2013 9:00 pm

Gallstones

Easy to calculate.

Take : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_violen ... ted_States

Quote :

"In 2009, according to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, 66.9% of all homicides in the United States were perpetrated using a firearm.[5] There were 52,447 deliberate and 23,237 accidental non-fatal gunshot injuries in the United States during 2000.[6] Two-thirds of all gun-related deaths in the United States are suicides. In 2010, there were 19,392 firearm-related suicide deaths, and 11,078 firearm-related homicide deaths in the United States."

Add these numbers together to give more than 100,000 people each year to receive a bullet.
Then a simple calculation given 320 million people in the US, plus an average lifetime of 75 years, and the result is 1 in 50 people who will receive a bullet some time in their life time.

If you want to check this, do the sum yourself.
For every human action, there is a rationalisation and a reason. Only sometimes do they coincide.

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74149
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Guns used for lawful self defense Pt. 4

Post by JimC » Sat Mar 16, 2013 9:15 pm

Gallstones wrote:
Făkünamę wrote:The 'Sturmgewehr' or 'Assault Rifle' was the name given to it by Adolf Hitler.. but how is that relevant?
It's relevent because the term "assault" is still being used as a propaganda tool and is being applied to firearms that aren't factually assault. They have a look.

Just a bit of history for anyone who would get a little education to mix in with the opinions.
All and any of my arguments for banning semi-automatic centre fire rifles with high capacity magazines don't depend on pedantic word definitions.

These are a class of weapons that are unnecessary to a serious hunter, but perfect for a mass murderer of human beings.
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
Woodbutcher
Stray Cat
Stray Cat
Posts: 8302
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:54 pm
About me: Still crazy after all these years.
Location: Northern Muskeg, The Great White North
Contact:

Re: Guns used for lawful self defense Pt. 4

Post by Woodbutcher » Sat Mar 16, 2013 10:52 pm

Gallstones wrote:
Woodbutcher wrote:
Gallstones wrote:1 in 50 Americans will be shot in their lifetime you say. Does this figure include suicide?
He said " will have a bullet pass through their body". Yes, it also includes suicides, and we do know how compassionate you and Seth are about mental sickness leading to suicide. You would have made first class nazis, you two. You would have fought against the allies! :funny:
I think something has pushed you off your rocker. :?
Sorry, but at most three people on this forum consider you to be sane. I go with the majority with this, since at least one of those three is a fucking lunatic. Take your pills like a good girl now, and consider the sexually pleasing esthetics of your handguns.Only they will be with you to the end, all others will fail you.
If women don't find you handsome, they should at least find you handy.-Red Green
"Yo". Rocky
"Never been worried about what other people see when they look at me". Gawdzilla
"No friends currently defined." Friends & Foes.

User avatar
Gallstones
Supreme Absolute And Exclusive Ruler Of The World
Posts: 8888
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:56 am
About me: A fleck on a flake on a speck.

Re: Guns used for lawful self defense Pt. 4

Post by Gallstones » Sat Mar 16, 2013 11:32 pm

Woodbutcher wrote:
Gallstones wrote:
Woodbutcher wrote:
Gallstones wrote:1 in 50 Americans will be shot in their lifetime you say. Does this figure include suicide?
He said " will have a bullet pass through their body". Yes, it also includes suicides, and we do know how compassionate you and Seth are about mental sickness leading to suicide. You would have made first class nazis, you two. You would have fought against the allies! :funny:
I think something has pushed you off your rocker. :?
Sorry, but at most three people on this forum consider you to be sane. I go with the majority with this, since at least one of those three is a fucking lunatic. Take your pills like a good girl now, and consider the sexually pleasing esthetics of your handguns.Only they will be with you to the end, all others will fail you.
Are you channeling aspire now? 'Cause it's convincing.

Have y'all been talking about me? :FIO:
Where is this Gallstones sanity poll? I'd like to vote.
But here’s the thing about rights. They’re not actually supposed to be voted on. That’s why they’re called rights. ~Rachel Maddow August 2010

The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter

aspire1670
Posts: 318
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:37 pm

Re: Guns used for lawful self defense Pt. 4

Post by aspire1670 » Sun Mar 17, 2013 12:37 am

Gallstones wrote:
Woodbutcher wrote:
Gallstones wrote:
Woodbutcher wrote:
Gallstones wrote:1 in 50 Americans will be shot in their lifetime you say. Does this figure include suicide?
He said " will have a bullet pass through their body". Yes, it also includes suicides, and we do know how compassionate you and Seth are about mental sickness leading to suicide. You would have made first class nazis, you two. You would have fought against the allies! :funny:
I think something has pushed you off your rocker. :?
Sorry, but at most three people on this forum consider you to be sane. I go with the majority with this, since at least one of those three is a fucking lunatic. Take your pills like a good girl now, and consider the sexually pleasing esthetics of your handguns.Only they will be with you to the end, all others will fail you.
Are you channeling aspire now? 'Cause it's convincing.

Have y'all been talking about me? :FIO:
Where is this Gallstones sanity poll? I'd like to vote.
It would be nice to have your vote but it would hardly be fair to you. You have an impulse control disorder and you wouldn't be able to resist the urge to do something harmful to yourself such as voting in favour of a motion that "Gallstones believes that any number of gun deaths is an acceptable price for others to pay for Gallstones pitiful firearms fetish".
All rights have to be voted on. That's how they become rights.

User avatar
FBM
Ratz' first Gritizen.
Posts: 45327
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:43 pm
About me: Skeptic. "Because it does not contend
It is therefore beyond reproach"
Contact:

Re: Guns used for lawful self defense Pt. 4

Post by FBM » Sun Mar 17, 2013 12:41 am

hadespussercats wrote:This is a reminder from the staff to all thread participants to please remember our "Play Nice" rule, and to focus attacks on arguments, not people. Thanks.
:coffee:
"A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it." ~ H. L. Mencken

"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."

"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."

User avatar
JacksSmirkingRevenge
Grand Wazoo
Posts: 13516
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 6:56 pm
About me: Half man - half yak.
Location: Perfidious Albion
Contact:

Re: Guns used for lawful self defense Pt. 4

Post by JacksSmirkingRevenge » Sun Mar 17, 2013 1:17 am

:pop:
Sent from my Interositor using Twatatalk.

User avatar
Jason
Destroyer of words
Posts: 17782
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:46 pm
Contact:

Re: Guns used for lawful self defense Pt. 4

Post by Jason » Sun Mar 17, 2013 1:42 am

Woodbutcher wrote:
Gallstones wrote:
Woodbutcher wrote:
Gallstones wrote:1 in 50 Americans will be shot in their lifetime you say. Does this figure include suicide?
He said " will have a bullet pass through their body". Yes, it also includes suicides, and we do know how compassionate you and Seth are about mental sickness leading to suicide. You would have made first class nazis, you two. You would have fought against the allies! :funny:
I think something has pushed you off your rocker. :?
Sorry, but at most three people on this forum consider you to be sane. I go with the majority with this, since at least one of those three is a fucking lunatic. Take your pills like a good girl now, and consider the sexually pleasing esthetics of your handguns.Only they will be with you to the end, all others will fail you.
No warning for this? Really?

Fine. You're acting like a world-class cunt Woodbutcher.

User avatar
FBM
Ratz' first Gritizen.
Posts: 45327
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:43 pm
About me: Skeptic. "Because it does not contend
It is therefore beyond reproach"
Contact:

Re: Guns used for lawful self defense Pt. 4

Post by FBM » Sun Mar 17, 2013 1:48 am

Staff are discussing this, Faku. Don't be shy about hitting the 'report' button if you see something that looks like a rule violation. :tup:
"A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it." ~ H. L. Mencken

"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."

"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."

User avatar
Bella Fortuna
Sister Golden Hair
Posts: 79685
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:45 am
About me: Being your slave, what should I do but tend
Upon the hours and times of your desire?
I have no precious time at all to spend,
Nor services to do, till you require.
Location: Scotlifornia
Contact:

Re: Guns used for lawful self defense Pt. 4

Post by Bella Fortuna » Sun Mar 17, 2013 2:57 am

Seth, this is a warning for this post http://www.rationalia.com/forum/viewtop ... 2#p1396132 which is a personal attack on another member. Any further such posts will lead to a suspension. Please follow the rules and refrain from attacking other members.
Sent from my Bollocksberry using Crapatalk.
Image
Food, cooking, and disreputable nonsense: http://miscreantsdiner.blogspot.com/

User avatar
Bella Fortuna
Sister Golden Hair
Posts: 79685
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:45 am
About me: Being your slave, what should I do but tend
Upon the hours and times of your desire?
I have no precious time at all to spend,
Nor services to do, till you require.
Location: Scotlifornia
Contact:

Re: Guns used for lawful self defense Pt. 4

Post by Bella Fortuna » Sun Mar 17, 2013 2:58 am

Sent from my Bollocksberry using Crapatalk.
Image
Food, cooking, and disreputable nonsense: http://miscreantsdiner.blogspot.com/

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: Guns used for lawful self defense Pt. 4

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Sun Mar 17, 2013 11:20 am

Any further interruptions of rants will result in a staff member or two being suspendered.
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
rainbow
Posts: 13758
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2012 8:10 am
About me: Egal wie dicht du bist, Goethe war Dichter
Where ever you are, Goethe was a Poet.
Location: Africa
Contact:

Re: Guns used for lawful self defense Pt. 4

Post by rainbow » Mon Mar 18, 2013 12:42 pm

JimC wrote:
Gallstones wrote:
Făkünamę wrote:The 'Sturmgewehr' or 'Assault Rifle' was the name given to it by Adolf Hitler.. but how is that relevant?
It's relevent because the term "assault" is still being used as a propaganda tool and is being applied to firearms that aren't factually assault. They have a look.

Just a bit of history for anyone who would get a little education to mix in with the opinions.
All and any of my arguments for banning semi-automatic centre fire rifles with high capacity magazines don't depend on pedantic word definitions.

These are a class of weapons that are unnecessary to a serious hunter, but perfect for a mass murderer of human beings.
...and since most guns deaths are suicides - it would appear that they aren't likely to be of any better for that either.
I call bullshit - Alfred E Einstein
BArF−4

Seth
GrandMaster Zen Troll
Posts: 22077
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:02 am
Contact:

Re: Guns used for lawful self defense Pt. 4

Post by Seth » Mon Mar 18, 2013 5:41 pm

Bella Fortuna wrote:Seth, this is a warning for this post http://www.rationalia.com/forum/viewtop ... 2#p1396132 which is a personal attack on another member. Any further such posts will lead to a suspension. Please follow the rules and refrain from attacking other members.
But of course you wouldn't think of issuing the same threat to Woodbutcher, who provoked the post with multiple personal attacks. He just gets a "play nice" warning.

Same old biased moderation shit, different day.

Do look up the word "ethics" in the dictionary and study the definitions thereof, for they seem to be entirely unknown to you.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S

"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth

© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.

Seth
GrandMaster Zen Troll
Posts: 22077
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:02 am
Contact:

Re: Guns used for lawful self defense Pt. 4

Post by Seth » Mon Mar 18, 2013 5:49 pm

orpheus wrote:
Seth wrote:
orpheus wrote: So you contend that if they had
fired on federal officers earlier, if they had wanted to start a war, then they'd have won against the Feds? :lol: 
Not at all. In war, people die. The point I was making was that Waco is not a good example of what the citizenry, once aroused and mustered, can do to put down a tyrannical government.

But Koresh and his people beat the shit out of the BATF assault teams, forcing them to retreat in ignominious humiliation. And the only way Reno could get them out of their compound was to murderously incinerate them all, thus making them martyrs.
Which of course lead DIRECTLY to the killing of more than 230 people in OK city by people outraged at the slaughter in Waco.
Debatable. Can you show a direct causal chain?
Not debatable at all. Just look at the record, McVeigh admitted he did it as revenge for Waco and Ruby Ridge. Direct connection.
How'd that work out for the feds?
In terms of fighting power? Feds are still here. Koresh et al aren't. 
Eighty people at Waco died. More than 230 died in Oklahoma city. 3 to 1 kill ratio. Wouldn't take long for the feds to give up if every encounter went that way, as the Russians discovered in Afghanistan. Federal cops don't want to get killed for Marxist drivel, neither do our soldiers, who swear allegiance to the Constitution and therefore the citizenry, not the President or anyone else.

I didn't say any particular individual or individual's would survive a revolution, but the nation would, and the tyrant would be deposed. That's all that's important.
So what you're actually saying is that guns aren't enough. In order to accomplish your goal, you're in favor of citizens having the right to bombs as well.
They already have that. A "bomb" (explosive or incendiary device like a hand-grenade or explosive firearm round) is defined as a "destructive device" under the NFA, and all you have to do to own one legally is file the Form 4 paperwork and pay the $200 tax per device...and meet the storage requirements of both the state and federal government which require proper storage in an approved explosives magazine. In fact, to own dynamite, det cord and other explosives like ammonium nitrate mixed with diesel fuel (ANFO - what Tim McVeigh used in Oklahoma City) used in mining, industry or agriculture (farmers) you don't even need to register under NFA, you just have to have a federal explosives license and a state permit.

Firearms alone might not be enough to win, but without them there is no chance whatsoever. And that's the point that our Founders clearly understood when they forbade Congress and the states (through the 14th Amendment) from infringing on our right to keep and bear arms...a pre-existing natural right not granted by government.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S

"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth

© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests