Connecticut (et al)

Post Reply
User avatar
Blind groper
Posts: 3997
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 3:10 am
About me: From New Zealand
Contact:

Re: Connecticut (et al)

Post by Blind groper » Sat Dec 29, 2012 8:11 pm

Seth wrote:What you hoplophobes fail to understand is that the PRIMARY (though not exclusive) purpose of the 2nd Amendment is to protect military arms and the people's right to keep and bear them in order to provide an effective (well regulated) militia.
The wording of the second amendment gives military use as the only purpose of the amendment.

Since the nation no longer needs civilian militias, the entire purpose of the second amendment is now obsolete.
For every human action, there is a rationalisation and a reason. Only sometimes do they coincide.

User avatar
Jason
Destroyer of words
Posts: 17782
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:46 pm
Contact:

Re: Connecticut (et al)

Post by Jason » Sat Dec 29, 2012 8:14 pm

But groper, what if the US Army is overrun, the Navy sunk, the Airforce downed, and the National Guard obliterated by hordes of commy-marxists? The last best defense must be armed citizens.

User avatar
Blind groper
Posts: 3997
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 3:10 am
About me: From New Zealand
Contact:

Re: Connecticut (et al)

Post by Blind groper » Sat Dec 29, 2012 8:25 pm

To Faku

I understand your concerns. The numerous hostile invisible pink unicorns are descending on us, ready to attack, as I write.
For every human action, there is a rationalisation and a reason. Only sometimes do they coincide.

User avatar
laklak
Posts: 21022
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:07 pm
About me: My preferred pronoun is "Massah"
Location: Tannhauser Gate
Contact:

Re: Connecticut (et al)

Post by laklak » Sat Dec 29, 2012 8:41 pm

The 2nd isn't going to be repealed in my or my kids lifetimes. They'll get their assault weapons and magazine ban, but they'll grandfather existing weapons, just like the last time. Only thing it will do is make the existing weapons and magazines that much more valuable (just like the last time) and smart people will make a shitload of money.

Time to bulk order AR mags.
Yeah well that's just, like, your opinion, man.

User avatar
Jason
Destroyer of words
Posts: 17782
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:46 pm
Contact:

Re: Connecticut (et al)

Post by Jason » Sat Dec 29, 2012 8:56 pm

I'd suggest an amnesty period of 6 months where US citz can turn in their assault weapons and high cap magazines and receive a gift voucher good for $100 at Bed, Bath, and Beyond. Following the amnesty period, mandatory minimum sentences should be put in place for anyone in possession of an assault weapon or high capacity magazine. Warrants should be issued for police to search the premises of persons suspected of possessing, trafficking, or manufacturing this contraband with the same restrictions placed on the granting of a warrant for other purposes (no anti-gun Gestapo). Minimum sentences should scale to the nature of the infraction: More assault weapons/HC mags -> longer minimum sentence. Or perhaps a minimum fine/jail sentence combination. Say 3 years for possessing one high cap magazine or a $30,000 fine.

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74303
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Connecticut (et al)

Post by JimC » Sat Dec 29, 2012 9:00 pm

Făkünamę wrote:I'd suggest an amnesty period of 6 months where US citz can turn in their assault weapons and high cap magazines and receive a gift voucher good for $100 at Bed, Bath, and Beyond. Following the amnesty period, mandatory minimum sentences should be put in place for anyone in possession of an assault weapon or high capacity magazine. Warrants should be issued for police to search the premises of persons suspected of possessing, trafficking, or manufacturing this contraband with the same restrictions placed on the granting of a warrant for other purposes (no anti-gun Gestapo). Minimum sentences should scale to the nature of the infraction: More assault weapons/HC mags -> longer minimum sentence. Or perhaps a minimum fine/jail sentence combination. Say 3 years for possessing one high cap magazine or a $30,000 fine.
Though I think it's a good idea, politically it would never, ever fly...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
Blind groper
Posts: 3997
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 3:10 am
About me: From New Zealand
Contact:

Re: Connecticut (et al)

Post by Blind groper » Sat Dec 29, 2012 9:01 pm

To Faku

What a shame that you are not making the law!
For every human action, there is a rationalisation and a reason. Only sometimes do they coincide.

User avatar
klr
(%gibber(who=klr, what=Leprageek);)
Posts: 32964
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 1:25 pm
About me: The money was just resting in my account.
Location: Airstrip Two
Contact:

Re: Connecticut (et al)

Post by klr » Sat Dec 29, 2012 9:03 pm

Făkünamę wrote:But groper, what if the US Army is overrun, the Navy sunk, the Airforce downed, and the National Guard obliterated by hordes of commy-marxists? The last best defense must be armed citizens.
I suspect the above is most likely a rhetorical question, but ...

If someone is capable of doing all the above - including neutralising or destroying the nuclear arsenal - then they won't be bothered by civilians armed with nothing "more" than assault weapons. They probably wouldn't think twice without responding with massive force, and would not have the least regard for casualties amongst unarmed civilians. Ditto for destruction of dwellings and all manner of civil infrastructure.
God has no place within these walls, just like facts have no place within organized religion. - Superintendent Chalmers

It's not up to us to choose which laws we want to obey. If it were, I'd kill everyone who looked at me cock-eyed! - Rex Banner

The Bluebird of Happiness long absent from his life, Ned is visited by the Chicken of Depression. - Gary Larson

:mob: :comp: :mob:

User avatar
Jason
Destroyer of words
Posts: 17782
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:46 pm
Contact:

Re: Connecticut (et al)

Post by Jason » Sat Dec 29, 2012 9:04 pm

Pretty much. A civilian militia is a bad joke.

User avatar
Blind groper
Posts: 3997
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 3:10 am
About me: From New Zealand
Contact:

Re: Connecticut (et al)

Post by Blind groper » Sat Dec 29, 2012 9:07 pm

Făkünamę wrote:Pretty much. A civilian militia is a bad joke.
Conclusion : So is the second amendment.
For every human action, there is a rationalisation and a reason. Only sometimes do they coincide.

User avatar
laklak
Posts: 21022
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:07 pm
About me: My preferred pronoun is "Massah"
Location: Tannhauser Gate
Contact:

Re: Connecticut (et al)

Post by laklak » Sat Dec 29, 2012 9:13 pm

Even Diane Feinstein's proposed ban doesn't outlaw existing weapons, and she's as virulent anti-gunner as there is. They know that won't fly. It does prohibit "sale or transfer", so all that will happen is a thriving black market in high capacity mags and weapons. Prices will go SKY fucking high. Doesn't matter what laws they pass, actually, if laws did any good at all I wouldn't be able to drive a few blocks and buy cocaine on the street corner or hire a prostitute, purchase an unregistered gun with no serial numbers or get a new TV and stereo for $100.
Yeah well that's just, like, your opinion, man.

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: Connecticut (et al)

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Sat Dec 29, 2012 9:14 pm

Făkünamę wrote:But groper, what if the US Army is overrun, the Navy sunk, the Airforce downed, and the National Guard obliterated by hordes of commy-marxists? The last best defense must be armed citizens.
And what if said citizens had made it clear that they were looking out for themselves and fuck everybody else?
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
Ian
Mr Incredible
Posts: 16975
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 6:42 pm
Location: Washington DC

Re: Connecticut (et al)

Post by Ian » Sat Dec 29, 2012 9:27 pm

laklak wrote:Even Diane Feinstein's proposed ban doesn't outlaw existing weapons, and she's as virulent anti-gunner as there is. They know that won't fly. It does prohibit "sale or transfer", so all that will happen is a thriving black market in high capacity mags and weapons. Prices will go SKY fucking high. Doesn't matter what laws they pass, actually, if laws did any good at all I wouldn't be able to drive a few blocks and buy cocaine on the street corner or hire a prostitute, purchase an unregistered gun with no serial numbers or get a new TV and stereo for $100.
If prices go SKY fucking high, how thriving do you suppose that black market is going to be? And how willing are most would-be owners going to risk buying one on that market? Some would, but some future 20-something ne'er-do-well whacko who has his mind set on shooting up a movie theater might have to make do with something else. And if so, then perhaps the body count wouldn't be so high when he does.

That only seems like a baby step in the right direction, but it's worth taking. And it's not about crushing the precious freedom of gun enthusiasts, it's about re-assessing what it practical. The 2nd Amendment was not intended to mean that anybody who wants to buy an AR-15 should legally be allowed to do so any more than it means that anybody who wants to buy a howitzer should legally be allowed to do so. It's all about where Uncle Sam draws the line, and many people would like to see plenty of currently-legal firearms on the other side of that line.

User avatar
Jason
Destroyer of words
Posts: 17782
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:46 pm
Contact:

Re: Connecticut (et al)

Post by Jason » Sat Dec 29, 2012 9:39 pm

laklak wrote:Even Diane Feinstein's proposed ban doesn't outlaw existing weapons, and she's as virulent anti-gunner as there is. They know that won't fly. It does prohibit "sale or transfer", so all that will happen is a thriving black market in high capacity mags and weapons. Prices will go SKY fucking high. Doesn't matter what laws they pass, actually, if laws did any good at all I wouldn't be able to drive a few blocks and buy cocaine on the street corner or hire a prostitute, purchase an unregistered gun with no serial numbers or get a new TV and stereo for $100.
So what you're saying is that, after all the public outrage and demand for real preventative action to be taken, John Q. Public is going to be pacified by a few half-measures that won't accomplish anything at all?

User avatar
laklak
Posts: 21022
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:07 pm
About me: My preferred pronoun is "Massah"
Location: Tannhauser Gate
Contact:

Re: Connecticut (et al)

Post by laklak » Sat Dec 29, 2012 10:26 pm

That's precisely what I'm saying, it's what has happened every time in the past and I see no difference now. John Q. Public will forget all about it as soon as Kim Kadashian gets knocked up or American Idol comes back on. Then there's the Super Bowl coming up, which is (apparently) the single most important event on the planet.
Yeah well that's just, like, your opinion, man.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests