Restricting constitutional feeedoms.

Post Reply
User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: Restricting constitutional feeedoms.

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Wed Dec 26, 2012 11:10 pm

MrJonno wrote:
Făkünamę wrote:Would you be OK with guns if they were marketed as promoting hand-eye coordination rather than self-defence? :ask:
Hiring guns to use at a sports club and fire at non human targets is fine by me (British laws on this are a little excessive but nothing in life is perfect)
Ayaan likes to do that.
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
pErvinalia
On the good stuff
Posts: 60971
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:08 pm
About me: Spelling 'were' 'where'
Location: dystopia
Contact:

Re: Restricting constitutional feeedoms.

Post by pErvinalia » Wed Dec 26, 2012 11:12 pm

Coito ergo sum wrote:
MrJonno wrote:
"Come on, Little Johnny! I'm going to teach you to box today and do some basic moves to help you if some school bully comes after you." --- Mr. Jonno calls the police and Child Protection Services, because dad wants to "encourage" Little Johnny to be able to handle a bully. "No, no, Little Johnny," says Mr. Jonno,"you're supposed just sit there and take it, and if the police don't come, the ambulance will be sure to scoop you up and take you to the hospital promptly."sad
I would say any parent that encourage their child to hit a bully was an appalling parent and almost certainly a bully themselves
LOL -- nonsense. What I was referring to was encouraging a child to defend themselves if a bully tries to hit them. That seems to be a distinction you are either not grasping, or ignoring.
yeah, no shit!
MrJonno wrote:
Nothing to do with authortarian mind control , its to do with restricting commercial adverstising which has some pretty strict controls in the UK and at least some in the US
Bullshit. Where's the "advertising" in a parent teaching their child self-defence skills?
Sent from my penis using wankertalk.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.

User avatar
laklak
Posts: 21022
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:07 pm
About me: My preferred pronoun is "Massah"
Location: Tannhauser Gate
Contact:

Re: Restricting constitutional feeedoms.

Post by laklak » Wed Dec 26, 2012 11:15 pm

I'd just give the kid pepper spray and a .38 snubnose in an ankle holster. Come at me, bro.
Yeah well that's just, like, your opinion, man.

Seth
GrandMaster Zen Troll
Posts: 22077
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:02 am
Contact:

Re: Restricting constitutional feeedoms.

Post by Seth » Thu Dec 27, 2012 4:28 am

Făkünamę wrote:I installed a 72" plasma TV a few years ago.. Major pain the in the ass to move, let alone get it up on the wall.

If I was a thief in a home where I knew the residents were home at the time I'd choose small items of value. Maybe come back a few weeks later with a van and three buddies to steal the TV when the family is gone on vacation.
I installed a Zenith plasma 72" display at my studio for a DVD editing project. It was one of the first plasma displays that large on the market. Cost about $14,000. Lasted two years before the plasma display went wonky. Fuck. $7,000 a year. Fuck.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S

"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth

© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.

Seth
GrandMaster Zen Troll
Posts: 22077
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:02 am
Contact:

Re: Restricting constitutional feeedoms.

Post by Seth » Thu Dec 27, 2012 4:30 am

MrJonno wrote:Basically most martial arts including boxing are not suitable for urban self defence, no harder to mug Mike Tyson than me, you go up to him and stick a knife at his throat ask for his wallet. In fact I would put my chances higher of not getting hurt as I would hand it over without an argument and he is more likely to be suffering from excessive testosterone than me

So I'm not sure you can prepare for self defence only falsely try to get other people to
I strongly encourage you to do that to Mike Tyson to test your theory. Or me. At least then you'll be out of our hair and we won't have to read your ridiculous and pathetic claptrap.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S

"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth

© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.

User avatar
FBM
Ratz' first Gritizen.
Posts: 45327
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:43 pm
About me: Skeptic. "Because it does not contend
It is therefore beyond reproach"
Contact:

Re: Restricting constitutional feeedoms.

Post by FBM » Thu Dec 27, 2012 4:47 am

MrJonno wrote:Basically most martial arts including boxing are not suitable for urban self defence, no harder to mug Mike Tyson than me, you go up to him and stick a knife at his throat ask for his wallet. In fact I would put my chances higher of not getting hurt as I would hand it over without an argument and he is more likely to be suffering from excessive testosterone than me

So I'm not sure you can prepare for self defence only falsely try to get other people to
:funny: :funny: :funny: :funny:




[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-xpdR6s8kJk&gl=GB[/youtube]



"A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it." ~ H. L. Mencken

"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."

"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: Restricting constitutional feeedoms.

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Thu Dec 27, 2012 12:42 pm

Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
Tero
Just saying
Posts: 51691
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
About me: 8-34-20
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Restricting constitutional feeedoms.

Post by Tero » Thu Dec 27, 2012 2:41 pm

Seth edits videos? Gun videos? :D

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Restricting constitutional feeedoms.

Post by Coito ergo sum » Thu Dec 27, 2012 3:18 pm

MrJonno wrote:
Făkünamę wrote:Would you be OK with guns if they were marketed as promoting hand-eye coordination rather than self-defence? :ask:
Hiring guns to use at a sports club and fire at non human targets is fine by me (British laws on this are a little excessive but nothing in life is perfect)
Why? They're training to be better shooters, and nothing can come of that. :{D

User avatar
FBM
Ratz' first Gritizen.
Posts: 45327
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:43 pm
About me: Skeptic. "Because it does not contend
It is therefore beyond reproach"
Contact:

Re: Restricting constitutional feeedoms.

Post by FBM » Thu Dec 27, 2012 3:27 pm

:hehe:
"A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it." ~ H. L. Mencken

"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."

"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Restricting constitutional feeedoms.

Post by Coito ergo sum » Thu Dec 27, 2012 3:30 pm

MrJonno wrote:I would not what to see an advert like the one below, don't think much can be done to regulated web adverts, but anything in print like this should be banned

http://www.ukselfdefence.com/
Um, why?

People can't print what they like? Can't have arguably truthful points of view freely published?

Like I said -- yours is an authoritarian view, arch-conservative. Couldn't be further right than that, when it comes to free speech. Welcome to the Right Wing.

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Restricting constitutional feeedoms.

Post by Coito ergo sum » Thu Dec 27, 2012 3:34 pm

MrJonno wrote:Basically most martial arts including boxing are not suitable for urban self defence, no harder to mug Mike Tyson than me, you go up to him and stick a knife at his throat ask for his wallet. In fact I would put my chances higher of not getting hurt as I would hand it over without an argument and he is more likely to be suffering from excessive testosterone than me
I don't get this. So what if YOU would just hand over your wallet? Who cares? Just because YOU would do that, does that mean everyone else must do that too? A person walking along need not hand over his belongings to all that ask for it - this is not Jesus-land where everyone just forsakes their possessions and turns the other cheek no matter who slaps them. You are free to practice your weird belief any way you want, but please, fuck off with the Christians and let the rest of us live our lives as we see fit too.

MrJonno wrote: So I'm not sure you can prepare for self defence only falsely try to get other people to
It's only arguably false. You opine that it's not possible to prepare for self-defense. There are definitely arguments and evidence showing that people can, in fact, prepare for self-defense. Your mere declaration that it is "false" is just that - your own view of it, backed up by nothing.

MrJonno
Posts: 3442
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 7:24 am
Contact:

Re: Restricting constitutional feeedoms.

Post by MrJonno » Thu Dec 27, 2012 6:29 pm

People can't print what they like?
No , not in the UK, not in the US not anywhere

Now what they can and can't print is up to debate, but I start of with the position that sometimes it is justify as does every nation does on Earth does
When only criminals carry guns the police know exactly who to shoot!

Seth
GrandMaster Zen Troll
Posts: 22077
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:02 am
Contact:

Re: Restricting constitutional feeedoms.

Post by Seth » Thu Dec 27, 2012 6:34 pm

Tero wrote:Seth edits videos? Gun videos? :D
Yes, in point of fact I do, although not that one.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S

"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth

© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Restricting constitutional feeedoms.

Post by Coito ergo sum » Thu Dec 27, 2012 8:56 pm

MrJonno wrote:
People can't print what they like?
No , not in the UK, not in the US not anywhere

Now what they can and can't print is up to debate, but I start of with the position that sometimes it is justify as does every nation does on Earth does
The context of what I wrote was arguably truthful information. In the US, any opinion is protected and any information that is truthful, and almost all information that is "false" (absent a sliver of material that rises to the level of injurious frauds) and injurious libels to nonpublic figures.

The idea that someone can't print a document saying "learn karate for self defense" is odd indeed. I mean, in the US, the ACLU successfully defended the North American Man-Boy Love Associaton (NAMBLA) and the American Nazi Party and their rights to publish their ideas on fucking little boys and anti-Jew respectively. Not sure how much closer to absolute free speech you can get.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 23 guests