No, but you're sort of making a valid point. The problem is not the tools available, it's the culture that spawns these psychopaths.Animavore wrote:If what you say is true we would be seeing psychopaths going on rampages all around the World in countries with strict gun laws using bombs made from fertilizer and such. Yet we don't....Făkünamę wrote:Psychopaths are very motivated and often take the time to carefully and deliberately lay out their plans. See shooting at Batman movie for example
27 dead at Connecticut school, including 14 kids
Re: 27 dead at Connecticut school, including 14 kids
Re: 27 dead at Connecticut school, including 14 kids
Look, this is very upsetting, but this sort of emotive response does nothing to further discussion. If you want to vent, do it on someone else.macdoc wrote:They are not tools - fuck off with the euphemisms....they are deadly weapons that have no place in modern society.
Usual gun lover crap spewing forth,
-
- Posts: 32040
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: 27 dead at Connecticut school, including 14 kids
Animavore wrote:
Fucking parasite!
So -- because other people said "we don't want you in our schools", god sat by and let 27 people die, including 18 kids who never had the opportunity to invite or uninvite god into the classroom....?
Put this guy on the fucking list of people I wish I could piss on. What a fucking monster this piece of garbage is. Fuck you, you fucking piece of fucking fish shit on the bottom of the ocean. Kill yourself, now. (referring to the guy on the video)
- orpheus
- Posts: 1522
- Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 12:43 am
- About me: The name is Epictetus. Waldo Epictetus.
- Contact:
Re: 27 dead at Connecticut school, including 14 kids
Wrong. It works only some of the time. Very often it does not work at all.Făkünamę wrote:Wrong. Psychological profiling. It works.orpheus wrote:One problem is that gun advocates will always blame the shooter and say we need to enforce existing gun control laws so they aren't sold to nutjobs. But that's unrealistic; most of the time we can only identify a nutjob after they've done something like this.
Moreover, even you were right, are the background checks to buy a gun really sophisticated enough to be called "psychological profiling"?
-
- Posts: 32040
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: 27 dead at Connecticut school, including 14 kids
Evidence?Scrumple wrote:Violence in the media entrains the susceptible into these ways of thinking.
- Svartalf
- Offensive Grail Keeper
- Posts: 41178
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: Paris France
- Contact:
Re: 27 dead at Connecticut school, including 14 kids
baseball bat? monkey wrench? decorative candlestick? kitchen knives?Bella Fortuna wrote:Which is someone more likely to pick up impulsively and use?
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
Re: 27 dead at Connecticut school, including 14 kids
It works quite well in my experience. Perhaps it depends on how thorough it is. I had to be profiled when I got my federal clearance back when.orpheus wrote:Wrong. It works only some of the time. Very often it does not work at all.Făkünamę wrote:Wrong. Psychological profiling. It works.orpheus wrote:One problem is that gun advocates will always blame the shooter and say we need to enforce existing gun control laws so they aren't sold to nutjobs. But that's unrealistic; most of the time we can only identify a nutjob after they've done something like this.
Moreover, even you were right, are the background checks to buy a gun really sophisticated enough to be called "psychological profiling"?
No, the background checks involved in becoming a gun owner in the United States are grossly deficient, to put it mildly, and besides illegal guns are easily obtained anywhere in the world.
- cronus
- Black Market Analyst
- Posts: 18122
- Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2012 7:09 pm
- About me: Illis quos amo deserviam
- Location: United Kingdom
- Contact:
Re: 27 dead at Connecticut school, including 14 kids
I'm not saying all are susceptible but amplifying the effects of a dysfunctional upbringing in a certain minority doesn't take rocket science to know the effects...the outcomes...Coito ergo sum wrote:Evidence?Scrumple wrote:Violence in the media entrains the susceptible into these ways of thinking.
http://crx.sagepub.com/content/21/4/516.abstract
What will the world be like after its ruler is removed?
- Gerald McGrew
- Posts: 611
- Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 5:32 pm
- About me: Fisker of Men
- Location: Pacific Northwest
- Contact:
Re: 27 dead at Connecticut school, including 14 kids
Reports are now that the shooter's mom worked at the school, and he shot her first then went on his rampage.
Clearly a very fucked up individual.
Clearly a very fucked up individual.
If you don't like being called "stupid", then stop saying stupid things.
- Gerald McGrew
- Posts: 611
- Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 5:32 pm
- About me: Fisker of Men
- Location: Pacific Northwest
- Contact:
Re: 27 dead at Connecticut school, including 14 kids
The problem is, a background check and a psychological profile are not the same thing. Background checks just look into criminal histories and histories of mental illness. Conducting a psychological profile for every prospective gun owner would be very different indeed. The main issue with that (besides the logistics) is we have a Constitution that defines gun ownership as an inherent right. As a result being able to own a gun is the default status, so it becomes rather difficult to argue "You must first prove your mental health before exercising your Constitutional right".Făkünamę wrote:It works quite well in my experience. Perhaps it depends on how thorough it is. I had to be profiled when I got my federal clearance back when.
No, the background checks involved in becoming a gun owner in the United States are grossly deficient, to put it mildly, and besides illegal guns are easily obtained anywhere in the world.
If you don't like being called "stupid", then stop saying stupid things.
-
- Posts: 318
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:37 pm
Re: 27 dead at Connecticut school, including 14 kids
*facepalm*Făkünamę wrote:No, but you're sort of making a valid point. The problem is not the tools available, it's the culture that spawns these psychopaths.Animavore wrote:If what you say is true we would be seeing psychopaths going on rampages all around the World in countries with strict gun laws using bombs made from fertilizer and such. Yet we don't....Făkünamę wrote:Psychopaths are very motivated and often take the time to carefully and deliberately lay out their plans. See shooting at Batman movie for example
And that culture would be the gun culture. Crikey, you're not the sharpest knife in the drawer.
All rights have to be voted on. That's how they become rights.
Re: 27 dead at Connecticut school, including 14 kids
It is very strange that a person may be denied their constitutional right to bear arms on the basis of past mental illness, but to conduct a psychological profile to determine if they pose a danger to themselves or others (the basis of disqualification for past mental illnesses I believe) before becoming a gun owner is said to be unconstitutional. Clearly there are provisos for denying this constitutional right in place, why must mental illness first be demonstrated for them to be exercised?Gerald McGrew wrote:The problem is, a background check and a psychological profile are not the same thing. Background checks just look into criminal histories and histories of mental illness. Conducting a psychological profile for every prospective gun owner would be very different indeed. The main issue with that (besides the logistics) is we have a Constitution that defines gun ownership as an inherent right. As a result being able to own a gun is the default status, so it becomes rather difficult to argue "You must first prove your mental health before exercising your Constitutional right".Făkünamę wrote:It works quite well in my experience. Perhaps it depends on how thorough it is. I had to be profiled when I got my federal clearance back when.
No, the background checks involved in becoming a gun owner in the United States are grossly deficient, to put it mildly, and besides illegal guns are easily obtained anywhere in the world.
Re: 27 dead at Connecticut school, including 14 kids
No, that's symptomatic of the larger problem.aspire1670 wrote:*facepalm*Făkünamę wrote:No, but you're sort of making a valid point. The problem is not the tools available, it's the culture that spawns these psychopaths.Animavore wrote:If what you say is true we would be seeing psychopaths going on rampages all around the World in countries with strict gun laws using bombs made from fertilizer and such. Yet we don't....Făkünamę wrote:Psychopaths are very motivated and often take the time to carefully and deliberately lay out their plans. See shooting at Batman movie for example
And that culture would be the gun culture. Crikey, you're not the sharpest knife in the drawer.
- orpheus
- Posts: 1522
- Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 12:43 am
- About me: The name is Epictetus. Waldo Epictetus.
- Contact:
Re: 27 dead at Connecticut school, including 14 kids
Something else just occurred to me. To those who contend that guns are not the problem; that people would just kill with other implements: why don't we see those incidents then? If there's nothing special about guns, we should also see comparable numbers of murders and mass murders from other weapons. But we don't.
Wonder why that is.
Wonder why that is.
Re: 27 dead at Connecticut school, including 14 kids
Let me try to straighten out your warped perception of this line of argument. When I say guns are not the problem, I mean they are not the causative factor. The availability of guns is the reason they are used, yes. But the reason tragedies like this occur is not because of the tools employed. Thus they are not the problem. Remove the tools, the problem remains. Guns did not make this man do what he did, he used them to do it.orpheus wrote:Something else just occurred to me. To those who contend that guns are not the problem; that people would just kill with other implements: why don't we see those incidents then? If there's nothing special about guns, we should also see comparable numbers of deaths - intentional and accidental - from other weapons. But we don't.
Wonder why that is.
Sometimes I wonder if anti-gun people understand the concept of causality at all.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests