Corruption in Alberta, Canada, 'Mafia' or someone else...

[Jason]

And then there's this!

womaninyellow.png

[BrettA]

Go to his website link, where he's bashing Ratz for encouraging him to get mental health care...

C'mon now Seth, you're just using a term like "bashing" because I pointed out that your post in the graphic was the most idiotic, aren't ya?

And yeah, they are pretty sweet, huh Pord?

[BrettA]

Oh, but Pord... please feel free to post your own pics, but kindly cease posting mine... Thanks evah so much!

[Jason]

Oh, but Pord... please feel free to post your own pics, but kindly cease posting mine... Thanks evah so much!

Hmmm.. no.

[BrettA]

Oh, but Pord... please feel free to post your own pics, but kindly cease posting mine... Thanks evah so much!

Hmmm.. no.

Well, gee - I did say 'please' :-). And 'kindly' :-). Plus I'm a fellow Ratz! I bet that you're the only Ratzite that would disregard such a polite request... rather callously, too!

[BrettA]

Yeah, right. Rum's with the Mafia. Geez...

Yeah, right. I used his quote that he's an "Obsessive hater of all things feminist" and you interpreted that, how?

Good job, TA - I'm proud of ya, son!

[Jason]

Oh, but Pord... please feel free to post your own pics, but kindly cease posting mine... Thanks evah so much!

Hmmm.. no.

Well, gee - I did say 'please' :-). And 'kindly' :-). Plus I'm a fellow Ratz! I bet that you're the only Ratzite that would disregard such a polite request... rather callously, too!

Fine. But I'm still downloading the ones I deem spank bank worthy.

I have a wanking system - start off with sexy pics, then move into softcore like two chicks making out, then more serious foreplay, full on fucking (in whatever form), big O (best when the chicks cream), and I'm spent.

I will use some of your pics for this purpose at my discretion.

[BrettA]

Aw, thanks, Pord. Most appreciated :-)! And just curious - is the young lady in red that you posted included in that? You know, the one that you 'voiced' a concern regarding her age?

[Jason]

She's over 16 right?

I was also being facetious about her age.

[BrettA]

She's over 16 right?

I was also being facetious about her age.

Well, I don't see how her age - or any model's age - is any of your business. Now, are you going to answer my question?

[Rum]

Well Brett, as you appear to be getting a bit personal in the face of what was an attempt to jolt you into seeking help I shall return the favour. Firstly please make no further reference to myself in any of your future posts. Please do not quote me or anything I post, especially my sig, which with your current preoccupations you may well have missed is meant ironically.

And as the gloves appear to be off, I am beginning to suspect you are building up a case for getting involved with this 'under age' issue using the excuse that you were mentally ill at the time.

Now kindly fuck off.

[BrettA]

LOL - the best defence attempt is an offence, huh? Nice jump, though :-). Pord?

[Rum]

LOL - the best defence attempt is an offence, huh? Nice jump, though :-). Pord?

Being mentally ill is no real excuse for being a total idiot and all round twat...as a general rule, rather than being specific about your good self.

On your scary web site you refer to my sig as having 'gone', which indeed it has. it 'went' something like a week ago, long before I saw your posts here as it had outlived its relevance.

You are suffering from paranoid delusions and quite possibly schizophrenia. You should seek help.

[BrettA]

LOL - the best defence attempt is an offence, huh? Nice jump, though :-). Pord?

Being mentally ill is no real excuse for being a total idiot and all round twat...as a general rule, rather than being specific about your good self.

On your scary web site you refer to my sig as having 'gone', which indeed it has. it 'went' something like a week ago, long before I saw your posts here as it had outlived its relevance.

You are suffering from paranoid delusions and quite possibly schizophrenia. You should seek help.

Tomorrow, Rum, tomorrow (though I'm not sure 'help' is quite the right word). One can only try to do the right thing so long and then...

Update: The past few days have been 'interesting' on a variety of fronts, most notably trying to get this information in hard-copy to two RCMP locations on the 27th. At the Calgary office, I was pretty sure there was an 'envelope switch' by the front desk attendant and I doubt it will get anywhere worthwhile (his card - given to me at my request - lacked all personal details... notably name of course). And I do have more info on this, also of course.

At the Airdrie office, I arrived just after it closed so went to the back parking lot and was assisted by a woman who was leaving the building and went back in to get an officer. When he came out - boy, they sure get ticked when you even drive into their lot! - he sent me to the main entrance to use the phone to the right of the doors*. I spoke to someone who wanted verbal details - I effectively said that it was too complex for verbal details - and after several tedious rounds of this she told me specifically to wait in my car and someone would show unless 10 minutes rolled by, in which case they were too busy to help now. Indeed the front lights went on and someone went to the door, but then left, not seeing my car (she did say the car,. not the door). Another officer came out the main doors looking like he was leaving and knew nothing about this, but as soon as I mentioned the possibility of risqué photography of a 14-year old, his demeanour changed radically and we went back in through the (now unlocked) doors. Long story short, he misrepresented what I'd written time and again and then the only thing he would accept is the 14-year-old girl's name, despite me repeatedly saying that much context was needed (as just one example, I'd informed her Mom of the girl's mistake and therefore her name need not ever come up with police in the context of requesting risque photography shoots - even if someone might want that). Anyway, I was to phone him back and - since he'd just given his last business card away - wrote on my card. Gee, these Mountie types sure do have a problem with business cards, it seems! I left.

From a personal perspective, most of my fund request emails disappeared so I asked my bank's never-very-subtle MJ for documentation since the start of 2010. My take is that there'd be no evidence of me asking for funds from the bank and I might 'have had' monies elsewhere (that may no longer the case and I suspect that changes about any issue are possible - and others to be roundly refuted with of course, witnesses and 'evidence' to the contrary). I see this tying in to MJ's repeated pushes for me to check into a major Maui(?) hotel in 2010 so I could get a replacement Visa card… I crashed in my car or on the beach in most cases and MJ said that it couldn't be sent to FexEd, Purolator, another bank or a hotel I wasn't staying at (until it was clear that there was no way I'd do as he wanted, but that took a while ;-) ). If the context isn't obvious, I'll hopefully get the chance to expound. Also, this one's an example of infiltrating an institution, whereby the next institution of the same type I visited seems to be an example of corrupting front-line staff (both mentioned in the larger post above). Edit - 8 hours later: Of course, these emails tend to come and go as per my: "I suspect that changes about any issue are possible" - they're back at least in the inbox... for now ;-). But some emails to a Kamloops woman are not there... erm... for now. This could get even funner so I won't bother to keep updating with every change :-).

I also distributed copies to photographers at a meeting, even when the meeting lead - SN - very quietly 'suggested' that I place the papers on the back table. Interestingly, SN came over to my place with more helpful suggestions on the paper. Well, only one concrete suggestion which was to get rid of the reference to the housing connection, even though it was speculative and only one sentence in the whole 8 pages. More generally he didn't like all the notes on my graphics and thought I should just have the base graphics with no 'interpretation'. He did offer that the rest of what I wrote would be generally unbelievable - especially in Calgary - so we had some agreement there :-). Being now comfortable that there was some connection between SN and 'them', at least I was able to voice my opinion on their abject cowardice on a person to person basis and I thought a closer connection to them might be nice so minimally, I could state the same to this larger set of sub-humanity. SN is even less subtle than MJ noted in the prev para - but not unlike BR and the very similar CFC clowns (explanation hopefully to come, if needed). Speaking of subtlety, it's as if they received training from an overActra - jk, jk - member (maybe even one I know :-) )!

There are other points I'll just make reference to: certain Wildwood homes I delivered these briefs to in the past few days, being pointed to the top 2 floors of Bio Sciences when looking for U of C's Faculty of Law yesterday (and questionable correction - even though accurate), being in the Timmies there, having more hard evidence stolen ('Keep His Evidence Circumstantial'), links that have been shortened and go to other than the intended URL, light-heated threads of little consequence on sulphuric acid, Polonium 210 and more, my 'misplacing' all USB 3 cables, my phone book 'issues', fun facts re my toilet (and similarly, a silly beeper in my van a while back - both def LOLable), a temporary inability to post in certain FB groups of which I'm a member, etc., etc. And AK just asked for a CD - possibly interesting in a certain likely rattly context - but maybe nothing at all (reversals throughout). - Brett Aubrey

* I suspect I would have actually noticed a phone box the first time, but who knows (this in case there is no phone)?

[Jason]

Pord?

What? I have nothing more to say, you're apparently immune to humour and, gloves off, seemingly going or already have gone quite mad. I know that's not a nice thing to say, but everyone in this thread has already been more than nice.