The wall of shame - right wingdings got it real wrong

[macdoc]

http://punditshaming.tumblr.com

actually sounds like a few wishful thinkers here

we could chart these clowns in 2016 and figure to come pretty close to the opposite result as the real outcome

[klr]

I'm sure someone will remind the world of this in 2016, but it might make no difference. I'd say the people who listen to these sorts of pollsters don't do so because they make accurate predictions, but because they say what their audience wants to hear.

[Gerald McGrew]

Just saw this morning that Dick Morris is back on Fox opining about why Republicans lost. So yeah...no repercussions at all for being horrible at your job. Good work if you can get it I guess.

[Tero]

The Republicans lost because they sent a white rich guy, a well known pit bull, once again. Nobody likes white rich guys, least of all their wives.

[Gerald McGrew]

Conservatives still can't accept or get over the fact that they lost the election...

http://www.cnn.com/2012/11/20/politics/ ... ?hpt=po_c1

Washington (CNN) -- Step by step, die-hard conservatives are confronting their grief over President Barack Obama's re-election.
But judging from blog posts and other public pronouncements, many remain stuck somewhere between denial and anger, very far from acceptance.
So far this week, prolific blogger Judson Phillips on Tea Party Nation has called for boycotting the Electoral College to prevent validating the election result and lamented the triumph of liberalism in destroying national unity and therefore America's greatness...

...Instead, the initial reactions and subsequent attempts to explain what happened sought scapegoats, such as what right-wing critics describe as a deficient Republican challenger in Mitt Romney, electoral theft or a liberal-dominated media industry that is part of a broader Marxist effort dating back decades to undermine the nation.

On November 10, Phillips alleged that more votes than registered voters in several Florida precincts were part of Democratic efforts to "steal the election" against West. There was no immediate posting Tuesday in response to West's concession...

...On Sunday, Phillips proposed an action plan -- getting Electoral College voters in states won by Romney to boycott the validation of the election result by the December 17 deadline.

"The 12th Amendment specifies the quorum or the necessary number of states for the College to act, is 2/3," Phillips wrote. "In other words, if 17 states refuse to participate, the Electoral College does not have a quorum."

Without a quorum to decide the presidency, he continued, the Republican-led U.S. House will decide and presumably choose Romney. Phillips acknowledged such a move would set a "dangerous precedent," but added that "the situation is so grim we really have no other choice."

"Does anyone really believe America can survive four more years of Barack Obama?" he wrote, saying the president will seek to "transform America from that shining city on a hill into a third world shantytown, with massive unemployment and a corrupt government."

There's your Republican Party folks....

[Gerald McGrew]

Looks like Romney may finish with 47% of the vote. Seems appropriate....

[Gerald McGrew]

‘Unskewed Polls’ founder sets up site claiming Obama stole the election

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing- ... e-election

Dean Chambers, the man behind the “Unskewed Polls” website, has a launched a new website declaring the election was stolen by Democrats.

The website, www.BarackOFraudo.com, identifies four “black states” Chambers claims were stolen by President Obama through massive voter fraud and suppression operations. According to the website, Democratic ballot stuffing was the reason Obama carried the critical swing states of Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia and Florida.

The website provides no evidence for the allegations, other than to say that “Democrats are known for years for stuffing the ballot boxes,” and says that in this case, circumstantial evidence is sufficient.

Nothing in modern conservatism makes sense except in the light of creationism.

[Seth]

Conservatives still can't accept or get over the fact that they lost the election...

http://www.cnn.com/2012/11/20/politics/ ... ?hpt=po_c1

Washington (CNN) -- Step by step, die-hard conservatives are confronting their grief over President Barack Obama's re-election.
But judging from blog posts and other public pronouncements, many remain stuck somewhere between denial and anger, very far from acceptance.
So far this week, prolific blogger Judson Phillips on Tea Party Nation has called for boycotting the Electoral College to prevent validating the election result and lamented the triumph of liberalism in destroying national unity and therefore America's greatness...

...Instead, the initial reactions and subsequent attempts to explain what happened sought scapegoats, such as what right-wing critics describe as a deficient Republican challenger in Mitt Romney, electoral theft or a liberal-dominated media industry that is part of a broader Marxist effort dating back decades to undermine the nation.

On November 10, Phillips alleged that more votes than registered voters in several Florida precincts were part of Democratic efforts to "steal the election" against West. There was no immediate posting Tuesday in response to West's concession...

...On Sunday, Phillips proposed an action plan -- getting Electoral College voters in states won by Romney to boycott the validation of the election result by the December 17 deadline.

"The 12th Amendment specifies the quorum or the necessary number of states for the College to act, is 2/3," Phillips wrote. "In other words, if 17 states refuse to participate, the Electoral College does not have a quorum."

Without a quorum to decide the presidency, he continued, the Republican-led U.S. House will decide and presumably choose Romney. Phillips acknowledged such a move would set a "dangerous precedent," but added that "the situation is so grim we really have no other choice."

"Does anyone really believe America can survive four more years of Barack Obama?" he wrote, saying the president will seek to "transform America from that shining city on a hill into a third world shantytown, with massive unemployment and a corrupt government."

There's your Republican Party folks....

Great plan! I didn't know about that little quirk in the Electoral College and I hope to fuck the Republicans make it happen. Unlikely, but we're down to last-ditch measures to preserve the Republic now, and the next series of measures involve lots of people dying.

[Animavore]

and the next series of measures involve lots of people dying.

Yes. All those old coots in the Republican party. They must have, what? Eight? Ten years left in them?

[Kristie]

and the next series of measures involve lots of people dying.

Yes. All those old coots in the Republican party. They must have, what? Eight? Ten years left in them?

One can only hope.

[rasetsu]

Reading the book "Nonbeliever Nation" which charts some of the absurdities fomented by religious conservatives. One of which, also documented in books such as Goldberg's "Kingdom Coming", is a studied anti-intellectualism, an aversion to any process or source which might refute the chosen narrative. This is ultimately expressed in the cloistering of conservatives and the religious, to avoid hearing a message which might disagree with theirs. This underlies separate vocabularies, separate news sources, separate media, separate schools (home schooling, ala Michelle Bachmann), and separate process (anything which disagrees with their narrative is simply outright disowned, from the electoral college, to history, to education, to even science and epistemology).

It reminds me of something Thunderf00t said in a video, that perhaps the only real contribution to society [of religion] was the feel good factor it provided for people who would rather be happy than right. Armed on the one hand with a heady brew of wishful thinking, and on the other hand with a corporate edifice, both commercial and ecclesiastical, willing to cater to their desire not to know unpleasant things, an entire generation has stepped off the path of what's good and what's true into the epistemic briar patch of "whatever I want to believe because I want it."

(And there's Seth, right on cue.)

[Seth]

Reading the book "Nonbeliever Nation" which charts some of the absurdities fomented by religious conservatives. One of which, also documented in books such as Goldberg's "Kingdom Coming", is a studied anti-intellectualism, an aversion to any process or source which might refute the chosen narrative. This is ultimately expressed in the cloistering of conservatives and the religious, to avoid hearing a message which might disagree with theirs. This underlies separate vocabularies, separate news sources, separate media, separate schools (home schooling, ala Michelle Bachmann), and separate process (anything which disagrees with their narrative is simply outright disowned, from the electoral college, to history, to education, to even science and epistemology).

It reminds me of something Thunderf00t said in a video, that perhaps the only real contribution to society [of religion] was the feel good factor it provided for people who would rather be happy than right. Armed on the one hand with a heady brew of wishful thinking, and on the other hand with a corporate edifice, both commercial and ecclesiastical, willing to cater to their desire not to know unpleasant things, an entire generation has stepped off the path of what's good and what's true into the epistemic briar patch of "whatever I want to believe because I want it."

(And there's Seth, right on cue.)

As if the Marxist socialist dupes don't do exactly the same thing. Please...

Marxism, and it's intermediate stage, Socialism, and it's end stage Utopia Communism, are all religions with fervent religious believers, dogmas, doctrines, hierarchies and everything else a religion needs, quite literally. The one thing it's not is a "theistic" religion, but then again religion does not require a deity to be religion.

[Tero]

People like dogmas. Easy to learn.

[pErvinalia]

I love how the Marxism meme hasn't died down in conservative circles. Fucking idiots.

[Seth]

I love how the Marxism meme hasn't died down in conservative circles. Fucking idiots.

It's typical of Marxist propagandists to ridicule and deny any Marxist influence in politics or society because that's how Marxists work. They know they cannot defend Marxism or its spawn, Socialism, and it's part of the Marxist Dialectic that good Marxists NEVER EVER actually discuss the merits and demerits of Marxism and its spawn, because it's an indefensible, inherently evil system.

So instead, diversionary tactics such as we see above, and elsewhere from rEv, and various forms of personal attack, ridicule and derision are used to deflect any close examination of the Marxist system itself. Marxists have been well trained not to debate Marxism but to demonize and propagandize instead.

As we see here...