"Obama is harboring an anti-colonial resentment that drives his anti-capitalist policies" is perfectly analogous to "evolutionists just don't want to answer to God".Coito ergo sum wrote:False analogy. Forbes is not to news as Answers in Genesis is to science.
Your view of it, then, is that if it's not spoken or written by a liberal democrat, it's like Answers in Genesis.
It is what it is...a conservative magazine owned, run, and edited by a conservative Republican who allows laughable hackery to grace its cover.
You're not making any sense, and once again you don't bother to read what people write. I'll say it again (with a bit more emphasis on the key points that seem to be beyond your abilities)...Nine economies in Europe are contracting and their debt crisis may pull others along with them.You'll need to connect this up -- you think that the economies of tiny blips like Spain, Portugal, Greece, Italy, etc. control the US economy so much that the Presidential Administration has nothing to do with the economic indicators pointing to a possible recession? NOTHING - to do with it?
China's growth continues to slow as well.
If the EU goes into another recession (or worse) and China's growth continues to shrink (or worse), that would have negative effects on the US economy, including increasing the possibility of our going into another recession. Duh. Does the POTUS have very much control over the EU and China?
Oh FFS. You need to stop being so desperate to try and score debate points that it makes you erect such stupid straw men.You're really trying to suggest that there ARE economic indicators that the Obama Administration does have something to do with, but these aren't any of the economic indicators that point to a recession in 203? Obama only has something to do with those economic indicators that don't point to a recession?