Nationalism. Is there an up side?

Post Reply
User avatar
Jason
Destroyer of words
Posts: 17782
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:46 pm
Contact:

Re: Nationalism. Is there an up side?

Post by Jason » Fri Nov 09, 2012 6:18 pm

Care for some vindaloo?

ronmcd
Posts: 603
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 4:13 pm
Location: Sunny Scotland
Contact:

Re: Nationalism. Is there an up side?

Post by ronmcd » Fri Nov 09, 2012 6:25 pm

PordFrefect wrote:Care for some vindaloo?
Smoked kipper?

User avatar
Jason
Destroyer of words
Posts: 17782
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:46 pm
Contact:

Re: Nationalism. Is there an up side?

Post by Jason » Fri Nov 09, 2012 6:30 pm

Only if it's curried.

PsychoSerenity
"I" Self-Perceive Recursively
Posts: 7824
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:57 am
Contact:

Re: Nationalism. Is there an up side?

Post by PsychoSerenity » Fri Nov 09, 2012 7:04 pm

Hermit wrote:
RiverF wrote:Nationalism =/= diversity.
...and conversely, world government =/= homogeneity.
Agreed on both points.

Though the word "government " has rather a lot of negative connotations for me. I'd go for "understanding and cooperation".
[Disclaimer - if this is comes across like I think I know what I'm talking about, I want to make it clear that I don't. I'm just trying to get my thoughts down]

Elderito
Posts: 23
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 3:55 am
Contact:

Re: Nationalism. Is there an up side?

Post by Elderito » Fri Nov 09, 2012 7:07 pm

Here in the USA nationalism is definitely a stumbling block. Demagogues are able to blind citizens to the problems in our society by chanting "We're number one" constantly.
Health Care reform?? No we have best system in the world 'cause "we're number one"
USA a world citizen?? Hell no !! If they cross us bomb 'em they should know "We're number one"
Global Warming?? Couldn't be us "We're number one!!"
That type of thinking makes it impossible for many Americans to consider solutions found abroad, makes us insular, and keeps us from considering alternative solutions to our problems.

User avatar
Pappa
Non-Practicing Anarchist
Non-Practicing Anarchist
Posts: 56488
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:42 am
About me: I am sacrificing a turnip as I type.
Location: Le sud du Pays de Galles.
Contact:

Re: Nationalism. Is there an up side?

Post by Pappa » Fri Nov 09, 2012 9:29 pm

Red Celt wrote:
Rum wrote:When I was a kid I read loads of science fiction. I was an idealist too and I figured that one day we would have some kind of world government that was wise, beneficent and liberal.

All silly of course given the state of things these days.

Is nationalism defensible these days when all it appears to offer is difference rather than commonality, splitting rather than uniting, excluding rather than including?

Should we not be breaking down barriers rather than creating them?
You're a Little Englander. You are a part of what you hate. Stir your mug of Horlicks with that idea as you go to bed, tonight.

As an example, Scottish independence is being sought after because Westminster has been doing a shit job of it for too many years. If it had been doing a great job, independence would be a non-starter from the outset. This isn't about nationalism (and you've been told that more than once, you fuckwit) but self-determination... because distant-determination doesn't work.

One world government? Great. So long as it has subdivisions that do their best for their own people. Hell, let's go all out and call them... oh, I dunno... "countries".

Alles klar?

With you? Probably not.
Red Celt, this is a reminder that personal attacks are against the rules.
For information on ways to help support Rationalia financially, see our funding page.


When the aliens do come, everything we once thought was cool will then make us ashamed.

User avatar
Red Celt
Humanist Misanthrope
Posts: 1349
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2012 8:30 pm
About me: Crow Philosopher
Location: Fife, Scotland
Contact:

Re: Nationalism. Is there an up side?

Post by Red Celt » Sat Nov 10, 2012 12:16 am

Oh Jesus Fucking Christ.
Image

User avatar
Jason
Destroyer of words
Posts: 17782
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:46 pm
Contact:

Re: Nationalism. Is there an up side?

Post by Jason » Sat Nov 10, 2012 12:39 am

Red Celt wrote:Oh Jesus Fucking Christ.

Red Celt, this is a reminder that blasphemy is punishable by Lozzer.


Oh Jesus Christ!

User avatar
Gallstones
Supreme Absolute And Exclusive Ruler Of The World
Posts: 8888
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:56 am
About me: A fleck on a flake on a speck.

Re: Nationalism. Is there an up side?

Post by Gallstones » Sat Nov 10, 2012 4:00 am

Is this about nationalism or patriotism?
But here’s the thing about rights. They’re not actually supposed to be voted on. That’s why they’re called rights. ~Rachel Maddow August 2010

The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74298
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Nationalism. Is there an up side?

Post by JimC » Sat Nov 10, 2012 6:42 am

Are you Scots still bleeding for Wallace?
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

ronmcd
Posts: 603
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 4:13 pm
Location: Sunny Scotland
Contact:

Re: Nationalism. Is there an up side?

Post by ronmcd » Sat Nov 10, 2012 9:30 am

JimC wrote:Are you Scots still bleeding for Wallace?
Image
Nah, not really. He's not all that great :coffee:

User avatar
Gallstones
Supreme Absolute And Exclusive Ruler Of The World
Posts: 8888
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:56 am
About me: A fleck on a flake on a speck.

Re: Nationalism. Is there an up side?

Post by Gallstones » Sat Nov 10, 2012 5:36 pm

Without differences there could be no progress. Change is necessary for progress and that means thinking and doing differently. Differences inspire ideas, sameness does not. Sameness is status quo.
But here’s the thing about rights. They’re not actually supposed to be voted on. That’s why they’re called rights. ~Rachel Maddow August 2010

The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter

User avatar
That Alien Guy.
Posts: 78
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 10:44 pm
About me: Stuck here for another 18.35 rotations.
Contact:

Re: Nationalism. Is there an up side?

Post by That Alien Guy. » Sat Nov 10, 2012 6:21 pm

Yes. Fight and struggle! We're mid-season at the moment and the advertisers are a bit aggressive, they are asking us to provoke a genocide in Syria, I've tried to assure them that they'll get that even if the other chimp tribes don't intervene.

Work with me here chimps, your survival depends on your ratings.

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74298
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Nationalism. Is there an up side?

Post by JimC » Sun Nov 11, 2012 5:16 am

Gallstones wrote:Without differences there could be no progress. Change is necessary for progress and that means thinking and doing differently. Differences inspire ideas, sameness does not. Sameness is status quo.
One can agree with that, while still worrying about the hominid tendency to fear/hate those that are different to one's tribe...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
Hermit
Posts: 25806
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
About me: Cantankerous grump
Location: Ignore lithpt
Contact:

Re: Nationalism. Is there an up side?

Post by Hermit » Sun Nov 11, 2012 8:54 am

Gallstones wrote:Without differences there could be no progress.
Yes. That's why we would never have found out that the earth is not flat, were it not for nationalism. Or women getting the vote.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests