Guns used for lawful self defense

Locked
User avatar
Blind groper
Posts: 3997
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 3:10 am
About me: From New Zealand
Contact:

Re: Guns used for lawful self defense

Post by Blind groper » Fri Nov 02, 2012 9:36 pm

Seth wrote:
The simple fact that both Chicago and NYC have had, effectively, complete bans on private ownership of handguns, even in the home, and they are at the top of the list for domestic murders, including murders with "illegal" handguns
Again, bullshit.

As I have said, several times, comparing states, or counties is ridiculous. Any one who wants a hand gun, and finds their state prohibits it, can just cross a state line. it needs a total federal ban to be effective, and even then, it will take time.

At the end of the day, the USA still has four times as many murders per capita as other western civilised nations (except Finland, where it is merely double) and half of all murders are done with hand guns.
For every human action, there is a rationalisation and a reason. Only sometimes do they coincide.

User avatar
Jason
Destroyer of words
Posts: 17782
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:46 pm
Contact:

Re: Guns used for lawful self defense

Post by Jason » Fri Nov 02, 2012 9:39 pm

This thread is only fit for the LuLz.

User avatar
Blind groper
Posts: 3997
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 3:10 am
About me: From New Zealand
Contact:

Re: Guns used for lawful self defense

Post by Blind groper » Fri Nov 02, 2012 9:39 pm

Seth wrote:If the government bans handguns, I'm going into the business of manufacturing high-quality "illegal" handguns for the "criminal element" that will readily buy them outside the "legal" market for firearms,
And you claim you are not a psychopath.

The main characteristic of a psychopath is a lack of feeling for other humans, and the willingness to do anything, no matter how much it harms others, if it enriches yourself. Your statement above is absolute classic psychopath.

It has been estimated that 3% of the population are psychopaths. That means roughly 1 in 30. Since there are more than 30 contributors to Rationalia, there is very likely one or more psychopaths among the membership. Is Seth one of them?
For every human action, there is a rationalisation and a reason. Only sometimes do they coincide.

User avatar
Jason
Destroyer of words
Posts: 17782
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:46 pm
Contact:

Re: Guns used for lawful self defense

Post by Jason » Fri Nov 02, 2012 9:54 pm

Blind groper wrote:
Seth wrote:If the government bans handguns, I'm going into the business of manufacturing high-quality "illegal" handguns for the "criminal element" that will readily buy them outside the "legal" market for firearms,
And you claim you are not a psychopath.

The main characteristic of a psychopath is a lack of feeling for other humans, and the willingness to do anything, no matter how much it harms others, if it enriches yourself. Your statement above is absolute classic psychopath.

It has been estimated that 3% of the population are psychopaths. That means roughly 1 in 30. Since there are more than 30 contributors to Rationalia, there is very likely one or more psychopaths among the membership. Is Seth one of them?
I think the word you're looking for is sociopath as he'd be operating against legitimate society.

Your last paragraph employs a very familiar argument.. I think I saw something like that about rapists on A+.

MrJonno
Posts: 3442
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 7:24 am
Contact:

Re: Guns used for lawful self defense

Post by MrJonno » Fri Nov 02, 2012 10:45 pm

I think the being prepared to kill without hesitation to defend yourself may be resasonable useful in a war zone (throught most military actions are just highly armed policing these days) taking that attitude in civilian life makes you anyone a complete nut job and highly dangerous to anyone
When only criminals carry guns the police know exactly who to shoot!

User avatar
Blind groper
Posts: 3997
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 3:10 am
About me: From New Zealand
Contact:

Re: Guns used for lawful self defense

Post by Blind groper » Fri Nov 02, 2012 10:51 pm

PordFrefect wrote: I think the word you're looking for is sociopath.
The difference is somewhat moot. I have seen the two described by several authors as being synonyms, and by other authors as being distinct. I tend to operate on the assumption they are the same.

There is a myth that many people share about psychopaths (sociopaths), that they are violent and will kill people. While that is, no doubt, true in a small minority of cases, most such people are careful not to practice violence. The thing is that a psychopath will do absolutely anything without conscience, if, and only if, he can get away with it. So the laws of society, and the punishments meted out to criminals, are sufficient to keep most of them from violence.

However, there are lots of ways a person with no conscience can prosper as a result of that ruthlessness, without actually breaking the law and ending up in prison. Many top business-people are, in fact, psychopaths. Their total ruthlessness permits them to do unethical things that bring material wealth, while hurting others.
For every human action, there is a rationalisation and a reason. Only sometimes do they coincide.

User avatar
Gallstones
Supreme Absolute And Exclusive Ruler Of The World
Posts: 8888
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:56 am
About me: A fleck on a flake on a speck.

Re: Guns used for lawful self defense

Post by Gallstones » Fri Nov 02, 2012 11:07 pm

Weapons that don't go boom.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eyoLpz5I ... kCS0Tabs3Q[/youtube]


I have a bunch of paracord.
All I need is a steel ball.
But here’s the thing about rights. They’re not actually supposed to be voted on. That’s why they’re called rights. ~Rachel Maddow August 2010

The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41179
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: Guns used for lawful self defense

Post by Svartalf » Fri Nov 02, 2012 11:42 pm

Blind groper wrote:
Seth wrote:
This is quite obviously not true. It's as easy for a criminal to get a handgun in Europe as it is anywhere because those who walk in criminal circles don't give a damn about the law..
Bullshit.

It is not about giving a damn about the law. it is about making it hard to get hold of such weapons, and having a police force that arrests anyone who has possession.

The truth of that is shown by the very small number of hand guns, even in criminal hands, in western civilised nations outside the USA.
I don't know where our criminals get their guns (I suspect Eastern Europe given the amount of Kalashs reported), but guns they have, and .45 ACP is reported as a "common caliber", nobbody in Europe ever used it for service weapons...
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

Seth
GrandMaster Zen Troll
Posts: 22077
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:02 am
Contact:

Re: Guns used for lawful self defense

Post by Seth » Sat Nov 03, 2012 1:07 am

Blind groper wrote:
Seth wrote:If the government bans handguns, I'm going into the business of manufacturing high-quality "illegal" handguns for the "criminal element" that will readily buy them outside the "legal" market for firearms,
And you claim you are not a psychopath.
Yup. I'm a patriot and defender of the Constitution. Since the Constitution forbids my government from banning firearms, any attempt to do so is an act of lawless tyranny which may be justifiably met with force if the government refuses to come to heel.
The main characteristic of a psychopath is a lack of feeling for other humans, and the willingness to do anything, no matter how much it harms others, if it enriches yourself. Your statement above is absolute classic psychopath.
You don't understand, I would build guns BECAUSE I have empathy and concern for others. I understand history, as you do not, which amply demonstrates time and time again over the course of thousands of years that the very first thing that a despotic tyrant does is to disarm the public, most often using lame excuses of "public safety" to convince the credulous masses to give up their arms, and using brutal force to strip them of their arms if they cannot cozen them into handing them over. What inevitably follows is oppression, murder, genocide and all manner of despotic malfeasance because the people have no way to resist the onslaught of tyranny. The only recourse the people have when a tyrant takes power is force of arms and to free themselves from despotism they must have adequate arms to achieve their liberty and freedom. I'm not even going to bother to list the litany of societies that have been subjugated and enslaved, sometimes for hundreds or thousands of years because they are unarmed and unable to rise up and overthrow a tyrant. One example will do: Rome.

So, you see, I have great empathy and concern for my fellow human beings and I know that by providing them with arms when they are under the boot-heel of a tyrant they will have the capacity to win their freedom. Interestingly, it is the policy of the United States to arm rebel forces fighting against tyrants and despots and regimes that are hostile to the universal rights of human beings, which makes any attempt at domestic gun bans hypocrisy of the highest order. It was, after all, France that came to our aid in our rebellion against Mad King George and his Redcoats by supplying us with arms, power, shot and other supplies. We won our independence because both King George and the French knew that arms in the hands of the people is the surest barrier against tyranny, and our Revolution succeeded, where rebellions in other English vassal states usually failed, because our arms were the equal of our enemies.

You have it exactly backwards. Disarming the citizenry is not an act of empathy, it is a hostile act of selfishness and arrogance intended to pander to your own paranoid fears and desire for the illusion of safety at the expense of everyone who will inevitably be victimized, injured and killed by criminals and tyrants. It is you who is demonstrating psychopathy. It is you who is disregarding the supreme and preeminent right of each and every individual human being on the face of the planet to be adequately armed at all times so that they can effectively defend themselves, their families, their communities and their nations against both criminal victimization of all types, and against tyrannical despotism from their leaders. Only a psychopath would deny a victim the arms required to successfully defend himself on the fallacious premise that 300 million people must be disarmed and victimized to serve your paranoid fears and the "needs" of a tiny fraction of a percent of citizens who, unfortunately, misuse or abuse their rights.

In no other sphere would your argument even make sense. The number of people killed in auto accidents is many times that of handgun homicides, and yet we hear no argument from you that cars should be banned, do we? Nope. The number of children killed by bathtubs, swimming pools and five gallon buckets is much higher than those accidentally killed by firearms, and yet you do not advocate for banning any of those objects.

Don't bother with your usual canard of "but guns are different than swimming pools or cars, they are designed to kill and there is utility in cars and swimming pools." Wrong. Guns, all guns, are designed to expel a projectile in a specified direction at high velocity on command and nothing more, just as swimming pools are designed for water recreation, not as child drowning machines.

Because you studiously ignore the huge number of incidents in which a firearm, possessed and used lawfully, PREVENTS criminal victimization and preserve lives, your arguments are just so much propagandistic bilge, and you know it, which is why you refuse to even address the subject of this thread and instead continue to derail the topic with your tired old hoplophobic canards that have been disproven and debunked so often that it's no longer necessary to do more than laugh at your pathetic attempts to formulate a cogent argument.
It has been estimated that 3% of the population are psychopaths. That means roughly 1 in 30. Since there are more than 30 contributors to Rationalia, there is very likely one or more psychopaths among the membership. Is Seth one of them?
Nope. As we can see, it's you who is manifesting narcissistic tendencies and paranoid pathological behavior. You're afraid of guns, so you want everyone else to kowtow to you and your silly arguments to assuage your fear. Not gonna happen. Sleep tight.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S

"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth

© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.

Seth
GrandMaster Zen Troll
Posts: 22077
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:02 am
Contact:

Re: Guns used for lawful self defense

Post by Seth » Sat Nov 03, 2012 1:12 am

MrJonno wrote:I think the being prepared to kill without hesitation to defend yourself may be resasonable useful in a war zone (throught most military actions are just highly armed policing these days) taking that attitude in civilian life makes you anyone a complete nut job and highly dangerous to anyone
You would, but then again your arguments are the hallmark of a paranoid nutcase from the get-go, so your opinion is something less than credible, and has been conclusively disproven by the America CCW experiment.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S

"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth

© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.

Seth
GrandMaster Zen Troll
Posts: 22077
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:02 am
Contact:

Re: Guns used for lawful self defense

Post by Seth » Sat Nov 03, 2012 1:18 am

PordFrefect wrote:
Blind groper wrote:
Seth wrote:If the government bans handguns, I'm going into the business of manufacturing high-quality "illegal" handguns for the "criminal element" that will readily buy them outside the "legal" market for firearms,
And you claim you are not a psychopath.

The main characteristic of a psychopath is a lack of feeling for other humans, and the willingness to do anything, no matter how much it harms others, if it enriches yourself. Your statement above is absolute classic psychopath.

It has been estimated that 3% of the population are psychopaths. That means roughly 1 in 30. Since there are more than 30 contributors to Rationalia, there is very likely one or more psychopaths among the membership. Is Seth one of them?
I think the word you're looking for is sociopath as he'd be operating against legitimate society.
Wrong Pord. No society which presumes to disarm it's members is "legitimate" in any sense of the word and may be justifiably destroyed in order to protect the natural and universal human right to keep and bear arms for self defense and defense of the nation. And particularly here in the U.S., attempts to disarm the citizenry are a direct, blatant violation of the 2nd Amendment of the Constitution and such acts justify the use of physical force, up to and including deadly physical force to remove the threat to our rights and eliminate those who have the temerity to attempt such a thing. Resistance against gun bans is not even civil disobedience, it's appropriate and lawful civil action in defense of the Constitution and the nation, and is a restorative act of supreme justice executed by those who are imperiled by the despotic and tyrannous actions of illegitimate authority.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S

"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth

© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.

User avatar
Jason
Destroyer of words
Posts: 17782
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:46 pm
Contact:

Re: Guns used for lawful self defense

Post by Jason » Sat Nov 03, 2012 1:23 am

If they amend the amendment and make it the law that no citizen shall be armed, then the legitimate (in the sense of lawful) society is those citizens who obey the law and disarm. So you would be a sociopath in that you are working against legitimate society by manufacturing and distributing firearms within that society.

It's a fine point and not particularly important.. so meh. That's all I'm going to say about it.

User avatar
Blind groper
Posts: 3997
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 3:10 am
About me: From New Zealand
Contact:

Re: Guns used for lawful self defense

Post by Blind groper » Sat Nov 03, 2012 2:01 am

To Seth



Disarming does not create tyrannies. Take my country. It has been declared, by international survey, the most peaceful and the least corrupt (and one of the least religious) nations on Earth. And no-one thinks of firearms as a means of controlling the government. This idea of citizens needing arms to keep the government from becoming a tyranny is not a result of history. It is a result of paranoia and propaganda from the NRA and other groups with their own agendas.

Also, the French aided the USA in your War of Independence because it suited them to do so, in that they were hostile to Britain, and the war of independence drew British forces away. Their motives had nothing to do with fellow feeling, and everything to do with expedience. Several nations hostile to Britain helped the rebels, and without them, the war would have been lost real quick.

Nor have I ever said we should disarm the citizenry. That is your twist on what I said. I have noted the disproportionate nature of hand guns in murders and suicides, and said hand guns are the problem and hand guns should be removed. I have said consistently that any firearm with a legitimate (not killing people) use should be permitted. Hand guns in fighting a government are pretty nearly useless anyway.

Hand guns do not save lives. That is shown very conclusively by the enormous toll on life hand guns take in the USA, where there are lots of hand guns, and the lack of such toll in other western civilised nations, where hand guns are few. Hand guns kill people. More hand guns kill more people, not fewer. Your thesis is utterly ridiculous.

The killing situation in the USA is so bad that, during the Viet Nam war, when over 50,000 Americans were killed, murders with hand guns back in the States were killing two people for every one killed in Viet Nam. Wanting to keep hand guns widespread is insanity.
For every human action, there is a rationalisation and a reason. Only sometimes do they coincide.

User avatar
macdoc
Twitcher
Posts: 9212
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:20 pm
Location: BirdWing Home FNQ
Contact:

Re: Guns used for lawful self defense

Post by macdoc » Sat Nov 03, 2012 2:13 am

ahem

http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/crime/a ... ibly-wrong

collateral damage seems fine in Seth's warped universe..... :nono:

He and Romney certainly are soul mates with bayonets and horses.....so what's another kid or two :coffee:

Here Seth - look him in the eye....

Image
Resident in Cairns Australia • Current ride> 2014 Honda CB500F • Travel photos https://500px.com/p/macdoc?view=galleries

User avatar
macdoc
Twitcher
Posts: 9212
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:20 pm
Location: BirdWing Home FNQ
Contact:

Re: Guns used for lawful self defense

Post by macdoc » Sat Nov 03, 2012 5:59 am

Resident in Cairns Australia • Current ride> 2014 Honda CB500F • Travel photos https://500px.com/p/macdoc?view=galleries

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests