Aha! I think I see the problem. This is the EU you're dealing with. Common sense is not to be taken for granted. I'm Irish, and "negotiating" with the EU is only for those with inordinate patience, especially if you are from a small country with about 1% of the current EU population*. Salmond wants to get everything done and dusted with a year to spare. I think that's just a pipe-dream. Nothing ever goes smoothly with the EU, especially where there are power politics and money involved. I'd prefer if it were different, for the Scots as much as us Irish.ronmcd wrote: ...
So I think we all agree Scotland would be in EU, the question is immediately, or after a short negotiation, or after a long brutal series of arguments? I think sense will prevail and it will be pretty simple and seamless.
An independent Scotland?
- klr
- (%gibber(who=klr, what=Leprageek);)
- Posts: 32964
- Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 1:25 pm
- About me: The money was just resting in my account.
- Location: Airstrip Two
- Contact:
Re: An independent Scotland?
God has no place within these walls, just like facts have no place within organized religion. - Superintendent Chalmers
It's not up to us to choose which laws we want to obey. If it were, I'd kill everyone who looked at me cock-eyed! - Rex Banner
The Bluebird of Happiness long absent from his life, Ned is visited by the Chicken of Depression. - Gary Larson

It's not up to us to choose which laws we want to obey. If it were, I'd kill everyone who looked at me cock-eyed! - Rex Banner
The Bluebird of Happiness long absent from his life, Ned is visited by the Chicken of Depression. - Gary Larson



Re: An independent Scotland?
Alright. Who pissed in Red Celt's haggis? (or didn't piss.. I forget how to make haggis). 

- Bella Fortuna
- Sister Golden Hair
- Posts: 79685
- Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:45 am
- About me: Being your slave, what should I do but tend
Upon the hours and times of your desire?
I have no precious time at all to spend,
Nor services to do, till you require. - Location: Scotlifornia
- Contact:
Re: An independent Scotland?
I will do so, in fairness.Red Celt wrote:Now imagine someone who is vocally and actively anti-blonde. Now imagine that a friend of that anti-blonde (who hasn't criticised any of his friend's anti-blonde comments) resorts to anti-blonde stereotypes. Would you see the usage of that stereotype as harmless as other stereotypes? Or might you think it reasonable to assume that there is deeper substance to that particular person resorting to stereotypes?Bella Fortuna wrote:Remind me to pitch a fit next time someone makes a crack about blondes being stupid
Read the whole thread, Bella. Then tell me your thoughts on some of the people who have been "contributing" here, and why their "contributions" have resulted in "snark".
Sent from my Bollocksberry using Crapatalk.
Food, cooking, and disreputable nonsense: http://miscreantsdiner.blogspot.com/
- Audley Strange
- "I blame the victim"
- Posts: 7485
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 5:00 pm
- Contact:
Re: An independent Scotland?
Schneibster?
First LIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!
First LIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!
"What started as a legitimate effort by the townspeople of Salem to identify, capture and kill those who did Satan's bidding quickly deteriorated into a witch hunt" Army Man
- Red Celt
- Humanist Misanthrope
- Posts: 1349
- Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2012 8:30 pm
- About me: Crow Philosopher
- Location: Fife, Scotland
- Contact:
Re: An independent Scotland?
I've always stood up to bigots and bullies. If you'd sooner roll up into a ball and let them kick you, be my guest.PordFrefect wrote:Alright. Who pissed in Red Celt's haggis? (or didn't piss.. I forget how to make haggis).
Meanwhile I'll give as good as I get... and then some.

Re: An independent Scotland?
I've never seen anything about it either. But Scotland would be becoming an independent nation, like all the others in Europe. I see no possibility Scotland would have any desire to claim overseas territories, or any claim on them. Just as Scotland wouldnt be claiming 8 or 9% of Wales or England territory. The two parts would each retain per capita (or GDP) shares of assets and debts, as you suggest. 100% of territory and resources attributable to that territory. So any new oil and gas reserves around the Falklands? Not Scotlands business. Shale gas reserves in England? Not Scotlands business.Clinton Huxley wrote:Here's a question for Ronmcd, as I don't think I've seen anything about it. I think I know what the answer is, though. A separatist Scotland would inherit its per capita share of the armed forces, national debt etc etc. Would it relinquish any territorial claim to the remaining UK overseas territories, or would it want 8% of the Pitcairn Islands?
"Separatist" is of course a pejorative term for independence. Is UK a separatist state? When is US "Separation Day"?

- Tyrannical
- Posts: 6468
- Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:59 am
- Contact:
Re: An independent Scotland?
Perfectly fair for the SNP to want the UK to divest itself from at least some non-British isle territories. You could either grant them full citizenship in a united countries or cut them free if it was mutually agreed. The key movement I think is a diminishing of Federal powers and an increase in local authority. Not so unlike the Ron Paul movement in the US.Clinton Huxley wrote:Here's a question for Ronmcd, as I don't think I've seen anything about it. I think I know what the answer is, though. A separatist Scotland would inherit its per capita share of the armed forces, national debt etc etc. Would it relinquish any territorial claim to the remaining UK overseas territories, or would it want 8% of the Pitcairn Islands?
A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.
Re: An independent Scotland?
You might well be right, it might take some time. Whats ironic is it's conservative voting England which would be most leaning towards leaving EU. But hey ho, I see no reason why potential difficulties should stop us doing something, something that presumably would be worth doing in the long term if we were going to bother doing it at all.klr wrote:Aha! I think I see the problem. This is the EU you're dealing with. Common sense is not to be taken for granted. I'm Irish, and "negotiating" with the EU is only for those with inordinate patience, especially if you are from a small country with about 1% of the current EU population*. Salmond wants to get everything done and dusted with a year to spare. I think that's just a pipe-dream. Nothing ever goes smoothly with the EU, especially where there are power politics and money involved. I'd prefer if it were different, for the Scots as much as us Irish.ronmcd wrote: ...
So I think we all agree Scotland would be in EU, the question is immediately, or after a short negotiation, or after a long brutal series of arguments? I think sense will prevail and it will be pretty simple and seamless.
- Svartalf
- Offensive Grail Keeper
- Posts: 41185
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: Paris France
- Contact:
Re: An independent Scotland?
Not being a resident, I'm not directly concerned, but as a Stuart descendent, I'd be shocked if my countrymen kept those usurpers.Red Celt wrote:It doesn't really matter what anyone thinks about that. The monarchy is not a part of the independence debate.Svartalf wrote:YOu wouldn't secede from UK and keep that harridan, latest of a long line of Hunnish usurpers for a head of state, would you?Red Celt wrote:Scotland already has a monarch... and her mother was a Scot.Tyrannical wrote:So, who gets to be King of Scotland? Who would be Mary's closest Scottish relative? I bet the Pope could crown him while sitting above the coronation stone.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
- Tyrannical
- Posts: 6468
- Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:59 am
- Contact:
Re: An independent Scotland?
As a Stuart decedent you are directly concerned. Blood is thicker than the English channel that separates you.
A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.
- klr
- (%gibber(who=klr, what=Leprageek);)
- Posts: 32964
- Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 1:25 pm
- About me: The money was just resting in my account.
- Location: Airstrip Two
- Contact:
Re: An independent Scotland?
I think I've alluded to this as well before. The anti-EU elements in England would use this to their own advantage. I suspect this makes those nearer the "centre" of English politics all the more concerned about a "Yes" vote. As you say, their problems are not your problems ... unless they react in such a way as to become your problem in some way or other. Life is rarely simple ...ronmcd wrote:You might well be right, it might take some time. Whats ironic is it's conservative voting England which would be most leaning towards leaving EU. But hey ho, I see no reason why potential difficulties should stop us doing something, something that presumably would be worth doing in the long term if we were going to bother doing it at all.klr wrote:Aha! I think I see the problem. This is the EU you're dealing with. Common sense is not to be taken for granted. I'm Irish, and "negotiating" with the EU is only for those with inordinate patience, especially if you are from a small country with about 1% of the current EU population*. Salmond wants to get everything done and dusted with a year to spare. I think that's just a pipe-dream. Nothing ever goes smoothly with the EU, especially where there are power politics and money involved. I'd prefer if it were different, for the Scots as much as us Irish.ronmcd wrote: ...
So I think we all agree Scotland would be in EU, the question is immediately, or after a short negotiation, or after a long brutal series of arguments? I think sense will prevail and it will be pretty simple and seamless.
God has no place within these walls, just like facts have no place within organized religion. - Superintendent Chalmers
It's not up to us to choose which laws we want to obey. If it were, I'd kill everyone who looked at me cock-eyed! - Rex Banner
The Bluebird of Happiness long absent from his life, Ned is visited by the Chicken of Depression. - Gary Larson

It's not up to us to choose which laws we want to obey. If it were, I'd kill everyone who looked at me cock-eyed! - Rex Banner
The Bluebird of Happiness long absent from his life, Ned is visited by the Chicken of Depression. - Gary Larson



- Svartalf
- Offensive Grail Keeper
- Posts: 41185
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: Paris France
- Contact:
Re: An independent Scotland?
Given what comes out of Westminster and 10 Downing, anywhere with London in it has to be the rumpClinton Huxley wrote:I prefer the term "majority UK" to "Rump UK".

Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
- Clinton Huxley
- 19th century monkeybitch.
- Posts: 23746
- Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:34 pm
- Contact:
Re: An independent Scotland?
Now, now, London is France's fourth largest city...Svartalf wrote:Given what comes out of Westminster and 10 Downing, anywhere with London in it has to be the rumpClinton Huxley wrote:I prefer the term "majority UK" to "Rump UK".
"I grow old … I grow old …
I shall wear the bottoms of my trousers rolled"
AND MERRY XMAS TO ONE AND All!
http://25kv.co.uk/date_counter.php?date ... 20counting!!![/img-sig]
I shall wear the bottoms of my trousers rolled"
AND MERRY XMAS TO ONE AND All!
Re: An independent Scotland?
As a Plantagenet I'm inclined to invade those rebellious Scots, violently oppress them, and claim 'first rights' on all their women. As a Lindsay, however, I'm inclined to remove my pants and underwear, gird my kilt about my loins, and get piss drunk.Svartalf wrote:Not being a resident, I'm not directly concerned, but as a Stuart descendent, I'd be shocked if my countrymen kept those usurpers.Red Celt wrote:It doesn't really matter what anyone thinks about that. The monarchy is not a part of the independence debate.Svartalf wrote:YOu wouldn't secede from UK and keep that harridan, latest of a long line of Hunnish usurpers for a head of state, would you?Red Celt wrote:Scotland already has a monarch... and her mother was a Scot.Tyrannical wrote:So, who gets to be King of Scotland? Who would be Mary's closest Scottish relative? I bet the Pope could crown him while sitting above the coronation stone.
I'm a house divided.
- Tyrannical
- Posts: 6468
- Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:59 am
- Contact:
Re: An independent Scotland?
Wow, "first rights" is a term I haven't heard in a while. I wont diverge this thread so I wont share my views on it and evolutionary theory here. But you can literary be the seed of your own destruction.
Last edited by Tyrannical on Thu Oct 25, 2012 4:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 29 guests