
Seriously: Everyone ought to take a deep breath and count slowly to 62 million, which is probably the approximate number of seconds to the referendum. Plenty of time ...
There we go...Red Celt wrote:You should provide yourself as a feature for the "Yes" campaign.
Actually that was pretty damned funny..Clinton Huxley wrote:you are sillier than I had given you credit for.Red Celt wrote:Said the sad Little Englander, still upset about the loss of bygone days, when he could go around the world teaching brown people how to play cricket before killing them...Clinton Huxley wrote:Here we see the violence inherent in the Scotchman.
To hell with that. Just declare war and be done with it. I'll get my kilt on.klr wrote:Ah, this is almost like the old days at RDF.![]()
Seriously: Everyone ought to take a deep breath and count slowly to 62 million, which is probably the approximate number of seconds to the referendum. Plenty of time ...
You shouldn't doctor someone else's photo that they freely posted, certainly not to attack them.Red Celt wrote:There we go...Red Celt wrote:You should provide yourself as a feature for the "Yes" campaign.
[img]image_deletedg[/img]
Technically libellous and actionable, in my opinion.klr wrote:You shouldn't doctor someone else's photo that they freely posted, certainly not to attack them.Red Celt wrote:There we go...Red Celt wrote:You should provide yourself as a feature for the "Yes" campaign.
[img]image-deleted[/img]
I'm not aggressive. I'm just consistent, both online and offline. As opposed to you, who sit in the sanctity of your internet safety zone throwing insults around... that you wouldn't dare say to someone's face. Because that's just cowardly. See the difference there? Based on everything else you've said, I'm guessing not. Sir Robin.Clinton Huxley wrote:So apart from being aggressive, ignorant and incorrect, you have amateur hour photoshop skills.
Clinton Huxley wrote:For the record, I'm not anti-scot
I didn't doctor it. I cropped it and changed it to blue. The original ugliness was all Mother Nature, not me.klr wrote:You shouldn't doctor someone else's photo that they freely posted, certainly not to attack them.
Absolutely.Red Celt wrote:I didn't doctor it. I cropped it and changed it to blue. The original ugliness was all Mother Nature, not me.klr wrote:You shouldn't doctor someone else's photo that they freely posted, certainly not to attack them.
Is adding text "doctoring"? Because now you're really having to stretch the definition of the word.
Clinton Huxley wrote:Haha, wow already we can see the level of debate we can look forward to in an independent Scotland. Putting you on ignore, Red Celt. You aren't worth my time.
klr wrote:Absolutely.Red Celt wrote:I didn't doctor it. I cropped it and changed it to blue. The original ugliness was all Mother Nature, not me.klr wrote:You shouldn't doctor someone else's photo that they freely posted, certainly not to attack them.
Is adding text "doctoring"? Because now you're really having to stretch the definition of the word.
Doctored:-PordFrefect wrote:
PordFrefect wrote:Yeah, right...
...that's really "doctored" isn't it?![]()
You can call it anything you like - a rose by any other name and all that. It should be quite clear from context what I was referring to.Red Celt wrote:...klr wrote:Absolutely.Red Celt wrote:I didn't doctor it. I cropped it and changed it to blue. The original ugliness was all Mother Nature, not me.klr wrote:You shouldn't doctor someone else's photo that they freely posted, certainly not to attack them.
Is adding text "doctoring"? Because now you're really having to stretch the definition of the word.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests