An independent Scotland?

Post Reply
User avatar
Red Celt
Humanist Misanthrope
Posts: 1349
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2012 8:30 pm
About me: Crow Philosopher
Location: Fife, Scotland
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by Red Celt » Tue Oct 23, 2012 3:06 pm

Clinton Huxley wrote:Ah, assertions.

Turns out there was a god reason Salmond didn't want to release his legal advice re EU membership post independence, he hadn't asked for any. Makes you wonder where else the Scotch Separatists are cutting corners.
It's "Scottish", not "Scotch". Calling Scots "Scotch" stopped pretty much at the same time as black people stopped being called "nig-nogs".

Why do you keep returning to this, like a dog to its vomit?
Image

User avatar
Faithfree
The Potable Atheist
Posts: 16174
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 11:58 am
About me: All things in moderation, including moderation
Location: Planet of the grapes
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by Faithfree » Tue Oct 23, 2012 3:10 pm

On the plus side, if Scotland becomes a seperate country, it will increase the number of countries I can claim to have visited. :coffee:
Although it may look like a forum, this site is actually a crowd-sourced science project modelling the slow but inexorable heat death of the universe.

User avatar
Red Celt
Humanist Misanthrope
Posts: 1349
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2012 8:30 pm
About me: Crow Philosopher
Location: Fife, Scotland
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by Red Celt » Tue Oct 23, 2012 3:13 pm

A little something I made earlier...

Image
Image

User avatar
Jason
Destroyer of words
Posts: 17782
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:46 pm
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by Jason » Tue Oct 23, 2012 3:15 pm

How to say this without insulting.. I've never seen Scotland as a turd smear on a political poster before now. :pardon:

User avatar
Red Celt
Humanist Misanthrope
Posts: 1349
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2012 8:30 pm
About me: Crow Philosopher
Location: Fife, Scotland
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by Red Celt » Tue Oct 23, 2012 3:18 pm

PordFrefect wrote:How to say this without insulting.. I've never seen Scotland as a turd smear on a political poster before now. :pardon:
A turd smear?
Image

User avatar
Jason
Destroyer of words
Posts: 17782
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:46 pm
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by Jason » Tue Oct 23, 2012 3:22 pm

:hehe: Sorry.. I mean the way the overlay is done with the colours blending and all it looks like someone hurled a ball of gunk at a poster.. maybe it would be better if the landmass was in grayscale?

User avatar
Red Celt
Humanist Misanthrope
Posts: 1349
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2012 8:30 pm
About me: Crow Philosopher
Location: Fife, Scotland
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by Red Celt » Tue Oct 23, 2012 3:24 pm

PordFrefect wrote::hehe: Sorry.. I mean the way the overlay is done with the colours blending and all it looks like someone hurled a ball of gunk at a poster.. maybe it would be better if the landmass was in grayscale?
The flag is meant to dominate, not the land mass. I like it the way it is. :tea:
Image

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41185
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by Svartalf » Tue Oct 23, 2012 3:26 pm

Clinton Huxley wrote:Seems Salmonella may have "misspoke" re his legal advice
What's that "legal adivce" I jhear of repeatedly in conjunction with him?
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
Clinton Huxley
19th century monkeybitch.
Posts: 23746
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:34 pm
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by Clinton Huxley » Tue Oct 23, 2012 3:28 pm

Svartalf wrote:
Clinton Huxley wrote:Seems Salmonella may have "misspoke" re his legal advice
What's that "legal adivce" I jhear of repeatedly in conjunction with him?
its the advice he didn't get...
"I grow old … I grow old …
I shall wear the bottoms of my trousers rolled"

AND MERRY XMAS TO ONE AND All!

Imagehttp://25kv.co.uk/date_counter.php?date ... 20counting!!![/img-sig]

ronmcd
Posts: 603
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 4:13 pm
Location: Sunny Scotland
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by ronmcd » Tue Oct 23, 2012 4:41 pm

Clinton Huxley wrote: Turns out there was a god reason Salmond didn't want to release his legal advice re EU membership post independence, he hadn't asked for any. Makes you wonder where else the Scotch Separatists are cutting corners.
Sorry ... you really are utterly utterly ignorant of this whole topic, aren't you? From the bbc:
The SNP revealed it was dropping a court battle to stop publication of whether they had previously sought advice from law officers.
The point about legal advice is that no government ever reveals whether it has sought or received legal advice, or what that is. Until now the SNP govt have refused to reveal IF they have had legal advice.

The EU will likely be ABLE to give some comment now that there is an agreement between the two governments over the referendum, hence the revelation they have not sought advice from the EU. Of course my understanding is this story today is conflating two issues ... first any advice from EU ... second legal advice from law officers within the Scottish govt to the government ministers.

Its interesting to note that Salmond repeatedly said in Parliament that IF he revealed whether they had sought legal advice or what any legal advice contained, it would be contrary to the Ministerial Code. And today's response from Scottish Labour ? Can you guess?
Labour MSP Richard Baker demanded to know how the Deputy First Minister could reveal the "existence or non-existence of legal advice" under the ministerial code, which normally precludes this.
ROFL!

ronmcd
Posts: 603
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 4:13 pm
Location: Sunny Scotland
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by ronmcd » Tue Oct 23, 2012 4:52 pm

From bbc http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-s ... s-20042069:
Ms Sturgeon confirmed the Scottish government has now commissioned specific legal advice from law officers on the position of Scotland within the European Union.

The SNP had not previously done so.

She said: "The Scottish government has previously cited opinions from a number of eminent legal authorities, past and present, in support of its view that an independent Scotland will continue in membership of the European Union - but has not sought specific legal advice.

"However, as the Edinburgh Agreement provides the exact context of the process of obtaining independence, we now have the basis on which specific legal advice can be sought."

Ministers had previously gone to court to prevent attempts to reveal whether or not they had sought such advice.

Ms Sturgeon said the government's position in the independence White Paper would be based on the advice they receive.

ronmcd
Posts: 603
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 4:13 pm
Location: Sunny Scotland
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by ronmcd » Tue Oct 23, 2012 5:02 pm

Lets recap, just for the lols ...

Scottish Labour demand for months that SNP reveal their legal advice.
SNP say it would be against ministerial code, no govt reveals if they have even HAD legal advice, same as UK govt.
Information commissioner says EU legal advice should be revealed, because of importance.
Now that an agreement has been achieved between governments, SNP reveal they can now seek legal advice based on the agreement.
Scottish Labour accuse SNP of lying, saying they said they did have legal advice (eh?), AND attack them for breaking ministerial code (as SNP said)!

Brilliant.

User avatar
Santa_Claus
Your Imaginary Friend
Posts: 1985
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2010 7:06 pm
About me: Ho! Ho! Ho!
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by Santa_Claus » Tue Oct 23, 2012 7:32 pm

Clinton Huxley wrote:Ah, assertions.

Turns out there was a god reason Salmond didn't want to release his legal advice re EU membership post independence, he hadn't asked for any. Makes you wonder where else the Scotch Separatists are cutting corners.
A god reason? :funny:

As I said, get the opposition focusing on the irrelevant - and hey presto a Referendum. on the date wanted.

Until the Referendum got agreed with the English then nothing really that needed legal advise on - 2 years is more than enough time to have initial talks with the EU and get some legal advice.

BTW the legal advice that Salmond gets will say that it is possible for Scotland to be in the EU (no shit - they let anyone in!). Until an actual Yes vote then no point in going to formal talks with the EU about exactly how that is acheived (likely accepted as an existing member, but with a new treaty on top to confirm the details - mostly so the Scots get a nice day out and feel important).

What the English position then is ain't a concern for Salmond (likely that it simply remains in the EU).
I am Leader of all The Atheists in the world - FACT.

Come look inside Santa's Hole :ninja:

You want to hear the truth about Santa Claus???.....you couldn't handle the truth about Santa Claus!!!

User avatar
mistermack
Posts: 15093
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:57 am
About me: Never rong.
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by mistermack » Tue Oct 23, 2012 8:03 pm

I'm sure that there is no legal impediment to Scotland becoming a full member state.

SO LONG AS ALL MEMBERS AGREE.

That's MY legal advice to smart Alex.

Whether the same applies to the reduced UK is a bit less certain.
While there is a market for shit, there will be assholes to supply it.

User avatar
Santa_Claus
Your Imaginary Friend
Posts: 1985
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2010 7:06 pm
About me: Ho! Ho! Ho!
Contact:

Re: An independent Scotland?

Post by Santa_Claus » Wed Oct 24, 2012 12:33 am

mistermack wrote:I'm sure that there is no legal impediment to Scotland becoming a full member state.

SO LONG AS ALL MEMBERS AGREE.

That's MY legal advice to smart Alex.

Whether the same applies to the reduced UK is a bit less certain.
I think by ALL you mean Germany :hehe: .

But that only matters after a YES vote - beforehand there will be enough (including legal advice) to argue that Scotland will be a member of the EU (the serious discussions can only happen after a YES vote).....IMO that is a fairly easy EOTW scare story to dispel simply on the basis that if the EU would let muppet eastern European countries in then no reason why Scotland would not be let in - the last thing that the EU wants is for Scotland to become happy with a Norway style half in / half out arrangement, so ASAP is good for the EU......plus after a YES vote Salmond can make warm noises about the Euro safe in the knowledge that "when the time is right" (and subject to a referendum) won't be happening any time soon.
I am Leader of all The Atheists in the world - FACT.

Come look inside Santa's Hole :ninja:

You want to hear the truth about Santa Claus???.....you couldn't handle the truth about Santa Claus!!!

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests