Corruption in Alberta, Canada, 'Mafia' or someone else...

[BrettA]

Sorry for the confusing post, guys, but it is what it is...

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Brett Aubrey <brett.aubrey@yahoo.ca>
To: "403923xxxx@txt.bell.ca" <403923xxxx@txt.bell.ca>
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 5:31:05 PM

Subject: Fw: Corruption also in Alberta, Canada, whether 'Mafia' or someone else... (BCC Included)

So it looks like I made it on to the 'net here at Holiday Inn, J... and what's below is the text I read from over the phone, then the emails I sent to Antonio Nicasa, the latter with almost 50 BCC people, including you and that CBC show I mentioned, and lastly the post I made on Calgary Fashion Connection Facebook Group (then 2 even later emails)...

In addition to the email copy below, a big reason why organized crime is not often reported is that it effectively controls access to the police, whether by the answering service they use or by rerouting calls from people with knowledge of some details of how they work (like me) such that they will never let you get to the appropriate level for organized crime investigation in a police service. I've tried - many times - mainly for the RCMP. They also control building access to say, the RCMP in Calgary, again not allowing me to get to the appropriate department (or I was particularly unlucky the only time I tried… to the same end).

Further to controlling airport activities (see email below), at both Calgary and JFK airports they can and have set up 'false gates' to route passengers like me to them, but use different M.O.s. In Calgary, the gate itself was real - and with an associated jet - but said I was sleeping and missed my flight despite calling me over the PA twice. The facts were that I arrived at Gate 12(?) ostensibly for AC 168 at 6:20 AM, said nothing when the Boarding Time of 6:40 went by with no activity, nor when I noted the clock read 6:53, 6:58 and 7:04, approaching the access podium at 6:10 to ask what was happening, which was when they said I'd missed it. Incredibly to me, a plane actually did leave the gate at the appropriate time of 7:15, but no passengers had boarded (there had been someone 'splitting' passengers as they approached security and I suspect all other passengers actually boarded, but at a differing gate. Anyway, I left though one of the podium employees followed me across the gate area and asked something to the effect: "You missed your flight, sir - don't you want us to help get you another?" I politely declined, given that I'd missed it through no mistake of my own and thus had issues around trust of these people. As I couldn't successfully board a flight to Ottawa and no longer felt safe even trying to get home (they have my van), I decided to try to get east via the States.

Briefly, after being blocked because the online reservation would only 'accept' people aged 18-64 (reported to booking agent, BTW), I booked at the gate and travelled Calgary to Denver UA (6385Y), then to Charlotte (USAirways 498 or 555A?) and now here to JFK in NYC (via DL 4284 Boarding Pass for Seat 8D, though my ticket says AC 7923Y from Charlotte to Toronto, which I clearly did not get since I'm in NYC). At JFK - I'm at a Holiday Inn Express flanked by Best Western Kennedy Airport and a Days Inn as I type - I was trying to get to AC 8901 to Toronto via Terminal 7 Gate 12 this Sept 26 AM and things were equally unsettling. Not only was there no ticket given (though I had a Boarding Pass for Seat 11A), but I 'make it' through the body scanner with no alarm at all, and the security staff bypassed a body search as well - both for the very first time since getting a knee replacement last Nov. 11 in Calgary - I wonder what records would even show that I 'left'. Then, instead of any 'normal' gate, the sign for Gates 11, 12 were halfway down some stairs and supposedly through a very narrow passageway off to the left… I just kept walking down and quickly ended in a baggage pickup area. Despite not seeing any airline 'employee' during that short walk, one approached me shortly thereafter and asked if I wasn't taking the flight. Why would any real employee care or even notice, especially given the stairs weren't visible to any employees, at least from my POV? I could use help getting out of New York, and at this point have no idea how I'll try or whether I can even get this text out to someone who cares.

My Skype access has also just been removed, meaning I can't even access the 'net via Boing(?) act JFK proper, given that IMO I now can't safely go through to any (real) gate to board a flight. At the Inn, I was told got use a WiFi password of 'Jets', which I suspect will not get me to the 'normal' WWW. This is analogous to my access at home in Calgary… I've suspected I'm not using the 'Standard' 'net for some time. I'm also certain that others can access my computers, whether via WiFi (which is 'Off' as I type) or even via cellular, at least in Calgary. Also, it seems they may have taken my van and kept some $6K of Nikon gear on that first flight (AC 168, but both need confirmation) plus stolen an iPad bought near the Gate - said iPad was not standard.

Going back to how all this may have started, I'm a photographer who shoots a wide variety of subjects, including nude women, but was recently 'involved' with 3 underage girls wanting to shoot but 2 not initially indicating that they are underage. In addition, an acquaintance said that he heard I shoot porn… not at all true. I have much more on this - related to the groups and site- noted below but it's really only relevant to me if I can safely get to Canada… and be safe there.

Also as I've noted in the email, I *strongly* believe that the Rockyview General - notably Security and Unit 48 (especially Dr. Madan and perhaps nurse Ros) - is being controlled by organized crime as well. As above I have more on this but it's really only relevant to me if I can reach safety get to Canada.

P.S.: If anyone from the CPS might be involved, check the driver of Squad Car 1543, AB plate ZHC - 318 at 9:20 - 9:30 at The Point Inn near Hwy 1, plus Officer 'Mike McGregor Badge 1701' (latter by memory but name/badge be confirmed via a Facebook post). Finally for this, Terminal 4's Palm Bar & Grill refused time and again to give me a Visa receipt for a $79.18 meal, without which I could not prove a paid for it - could they have called airport authorities as another way to try and stop me? Also, my home, John H's and Doug M.'s lines are always 'busy' 3:30-40-ish, Wed Sep 26 via Hotel phone - more than unusual.

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Brett Aubrey <brett.aubrey@yahoo.ca>
To: antonio nicaso <nicaso@nicaso.com>
Cc: Brett Aubrey <brett.aubrey@shaw.ca>; "brett.aubrey@gmail.com" <brett.aubrey@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2012 8:00:22 AM
Subject: Re: Corruption also in Alberta, Canada, whether 'Mafia' or someone else... (BCC Included)

Antonio;

I never did receive a reply from you Sir, but I thought you'd be interested to know that one can realistically add significant influence at the Calgary Airport - very significant influence. I elected to try flying to Ottawa as a first route but failed to leave Calgary due to the most unbelievable set of circumstances you can imagine... well, not you perhaps due to your intimate knowledge, but I submit 'unimaginably unbelievable' to the vast majority of people.
Of course if the Quebec and Ontario 'stories' have any validity at all, it makes complete sense that corruption in a wealthy province like Alberta would exist.

Sincerely, Brett Aubrey - Home: 403-240-3455 Cell: 403-402-3444 Address: 343 Wildwood Dr. SW, Calgary Website: http://www.intersiteimaging.com/ Model Mayhem Page: http://www.modelmayhem.com/1501876
http://www.cbc.ca/player/News/ID/2280866569/

[ Directed P.S.: Sorry Webmaster, but I didn't quickly see a more general email address ]

From: Brett Aubrey <brett.aubrey@yahoo.ca>
To: antonio nicaso <nicaso@nicaso.com>
Cc: Brett Aubrey <brett.aubrey@shaw.ca>; "brett.aubrey@gmail.com" <brett.aubrey@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 10:30:56 AM

Subject: Corruption also in Alberta, Canada, whether 'Mafia' or someone else...

Sir;

My information - partly divulged to others - predates the Sept 18 CBC news item on the Quebec Corruption Inquiry read by Peter Mansbridge which is where I found your name. I note this so you might realise that seeing such news items is not an influence to the scant notes below, but has indeed influenced how I will approach this with the police. I intend going to the RCMP Calgary office at 7575 8 Street NE at around 12:30 today - it's 10:30 here now - and hope to find an ear. I was thinking of flying to Ottawa but will try this route first.

Very briefly, some organized crime group has infiltrated certain persons working for the Calgary health region and more specifically, at the Foothills Medical Centre and the Rockyview General Hospital including the Emergency Departments' Security and other staff, notably those in the RGH's Unit 48. In addition and related, certain individuals using the model/photography website, Model Mayhem and Facebook group 'CALGARY FASHION CONNECTIONS - CFC (Models...)'.

If you have any advice to give in the next 2 hours - noting I've provided almost nothing here - I would appreciate it.

Sincerely, Brett Aubrey - My website: http://www.intersiteimaging.com/ Model Mayhem Page: http://www.modelmayhem.com/1501876

KNOWLEDGE and COMMUNICATIONS - A CFC ISSUE

It's fairly rare that I post here but I've just been through the most unusual communication thread I've encountered in my 2.5 years of shooting models and I submit that it's inappropriate - and should be to all of us - and needs to be addressed with changes implemented such that it doesn't happen again. If anyone disagrees, I'd welcome their position on this matter but to me it seems an open and closed case. In actuality there were 2 separate instances with huge similarities but so as not to muddy the waters, I'll deal with only what I find the most potentially problematic, which also happens to be the latter of the two. To have a group such as this with close to a thousand members and no control seems to me to be greatest underlying factor and that's exacerbated by a lack of information about the members - notably in this case, age - and the nature of the group of dealing frequently with models of almost any age, photographers and photoshoots - in my albeit limited experiences, often in private and/or out of the way settings and venues.

The scenario I'm referring to is a model making more than one post on various related forums waning a shoot. While wording varies, one asked for "anyone" to do a photoshoot of "any type" including "something new smile". When I hit her up privately she said she was down to shoot whenever and whatever I wanted, but no nudes. On asking for a few more guidelines "unless she was being quite literal and is open to anything that isn't 18+? ( 18+ as defined by, say, MM )", she replied affirmatively that she was "open to doing anything that isn't 18+". My understanding of that is that it means anything that doesn't show genitalia or - in a rather sexist manner - female nipples (plus images of a violent nature or suggestive of sexual activity, largely irrelevant to this post).

So whether lingerie, boudoir, the skimpiest of bikinis or any implied including butt naked varieties reasonably falls within her scope, as she specified it. And for more concrete but relative mild examples, anything in my 'People' gallery at: http://intersiteimaging.smugmug.com/Top … ;k=7BZRSdM and an almost infinite variety of shots 'sexier' than that. Also virtually anything on Facebook where there hasn't been manipulations to strategically cover certain parts - say, with those black rectangles one sees. And of course if she wanted to use something like black electrical tape over those same parts, she seemed to be agreeing to 90+ percent of what's on Model Mayhem including most 18+ poses that lack such covering. I felt that this was inappropriate and of course I asked to speak to her mother the minute she also added - at my request - her age. She's 14. Yes, fourteen! (She had included that her Mom would attend when she noted her age.)

At least two other people answered her request online back on Aug 22 and I've sent warnings to them that the model is indeed only 14, but I trust that at least the fairly active member who asked the model: "what theme do you have in mind?" simply never followed up with private messages to this model. Otherwise I'd hope he'd have posted something similar to this - my apologies if I missed it - or he went blithely on with a shoot and only when he read my message found out that she was just 14. The other person - whom I've never seen post before if memory serves - told her that he had "some time available in Sept"… that is, as early as tomorrow. Now I know this would never likely end in any unsavoury manner in this group, but I also suspect that there are 14 year-old girls that would like some images of "any type" including the examples above, and photographers - or Zev's 'fauxtographers' - who might want to provide them. Thus it seems that there is a potential for something unsavoury - again with such a large membership.

To my mind, there are ways to mitigate the possibility of problems, but I'm new here and would like to know if others agree with my concerns and agree that the situation should be looked at. Any input here would be appreciated and I'm also leaving contact information.

Sincerely, Brett Aubrey H: 403-240-3455 (preferred) C: 403-402-3444 (no voice mail) Email: brett.aubrey@yahoo.ca MM: 1501876 Website: http://www.intersiteimaging.com/ - most models mixed in at 'People', nudes and some implied locked elsewhere).

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Brett Aubrey <brett.aubrey@yahoo.ca>
To: "403923xxxx@txt.bell.ca" <403923xxxx@txt.bell.ca>
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 7:52:54 PM
Subject: Re: Cell Status? Location and 613 numbers

J, it would appear that - after 3 quick unanswerable calls in succession from 613-249-8532 and ...-8531(2 calls) - my cell phone may now be 'out' / disabled. I'm in Rm 311 at a Holiday Inn near what's signed as the "Best Western - Kennedy Airport" Hotel very close to a freeway. I'd think you should distribute earlier info quickly. Canadian coins are hidden under the mattress in a nook at the back of an LG TV and at the top of the lamp in the corner as 'proof' I was here if I'm not found to be.

As noted some time ago, things could be happening to unnerve or rattle me and they're working. Please try to call and if I don't hear from you, I may try those 613 (Ottawa) numbers - unsure yet.

Cheers, Brett.

From: Brett Aubrey <brett.aubrey@yahoo.ca>
To: "403923xxxx@txt.bell.ca" <403923xxxx@txt.bell.ca>
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 6:54:01 PM
Subject: The Could Not Process / Adult (age 18 to 64) Default Box and Message

FYI, J...

I just tried booking another United flight to see if the same thing happens as my attempt in Calgary and I go from selecting the flight - i.e. basic flight info like Number and Time - to "Traveler Information" which specifies "Traveler 1 - Adults (age 18 to 64)" by default and indicates that my Jan '47 Date of Birth is not valid. There seems to be no way to change/override the "Traveler 1" default. The Booking Agent has never seen this message and without his help, it seems I couldn't have bough the ticket.

I could check more but this is enuff for now. Still, I admit it could be my error.

Cheers, B.

P.S.: Ooops, seems I can't upload the attachment - a screen shot with the 'error' in this case. Will work on it.

[Rum]

Hi Brett,

Thanks for posting the OP. I seem to see two issues, as far as I can tell. The first seems to be that you have serious concerns that organised crime has a hold on day to day running of various organisations and agencies. The second seems to be about a brush with the possibility of taking nude pictures of under-age girls. I'm not clear from reading if the second actually took place.

I have some concerns and worries about the tone of your posts Brett. There is a certain lack of realism about your first concern that many people would put in the realm of 'delusion'. Most - the majority of people would not take the view that society is controlled in the way you seem to be suggesting - which is not of course to dismiss the impact of organised crime as such.

The second issue must be causing you a lot of stress. I don't know if you can or want to say more either publicly or by PMing someone you feel able to trust here. By all means make it myself if you wish - however you may feel you know other people better.

I think you should find someone to talk with about your ideas and worries. I think probably your GP would be best. If not then someone you know well who can be honest with you about how realistic or otherwise they might be.

In any case take care of yourself.

[FBM]

Brett, I agree with everything Rum has said. There have been a couple of times in the past when I benefitted greatly from getting an objective perspective on my thoughts from someone whose job it is to do just that: take an objective look at others' thoughts. As it turned out, just a few discussions were enough to clear up my troubles. Hope all goes equally well for you. Best.

[BrettA]

First, an update… Interestingly IMO, unusual events are still happening. One forum I posted on last night was very inclusive the United Church of Canada's WonderCafe.ca site, specifically at www.wondercafe.ca/discussion/politics, but my post and the ~7 replies it garnished are no longer there and I as user BrettA am no longer able to log in: 'User name BrettA has not been activated or has been blocked / Access denied…'. Most of the replies expressed confusion while the second last reply from one 'RevJohn' said that he flagged the post because he felt that it was (brief summation) highly paranoid and he was worried about my health and well being ("from where he sits"). My reply to him was similar to:

"I can certainly understand RevJohn but please take comfort in the fact that I'd asked someone more deeply aware of what I'm dealing with for 5 or 6 words to describe what he felt about a part of this and his response was:

Six words - irrefutable evidence trumps paranoia

So it seems to me that the more you know about this, the more comprehensible it becomes, RevJohn. And from where I sit, I'm completely fine and will remain so barring outside influences."

Now why would posts that elicited concern about someone - to the point of being flagged about - be simply deleted? And then the user of whom concern is expressed denied access? RevJohn specifically stated that he wasn't flagging for the usual reasons. As I said, unusual things are still happening.


To your posts, Rum, yes, you have the first concern basically right, though it's also because I've been embroiled in this through no real 'fault' of my own. The 'brush with the possibility' was noted mainly because I posted my concern on the Facebook group "Calgary Fashion Connections - CFC - connecting models, photographers and MUAs" and is no real immediate concern but seemed to be the impetus for much shit to start… most of it not yet mentioned here. However, these events starting in minor ways were enough to want me to report this to the RCMP and that's when the serious shit started, and to a degree is ongoing to a degree, I believe, such as with WonderCafe.ca and deletion of my post. The under age thing to which I referred did not take place - it was merely the reason for my raising it with the CFC group… to no benefit, BTW - as my concerns were brushed off. Again, this was most surprising since I'd strongly suggested it be looked at so it didn't happen with anyone else.

Re your "delusion", as I said to RevJohn, I understand, Rum. While events are unbelievable and would be to me if someone else stated them, they are both true and completely unexaggerated. And while I've been through has been unnerving, there's no need for concern for me if that's what you're suggesting, again barring outside influences. I'm fine :-)! Thanks mutely for the offer of PMing, but anything I write is likely best being public. An feel free to discuss anything here publicly, FBM - I'm an open book. Indeed I'd love you to question any aspect of this you want and I'll answer as best I can.

Also, regarding societal control (your words as I see it), did you note the news item I posted a CBC.ca link about (and there's a later, related one also by Diana Swain and read by Peter Mansbridge - both available at Diana's home page at CBC.ca). I was deep into things here before I saw these, so it's not like they were an influence on me except in minor ways - the shit had already hit the fan. I'm not saying societal control in the way I read you, but 'they' can go to great lengths in controlling a person from reaching the police, and have done so with me. This is not to say I'm important in any way… just that I 'fell into' an area I suspect deals with kiddie porn and I started making noise about it… and have continued to make noise as things got worse.

Please try to apply your 'not to dismiss organized crime'. With it, someone, somewhere will be deeply impacted. I happen to be one of those, again through no 'fault' of my own. It seems rather like the lottery in reverse - we know there are winners but few of us know one personally or even via a forum.

P.S.: What's a GP in your use, please - like an MP perhaps - an elected Member of Parliament representing my riding/area (if this, I'm trying)? Or like a General Physician / Family Doctor (if this, I'm in NYC and this would be way, way out of her experiences)? Or something else? And Indeed I am talking to others, including the person who wrote "Irrefutable evidence trumps paranoia". I'll also be posting more from other sites where questions arose, but sadly, not the now deleted thread on Wonder Cafe. Thoughts?

Cheers, Brett.

[BrettA]

And a bit from RatSkep where I posted the UA denial screen shot and was questioned by Fact-Man-2 and Metatron (if interested, please see the screen shot near the bottom of: http://www.rationalskepticism.org/post1 ... l#p1483956 )...

As per the text, there was no 'selecting' involved at all - it was straight from basic flight info to this as an unchangeable default that even the employee/agent at the gate had never seen. Also as per the text, I tested this out again before posting. But I do understand from whence you come - it's simply unbelievable, but still true - and I thank you for the advice, but yes, I'm fine posting here and elsewhere, as indeed I have done.

Re Fact-Man-2's post partly about what I shoot (or not), here's my Model Mayhem page and my portfolio links:
http://www.modelmayhem.com/1501876
http://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/1501876/viewall (18+ Warning - Adults Only, Please!)

Cheers Brett :-) H: 403-240-3455 (preferred) C: 403-402-3444 (no voice mail) Skype: InImaging Email: Brett.Aubrey@yahoo.ca http://www.intersiteimaging.com/ - most models mixed in at 'People', nudes are locked under 'More Images' > 'Risqué' (password is: 1501876 and you may need to hit 'Submit' 2ce).

[Rum]

Brett,

R.e. you last post but one; 'GP' = General practitioner - family doctor here. I strongly strongly advise that you visit him/her and discuss this stuff with them.

[Bella Fortuna]

Yeah, and I would strongly advise against revealing all this personal data/information online.

[BrettA]

Brett,

R.e. you last post but one; 'GP' = General practitioner - family doctor here. I strongly strongly advise that you visit him/her and discuss this stuff with them.

Well Rum... As I said, I'm in NYC and this is way beyond her experiences. Also, she doesn't take phone calls and it's far too complex by phone, anyway.

But what's your strongly strongly advice re my GP based on, please, Rum?

Cheers, Brett.

[BrettA]

Yeah, and I would strongly advise against revealing all this personal data/information online.

No problem, I'll keep any personal data/info about you out of this - though had no plans to include anything anyway).

Cheers, Brett Aubrey :-) H: 403-240-3455 (preferred) C: 403-402-3444 (no voice mail) Skype: InImaging Website: http://www.intersiteimaging.com/ MM: http://www.modelmayhem.com/1501876 Address: 343 Wildwood Dr. SW, Calgary, AB Canada

[Rum]

Brett,

R.e. you last post but one; 'GP' = General practitioner - family doctor here. I strongly strongly advise that you visit him/her and discuss this stuff with them.

Well Rum... As I said, I'm in NYC and this is way beyond her experiences. Also, she doesn't take phone calls and it's far too complex by phone, anyway.

But what's your strongly strongly advice re my GP based on, please, Rum?

Cheers, Brett.

I am not going to get into a discussion about these issues Brett because I know you will only follow your own line of 'reasoning'. You should talk to a doctor because your thinking about these issues is not realistic and you may be in need of medical attention. I say this from past professional experience and only with good intentions I assure you.

[BrettA]

Oh, and I noticed an error in my OP... Fixed:

---- Forwarded Message -----
From: Brett Aubrey <brett.aubrey@yahoo.ca>
To: "403923xxxx@txt.bell.ca" <403923xxxx@txt.bell.ca>
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 5:31:05 PM

Subject: Fw: Corruption also in Alberta, Canada, whether 'Mafia' or someone else... (BCC Included)

So it looks like I made it on to the 'net here at Holiday Inn, J... and what's below is the text I read from over the phone, then the emails I sent to Antonio Nicasa, the latter with almost 50 BCC people, including you and that CBC show I mentioned, and lastly the post I made on Calgary Fashion Connection Facebook Group (then 2 even later emails)...

In addition to the email copy below, a big reason why organized crime is not often reported is that it effectively controls access to the police, whether by the answering service they use or by rerouting calls from people with knowledge of some details of how they work (like me) such that they will never let you get to the appropriate level for organized crime investigation in a police service. I've tried - many times - mainly for the RCMP. They also control building access to say, the RCMP in Calgary, again not allowing me to get to the appropriate department (or I was particularly unlucky the only time I tried… to the same end).

Further to controlling airport activities (see email below), at both Calgary and JFK airports they can and have set up 'false gates' to route passengers like me to them, but use different M.O.s. In Calgary, the gate itself was real - and with an associated jet - but said I was sleeping and missed my flight despite calling me over the PA twice. The facts were that I arrived at Gate 12(?) ostensibly for AC 168 at 6:20 AM, said nothing when the Boarding Time of 6:40 went by with no activity, nor when I noted the clock read 6:53, 6:58 and 7:04, approaching the access podium at 7:10 to ask what was happening, which was when they said I'd missed it. Incredibly to me, a plane actually did leave the gate at the appropriate time of 7:15, but no passengers had boarded (there had been someone 'splitting' passengers as they approached security and I suspect all other passengers actually boarded, but at a differing gate. Anyway, I left though one of the podium employees followed me across the gate area and asked something to the effect: "You missed your flight, sir - don't you want us to help get you another?" I politely declined, given that I'd missed it through no mistake of my own and thus had issues around trust of these people. As I couldn't successfully board a flight to Ottawa and no longer felt safe even trying to get home (they have my van), I decided to try to get east via the States.

Briefly, after being blocked because the online reservation would only 'accept' people aged 18-64 (reported to booking agent, BTW), I booked at the gate and travelled Calgary to Denver UA (6385Y), then to Charlotte (USAirways 498 or 555A?) and now here to JFK in NYC (via DL 4284 Boarding Pass for Seat 8D, though my ticket says AC 7923Y from Charlotte to Toronto, which I clearly did not get since I'm in NYC). At JFK - I'm at a Holiday Inn Express flanked by Best Western Kennedy Airport and a Days Inn as I type - I was trying to get to AC 8901 to Toronto via Terminal 7 Gate 12 this Sept 26 AM and things were equally unsettling. Not only was there no ticket given (though I had a Boarding Pass for Seat 11A), but I 'make it' through the body scanner with no alarm at all, and the security staff bypassed a body search as well - both for the very first time since getting a knee replacement last Nov. 11 in Calgary - I wonder what records would even show that I 'left'. Then, instead of any 'normal' gate, the sign for Gates 11, 12 were halfway down some stairs and supposedly through a very narrow passageway off to the left… I just kept walking down and quickly ended in a baggage pickup area. Despite not seeing any airline 'employee' during that short walk, one approached me shortly thereafter and asked if I wasn't taking the flight. Why would any real employee care or even notice, especially given the stairs weren't visible to any employees, at least from my POV? I could use help getting out of New York, and at this point have no idea how I'll try or whether I can even get this text out to someone who cares.

My Skype access has also just been removed, meaning I can't even access the 'net via Boing(?) act JFK proper, given that IMO I now can't safely go through to any (real) gate to board a flight. At the Inn, I was told got use a WiFi password of 'Jets', which I suspect will not get me to the 'normal' WWW. This is analogous to my access at home in Calgary… I've suspected I'm not using the 'Standard' 'net for some time. I'm also certain that others can access my computers, whether via WiFi (which is 'Off' as I type) or even via cellular, at least in Calgary. Also, it seems they may have taken my van and kept some $6K of Nikon gear on that first flight (AC 168, but both need confirmation) plus stolen an iPad bought near the Gate - said iPad was not standard.

Going back to how all this may have started, I'm a photographer who shoots a wide variety of subjects, including nude women, but was recently 'involved' with 3 underage girls wanting to shoot but 2 not initially indicating that they are underage. In addition, an acquaintance said that he heard I shoot porn… not at all true. I have much more on this - related to the groups and site- noted below but it's really only relevant to me if I can safely get to Canada… and be safe there.

Also as I've noted in the email, I *strongly* believe that the Rockyview General - notably Security and Unit 48 (especially Dr. Madan and perhaps nurse Ros) - is being controlled by organized crime as well. As above I have more on this but it's really only relevant to me if I can reach safety get to Canada.

P.S.: If anyone from the CPS might be involved, check the driver of Squad Car 1543, AB plate ZHC - 318 at 9:20 - 9:30 at The Point Inn near Hwy 1, plus Officer 'Mike McGregor Badge 1701' (latter by memory but name/badge be confirmed via a Facebook post). Finally for this, Terminal 4's Palm Bar & Grill refused time and again to give me a Visa receipt for a $79.18 meal, without which I could not prove a paid for it - could they have called airport authorities as another way to try and stop me? Also, my home, John H's and Doug M.'s lines are always 'busy' 3:30-40-ish, Wed Sep 26 via Hotel phone - more than unusual

[Thinking Aloud]

Brett - just looked at your UA screenshot. Your date format (the part of your details that show an error in red) is entered DD/MM/YYYY - if it's UA, they may require MM/DD/YYYY. Have you checked that?

[BrettA]

Brett, R.e. you last post but one; 'GP' = General practitioner - family doctor here. I strongly strongly advise that you visit him/her and discuss this stuff with them.

Well Rum... As I said, I'm in NYC and this is way beyond her experiences. Also, she doesn't take phone calls and it's far too complex by phone, anyway.

But what's your strongly strongly advice re my GP based on, please, Rum? Cheers, Brett.

I am not going to get into a discussion about these issues Brett because I know you will only follow your own line of 'reasoning'. You should talk to a doctor because your thinking about these issues is not realistic and you may be in need of medical attention. I say this from past professional experience and only with good intentions I assure you.

OK, thank you Rum and most of that was largely clear with your earlier post. So again, why do you think that I "should talk to a doctor because your thinking about these issues is not realistic"? What's your professional experience that indicates this, please? Psychiatric? Medical? Organized crime? Or something else entirely, please? TIA.

[Rum]

Brett, I was a psychiatric social worker for part of my career. I have experience of working with people whose thinking becomes disordered. I would suggest from you posts (limited evidence I am aware) that this may be the case with your good self. Give it some thought if you can.

[Twoflower]

Hi Brett,
If you are unable to fly back to Canada have you considered renting a car and driving back? I know it isn't very far from New York and then you would be in control for the duration of the drive.