Coito ergo sum wrote:Non sequitur.
Yeah right. "I just luv drawing Mohammed.....
as long as I can do it anonymously".
Right - he didn't use those exact words, like "I'm sorry," so it's not literal. But, in context, he was apologetic.
That's your opinion.
It wasn't warranted in the accidental burning thing either.
Seriously? The US gov't accidentally burns a bunch of books that are holy to a group of people we're trying to be allies with, and you don't see that as a reason for the US gov't to say "Sorry 'bout that"? FFS.
LOL -- keep drinking the Kool Aid.
Riiiiiight....images of a US President following diplomatic protocol. How shocking!
Barack Obama: 'arrogant US has been dismissive' to allies
President Barack Obama has offered an apology for the Bush era, declaring that America had “shown arrogance and been dismissive, even derisive” towards its allies.
That's not an apology, that's describing reality. The Bush approach to foreign policy was "you're either with us or against us" and "we'll do whatever we want, whenever we want, and fuck anyone who dares to object".
Barack Obama's Top 10 Apologies: How the President Has Humiliated a Superpower
http://www.heritage.org/research/report ... superpower[/quote]
And none of those are actual apologies. Just right-wingers thinking that the US is absolutely perfect and cannot ever do anything wrong. You do understand the difference between "Yeah, my predecessor was kind of a dick, but I'm here now and things will be different" and "The US Gov't officially apologizes for the Bush years", don't you?
No...I doubt you do.