rasetsu wrote:
I side with...
- Warren Dew
- Posts: 3781
- Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:41 pm
- Location: Somerville, MA, USA
- Contact:
Re: I side with...
There's no clash. The economy is part of society.trdsf wrote:What flavor of libertarian -- social or economic? I'm guessing economic; they seem to have taken control of the party.Randydeluxe wrote:And here's my result when I answered the quiz with the beliefs of a Libertarian:
That's always been the deep dark secret of the Libertarian Party that they don't like to talk about--that there's this fissure at the core of the party between the social libertarians and the economic libertarians. It shows up as soon as there's a clash between individual rights and laissez-faire. It is not possible for both to be absolute; either the economy is the servant of society, or society is the servant of the economy.
Personally, given a choice between the two, I'll take the former.
There is a split on whether fetuses are to be treated as human beings. There used to be alleged libertarians who were actually pro-business rather than in favor of the free market, but I haven't met one in ages.
- Randydeluxe
- Filled With Aloha
- Posts: 642
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 7:01 am
- About me: Ua mau ke ea o ka 'aina i ka pono.
- Location: SoCal. Previously Honolulu, HI. Previously Vancouver, BC. Sometimes Austin, TX.
- Contact:
Re: I side with...
In the U.S., Libertarian just means:trdsf wrote:What flavor of libertarian -- social or economic? I'm guessing economic; they seem to have taken control of the party.Randydeluxe wrote:And here's my result when I answered the quiz with the beliefs of a Libertarian:
That's always been the deep dark secret of the Libertarian Party that they don't like to talk about--that there's this fissure at the core of the party between the social libertarians and the economic libertarians. It shows up as soon as there's a clash between individual rights and laissez-faire. It is not possible for both to be absolute; either the economy is the servant of society, or society is the servant of the economy.
Personally, given a choice between the two, I'll take the former.
Socially liberal
and
Demonstrably, provably, consistently, uniformly wrong on economics.
Re: I side with...
Oh hey, it looks like your trying to start a libertarian thread. Can I redirect you to another thread with an appropriate name to discuss that? K, thanks.
Nobody expects me...
- Warren Dew
- Posts: 3781
- Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:41 pm
- Location: Somerville, MA, USA
- Contact:
Re: I side with...
Nah, that's Democrats.Randydeluxe wrote:In the U.S., Libertarian just means:
Socially liberal
and
Demonstrably, provably, consistently, uniformly wrong on economics.
- trdsf
- Posts: 583
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 7:44 am
- About me: High functioning sociopath. With your number.
- Location: Columbus, Ohio
- Contact:
Re: I side with...
No, not particularly interested in starting a thread on it. I actually was more curious if he was using social or economic libertarianism as his baseline. I haven't had much use for the theory since a brief dalliance with it in college.Drewish wrote:Oh hey, it looks like your trying to start a libertarian thread. Can I redirect you to another thread with an appropriate name to discuss that? K, thanks.
"The ships hung in the sky in much the same way that bricks don't." -- Douglas Adams, The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests
