I certainly don't agree with that... until the 1500s, the murder rate was not that low due to lack of guns, and the generalisation of firearms in the 3 following centuries did not correlate a huge rise of homicides, just a higher ratio of direarm murders in the global number.Blind groper wrote:The reference I checked showed the level of incarceration in New Hampshire was related far more to ethnicity than criminality.Warren Dew wrote: So your excuse is that you don't put criminals in jail, even though doing so would be more effective in preventing murder than banning guns? Me, I'd rather put the criminals in jail and have the lower murder rate.
Yes, in NZ, we do put criminals in prison. That certainly includes murderers. But our low murder rate (1.4, not 1.7) is due to a lack of guns.
When there's murder to be done, and no guns, people will use other means, and they are quite ingenious in that regard. Firearm assault and murder rates are very low in the UK due to firearms being scarce, overall violent crime using other means (fists and feet, blunt objects, knives, etc) are relatively high for western Europe.