Indeed. If I remember correctly something I looked up several years ago, Montana is about 3x the size of Korea, but the population of what in Korea would be considered a small town.rasetsu wrote:This is what happens when people don't vote. And in Montana, it's not because of apathy, it's because nobody lives there. Even if they get everybody to turn out at the polls, they still can't manage a quorum. In Montana the swing vote is like Schrodinger's ballot box; all it takes is one guy to flip the state from red to blue. All it takes is one person staying home to care for a sick sheep to change the entire political map of the state. (Or more realistically, one sheep appearing unusually coquettish for that time of year.)
Could we just go ahead and give Montana away?
- FBM
- Ratz' first Gritizen.
- Posts: 45327
- Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:43 pm
- About me: Skeptic. "Because it does not contend
It is therefore beyond reproach" - Contact:
Re: Could we just go ahead and give Montana away?
"A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it." ~ H. L. Mencken
"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."
"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."
- Warren Dew
- Posts: 3781
- Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:41 pm
- Location: Somerville, MA, USA
- Contact:
Re: Could we just go ahead and give Montana away?
I suspect bison would be successful enough in Montana that they'd soon need a hunting season.Tyrannical wrote:So, basically he is afraid the federal government is purposely moving endangered species onto oil rich land to prevent future drilling.
That sounds like something the Greens would try.
- Tyrannical
- Posts: 6468
- Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:59 am
- Contact:
Re: Could we just go ahead and give Montana away?
Oil pipelines as I recall radiate enough heat to melt the snow, thus making them attractive to wildlife.Warren Dew wrote:I suspect bison would be successful enough in Montana that they'd soon need a hunting season.Tyrannical wrote:So, basically he is afraid the federal government is purposely moving endangered species onto oil rich land to prevent future drilling.
That sounds like something the Greens would try.
A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: Could we just go ahead and give Montana away?
If they don't block migration trails, that is.Tyrannical wrote:Oil pipelines as I recall radiate enough heat to melt the snow, thus making them attractive to wildlife.Warren Dew wrote:I suspect bison would be successful enough in Montana that they'd soon need a hunting season.Tyrannical wrote:So, basically he is afraid the federal government is purposely moving endangered species onto oil rich land to prevent future drilling.
That sounds like something the Greens would try.
Re: Could we just go ahead and give Montana away?
And that's exactly what they are doing. It's all part of the grand "rewilding" plan for the west, in which most of the land west of the Mississippi is deliberately depopulated of humans, who are sent to live in highly dense urban "gulags" while the critters are allowed to retake the rest of the land and humans are prohibited from entering their "natural habitat."Tyrannical wrote:So, basically he is afraid the federal government is purposely moving endangered species onto oil rich land to prevent future drilling.
That sounds like something the Greens would try.
It's not at all far-fetched that Obama and his green minions in the Department of Agriculture might have just such a plan in mind, particularly given the fact that the government has already decided to ban drilling for oil on the Montana front.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S
"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke
"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth
© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.
"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke
"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth
© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
- Svartalf
- Offensive Grail Keeper
- Posts: 41178
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: Paris France
- Contact:
Re: Could we just go ahead and give Montana away?
More likely he's been having fun with the pretty 'shrooms growing on the bizon patties.maiforpeace wrote:Cuckoo!!!
All that bison methane is getting to the guy's head.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
- Tero
- Just saying
- Posts: 51687
- Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
- About me: 8-34-20
- Location: USA
- Contact:
Re: Could we just go ahead and give Montana away?
Where do I sign up to support this plan?Seth wrote:And that's exactly what they are doing. It's all part of the grand "rewilding" plan for the west, in which most of the land west of the Mississippi is deliberately depopulated of humans, who are sent to live in highly dense urban "gulags" while the critters are allowed to retake the rest of the land and humans are prohibited from entering their "natural habitat."Tyrannical wrote:So, basically he is afraid the federal government is purposely moving endangered species onto oil rich land to prevent future drilling.
That sounds like something the Greens would try.
It's not at all far-fetched that Obama and his green minions in the Department of Agriculture might have just such a plan in mind, particularly given the fact that the government has already decided to ban drilling for oil on the Montana front.
- mistermack
- Posts: 15093
- Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:57 am
- About me: Never rong.
- Contact:
Re: Could we just go ahead and give Montana away?
From what I've heard, the oil IS being extracted, faster than expected, and using hydraulic fracturing of the rocks.
Very little chance of a ban, when it's ongoing.
Very little chance of a ban, when it's ongoing.
While there is a market for shit, there will be assholes to supply it.
- amused
- amused
- Posts: 3873
- Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 11:04 pm
- About me: Reinvention phase initiated
- Contact:
Re: Could we just go ahead and give Montana away?
Which part? Putting people in gulags, or putting animals on top of oilfields?Tero wrote:Where do I sign up to support this plan?Seth wrote:And that's exactly what they are doing. It's all part of the grand "rewilding" plan for the west, in which most of the land west of the Mississippi is deliberately depopulated of humans, who are sent to live in highly dense urban "gulags" while the critters are allowed to retake the rest of the land and humans are prohibited from entering their "natural habitat."Tyrannical wrote:So, basically he is afraid the federal government is purposely moving endangered species onto oil rich land to prevent future drilling.
That sounds like something the Greens would try.
It's not at all far-fetched that Obama and his green minions in the Department of Agriculture might have just such a plan in mind, particularly given the fact that the government has already decided to ban drilling for oil on the Montana front.
- Tero
- Just saying
- Posts: 51687
- Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
- About me: 8-34-20
- Location: USA
- Contact:
Re: Could we just go ahead and give Montana away?
Both. We have the gulags already. Nobody needs 10 acres and a pickup to live on.
- Gallstones
- Supreme Absolute And Exclusive Ruler Of The World
- Posts: 8888
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:56 am
- About me: A fleck on a flake on a speck.
Re: Could we just go ahead and give Montana away?
But here’s the thing about rights. They’re not actually supposed to be voted on. That’s why they’re called rights. ~Rachel Maddow August 2010
The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter
The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter
- Gallstones
- Supreme Absolute And Exclusive Ruler Of The World
- Posts: 8888
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:56 am
- About me: A fleck on a flake on a speck.
Re: Could we just go ahead and give Montana away?
Tero wrote:Both. We have the gulags already. Nobody needs 10 acres and a pickup to live on.
BTW, we don't live on the pickup.
But here’s the thing about rights. They’re not actually supposed to be voted on. That’s why they’re called rights. ~Rachel Maddow August 2010
The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter
The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: Could we just go ahead and give Montana away?
Gallstones, could you start an "Independent Montana Movement" then? I'd send money.
- Tero
- Just saying
- Posts: 51687
- Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
- About me: 8-34-20
- Location: USA
- Contact:
Re: Could we just go ahead and give Montana away?
Good plan. Ship all the guns and pickups to Montana. When I get to be dictator, we don't allow pick ups, only vans. Then the craps stays mostly inside the vehicle other than the odd ladder falling off. No washing machines or couches, though.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests