Duh..Teh Stupidest question Dawkins has ever had? WTF?
Re: Teh Stupidest question Dawkins has ever had? WTF?
It's his job to educate the public on the understanding of science. Nice to see he's earning his paycheque 
Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.
Re: Teh Stupidest question Dawkins has ever had? WTF?
Nobody expects me...
-
PsychoSerenity
- "I" Self-Perceive Recursively
- Posts: 7824
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:57 am
- Contact:
Re: Teh Stupidest question Dawkins has ever had? WTF?
Wow! 
I'm genuinely impressed with Dawkins for even attempting to respond to that. It's just so much stupid, I wouldn't know where to begin.
I'm genuinely impressed with Dawkins for even attempting to respond to that. It's just so much stupid, I wouldn't know where to begin.
[Disclaimer - if this is comes across like I think I know what I'm talking about, I want to make it clear that I don't. I'm just trying to get my thoughts down]
-
Tero
- Just saying
- Posts: 51327
- Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
- About me: 15-32-25
- Location: USA
- Contact:
Re: Teh Stupidest question Dawkins has ever had? WTF?
Cecil Adams in Straight Dope once gave a very polite answer to "why are manhole covers round?"
-
Mallardz
- Definitely not Even Liam!
- Posts: 3529
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:08 pm
- Location: Stratford City, London, GB
- Contact:
Re: Teh Stupidest question Dawkins has ever had? WTF?
I think it's a grand question...
Ratz it's more addictive than facebook and more fun than crack!
-
Blind groper
- Posts: 3997
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 3:10 am
- About me: From New Zealand
- Contact:
Re: Teh Stupidest question Dawkins has ever had? WTF?
The guy asking the question did not appear to understand anything about evolution - not even the basic concept. You would have to take him back to the most basic of ideas, and start him again from ground up. Even then, I suspect he would reject the beginnings, and continue to ask dopey questions.
The thing I wonder is if the guy was just plain stupid, or was refusing to learn. Some (most?) anti-evolutionists are like that. You cannot teach them even the most basic concepts, since they reject them and refuse to absorb any knowledge at all about the process.
The thing I wonder is if the guy was just plain stupid, or was refusing to learn. Some (most?) anti-evolutionists are like that. You cannot teach them even the most basic concepts, since they reject them and refuse to absorb any knowledge at all about the process.
For every human action, there is a rationalisation and a reason. Only sometimes do they coincide.
-
Tero
- Just saying
- Posts: 51327
- Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
- About me: 15-32-25
- Location: USA
- Contact:
Re: Teh Stupidest question Dawkins has ever had? WTF?
It's like the Ray Comfort routine where the guy animal hangs around for millions of years because the female has not been invented.
-
FBM
- Ratz' first Gritizen.
- Posts: 45327
- Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:43 pm
- About me: Skeptic. "Because it does not contend
It is therefore beyond reproach" - Contact:
Re: Teh Stupidest question Dawkins has ever had? WTF?
Oh, boy. Who waters this guy twice a week?
"A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it." ~ H. L. Mencken
"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."
"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."
-
Tyrannical
- Posts: 6468
- Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:59 am
- Contact:
Re: Teh Stupidest question Dawkins has ever had? WTF?
Didn't seem that dumb of a question.
Complex organs that develop must always give a competitive advantage at every stage of development or they would never have evolved under natural selection. His specific example of taking a leak was just a WTF.
Complex organs that develop must always give a competitive advantage at every stage of development or they would never have evolved under natural selection. His specific example of taking a leak was just a WTF.
A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.
-
Pappa
- Non-Practicing Anarchist
- Posts: 56488
- Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:42 am
- About me: I am sacrificing a turnip as I type.
- Location: Le sud du Pays de Galles.
- Contact:
Re: Teh Stupidest question Dawkins has ever had? WTF?
Not necessarily. As long as they don't put the organism at significant disadvantage they can stick around indefinitely.Tyrannical wrote:Didn't seem that dumb of a question.
Complex organs that develop must always give a competitive advantage at every stage of development or they would never have evolved under natural selection. His specific example of taking a leak was just a WTF.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests