
US Prez Election 2012 Thread - Social Darwinism derail
- Pappa
- Non-Practicing Anarchist
- Posts: 56488
- Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:42 am
- About me: I am sacrificing a turnip as I type.
- Location: Le sud du Pays de Galles.
- Contact:
Re: US Prez Election 2012 Thread - Social Darwinism derail
What is this "pure white" of which you speak? 

- Tyrannical
- Posts: 6468
- Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:59 am
- Contact:
Re: US Prez Election 2012 Thread - Social Darwinism derail
I think you know what I speak of already, so why pose the question? If you are truly just ignorant of the matter, IQ scores were normalized to an average of 100 from a certain group of people. But I suspect you knew that also.Pappa wrote:What is this "pure white" of which you speak?
I waste far too much time as it is answering troll questions, if you have a specific point than make or ask it

A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.
- maiforpeace
- Account Suspended at Member's Request
- Posts: 15726
- Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 1:41 am
- Location: under the redwood trees
Re: US Prez Election 2012 Thread - Opinions and Discussions
Now I get to say WOW.Drewish wrote:I do hold contempt for the poor. I came from them, but I left that behind because I worked for it and I'm better than them. It's just that simple.
I wonder how that makes some of the poor members of Rationalia feel. But who cares, eh? As long as you stick to your principles?
Atheists have always argued that this world is all that we have, and that our duty is to one another to make the very most and best of it. ~Christopher Hitchens~
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3534/379 ... 3be9_o.jpg[/imgc]
- Pappa
- Non-Practicing Anarchist
- Posts: 56488
- Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:42 am
- About me: I am sacrificing a turnip as I type.
- Location: Le sud du Pays de Galles.
- Contact:
Re: US Prez Election 2012 Thread - Social Darwinism derail
IQ scores are continually normalised to an average of 100 over the whole population, so I'm not sure what you mean by "were".Tyrannical wrote:I think you know what I speak of already, so why pose the question? If you are truly just ignorant of the matter, IQ scores were normalized to an average of 100 from a certain group of people. But I suspect you knew that also.Pappa wrote:What is this "pure white" of which you speak?
I waste far too much time as it is answering troll questions, if you have a specific point than make or ask it
The point I was getting at is... what do you mean by "white". White Europeans are a varied and mongrel bunch, there's a lot of genetic and ethnic variation between and within different countries/cultures.
- mistermack
- Posts: 15093
- Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:57 am
- About me: Never rong.
- Contact:
Re: US Prez Election 2012 Thread - Opinions and Discussions
I'm surprised that you're so wonderful, because I got the impression that you were a real twat.Drewish wrote: I was born into a poor household and worked since I was 9 years old. I lent my parents a few thousand dollars at the age of 14 to help them buy their first house. I went to college on a merit based full tuition scholarship. I'm a fairly generous person and because I paid for things (with money I had earned) and because I'm a well spoken white guy, people assumed I came from money. I know how people treat those they think were born with a silver spoon in their mouth. I know how entitled the poor are and how they blame everyone but themselves for their own misfortune. I do hold contempt for the poor. I came from them, but I left that behind because I worked for it and I'm better than them. It's just that simple.
It seems I stand corrected.
While there is a market for shit, there will be assholes to supply it.
- Tyrannical
- Posts: 6468
- Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:59 am
- Contact:
Re: US Prez Election 2012 Thread - Social Darwinism derail
I mean the original population against which an IQ of 100 was set as average, and how it is calibrated. If you don't already know what that is, then you can't have any valid views on the subject. A rational discussion requires at least a precursory understanding of what is being discussed.Pappa wrote:IQ scores are continually normalised to an average of 100 over the whole population, so I'm not sure what you mean by "were".Tyrannical wrote:I think you know what I speak of already, so why pose the question? If you are truly just ignorant of the matter, IQ scores were normalized to an average of 100 from a certain group of people. But I suspect you knew that also.Pappa wrote:What is this "pure white" of which you speak?
I waste far too much time as it is answering troll questions, if you have a specific point than make or ask it
The point I was getting at is... what do you mean by "white". White Europeans are a varied and mongrel bunch, there's a lot of genetic and ethnic variation between and within different countries/cultures.
A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.
- Pappa
- Non-Practicing Anarchist
- Posts: 56488
- Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:42 am
- About me: I am sacrificing a turnip as I type.
- Location: Le sud du Pays de Galles.
- Contact:
Re: US Prez Election 2012 Thread - Social Darwinism derail
None of that matters in relation to the question I was asking.Tyrannical wrote:I mean the original population against which an IQ of 100 was set as average, and how it is calibrated. If you don't already know what that is, then you can't have any valid views on the subject. A rational discussion requires at least a precursory understanding of what is being discussed.Pappa wrote:IQ scores are continually normalised to an average of 100 over the whole population, so I'm not sure what you mean by "were".Tyrannical wrote:I think you know what I speak of already, so why pose the question? If you are truly just ignorant of the matter, IQ scores were normalized to an average of 100 from a certain group of people. But I suspect you knew that also.Pappa wrote:What is this "pure white" of which you speak?
I waste far too much time as it is answering troll questions, if you have a specific point than make or ask it
The point I was getting at is... what do you mean by "white". White Europeans are a varied and mongrel bunch, there's a lot of genetic and ethnic variation between and within different countries/cultures.
Re: US Prez Election 2012 Thread - Opinions and Discussions
maiforpeace wrote:Now I get to say WOW.Drewish wrote:I do hold contempt for the poor. I came from them, but I left that behind because I worked for it and I'm better than them. It's just that simple.
I wonder how that makes some of the poor members of Rationalia feel. But who cares, eh? As long as you stick to your principles?
Yep, clearly I'm a horrible person because fuck judging people based on how they treat others or act in their own personal lives, it's about whether or not you agree with their political views!mistermack wrote:I'm surprised that you're so wonderful, because I got the impression that you were a real twat.Drewish wrote: I was born into a poor household and worked since I was 9 years old. I lent my parents a few thousand dollars at the age of 14 to help them buy their first house. I went to college on a merit based full tuition scholarship. I'm a fairly generous person and because I paid for things (with money I had earned) and because I'm a well spoken white guy, people assumed I came from money. I know how people treat those they think were born with a silver spoon in their mouth. I know how entitled the poor are and how they blame everyone but themselves for their own misfortune. I do hold contempt for the poor. I came from them, but I left that behind because I worked for it and I'm better than them. It's just that simple.
It seems I stand corrected.
Nobody expects me...
- amused
- amused
- Posts: 3873
- Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 11:04 pm
- About me: Reinvention phase initiated
- Contact:
Re: US Prez Election 2012 Thread - Opinions and Discussions
No.Drewish wrote:So now I'm a white supremacist? Can I just post my position without people labeling me with outlandish claims?
You tried this weasel approach over at MindRomp and got your ass handed to you on a plate. So you crybabied away with your tail tucked between your assless legs.
On the intertubes you are what you say. You can't make white supremacist statements and then crybaby about being called a white supremacist.
Re: US Prez Election 2012 Thread - Opinions and Discussions
Is that really what you tell yourself, that you just have political views that most people don't like? Hasn't it occurred to you that your political views are based on judging other people (whole groups of them in fact) to be inherently less than you are? Or are you just naive enough to think that everyone has the same equal access to a meritocracy which you feel has helped you so much?Drewish wrote: Yep, clearly I'm a horrible person because fuck judging people based on how they treat others or act in their own personal lives, it's about whether or not you agree with their political views!
- Robert_S
- Cookie Monster
- Posts: 13416
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
- About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
- Location: Illinois
- Contact:
Re: US Prez Election 2012 Thread - Social Darwinism derail
I'll just post some thoughts on meritocracy and race from a successful person of relatively recent African ancestry.
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P
The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange
-Mr P
The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange
Re: US Prez Election 2012 Thread - Opinions and Discussions
Nope. I left that forum because somebody asked me specifically to make a thread explaining my beliefs on something and no less than 4 people started attacking me personally. There's been no weaseling out of anything. I'm stating what I think plainly. When a misunderstanding occurs I clarify. It takes so little for those claiming to be "open and accepting" to show their true colors, just somebody expressing an opinion that "deeply offends" them. My goal is not to convince you, and know such a thing is impossible, but to be articulate and up front so that those who are not coming in with a preconceived notion can hear an accurate representation of my views. You would do well to express your own position rather than attempting to force through a straw man of mine. You are preaching only to the choir.amused wrote:No.Drewish wrote:So now I'm a white supremacist? Can I just post my position without people labeling me with outlandish claims?
You tried this weasel approach over at MindRomp and got your ass handed to you on a plate. So you crybabied away with your tail tucked between your assless legs.
On the intertubes you are what you say. You can't make white supremacist statements and then crybaby about being called a white supremacist.
Perhaps no one who has not already made up their mind will read this, so the discussion is ultimately pointless. In that case you might try conversing without lowering yourself to such a level as to calling me a 'crybaby' and saying that I "got my ass handed to me" as it is both contrary to what you yourself would claim is acceptable in respectful discourse, and because I am avoiding such direct personal attacks. Just think on that.
EDIT -
I'm not going to watch that clip by Chris Rock. His voice is like the horrible screeching noise that styrofoam sometimes makes
Nobody expects me...
Re: US Prez Election 2012 Thread - Opinions and Discussions
This is not the case at all, though it's a valid point to make as I can see how one might think that given what has been said so far. My political views are not in fact the result of demographic breakdowns. The issue regarding my own bias against the poor was in response to someone (I believe Mia) saying that I was bias against the poor. My views are not the result of such a bias, but I do have such a bias, so it would be dishonest of me to claim that I do not. Now it could be that because I admit to such a bias that people will now refuse to believe that my views could be based on anything other than that bias, but whatever you think of me as a person, dishonesty or misrepresenting myself or my views to make them more palatable is certainly not something I'm doing.Ian wrote:Is that really what you tell yourself, that you just have political views that most people don't like? Hasn't it occurred to you that your political views are based on judging other people (whole groups of them in fact) to be inherently less than you are? Or are you just naive enough to think that everyone has the same equal access to a meritocracy which you feel has helped you so much?Drewish wrote: Yep, clearly I'm a horrible person because fuck judging people based on how they treat others or act in their own personal lives, it's about whether or not you agree with their political views!
Nobody expects me...
- amused
- amused
- Posts: 3873
- Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 11:04 pm
- About me: Reinvention phase initiated
- Contact:
Re: US Prez Election 2012 Thread - Opinions and Discussions
Drewish wrote:Nope. I left that forum because somebody asked me specifically to make a thread explaining my beliefs on something and no less than 4 people started attacking me personally. There's been no weaseling out of anything. I'm stating what I think plainly. When a misunderstanding occurs I clarify. It takes so little for those claiming to be "open and accepting" to show their true colors, just somebody expressing an opinion that "deeply offends" them. My goal is not to convince you, and know such a thing is impossible, but to be articulate and up front so that those who are not coming in with a preconceived notion can hear an accurate representation of my views. You would do well to express your own position rather than attempting to force through a straw man of mine. You are preaching only to the choir.amused wrote:No.Drewish wrote:So now I'm a white supremacist? Can I just post my position without people labeling me with outlandish claims?
You tried this weasel approach over at MindRomp and got your ass handed to you on a plate. So you crybabied away with your tail tucked between your assless legs.
On the intertubes you are what you say. You can't make white supremacist statements and then crybaby about being called a white supremacist.
Perhaps no one who has not already made up their mind will read this, so the discussion is ultimately pointless. In that case you might try conversing without lowering yourself to such a level as to calling me a 'crybaby' and saying that I "got my ass handed to me" as it is both contrary to what you yourself would claim is acceptable in respectful discourse, and because I am avoiding such direct personal attacks. Just think on that.

Your ass was handed to you, grilled, filleted, and skewered. You couldn't take it, so you ran.
If you make statements about what you believe, and those statements are consistent with a definition, then you've defined yourself by saying what you believe. A white supremacist.
- Audley Strange
- "I blame the victim"
- Posts: 7485
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 5:00 pm
- Contact:
Re: US Prez Election 2012 Thread - Opinions and Discussions
Drewish wrote: I was born into a poor household and worked since I was 9 years old. I lent my parents a few thousand dollars at the age of 14 to help them buy their first house. I went to college on a merit based full tuition scholarship. I'm a fairly generous person and because I paid for things (with money I had earned) and because I'm a well spoken white guy, people assumed I came from money. I know how people treat those they think were born with a silver spoon in their mouth. I know how entitled the poor are and how they blame everyone but themselves for their own misfortune. I do hold contempt for the poor. I came from them, but I left that behind because I worked for it and I'm better than them. It's just that simple.
First off I agree with much of what your saying I have my own sob story about being poor but it is irrelevant, like you I worked like fuck to get to a decent standard of living and I also think there is a culture of indolence and snobbery within the poor community, but it is not exclusive to the poor. You're not some Randian super-individual, tonnes of people pull themselves out of the gutter, this doesn't mean you're special it only means you were not comfortable in your lifestyle or aware life could be better.
I don't have contempt for the poor, I have contempt to the socially detrimental. On a local level, certainly the illiterate peasants that spawn children like people do shits, that clog up the public sector with their disastrous lives, that squander opportunities others are not given because they have the privilege of being "disadvantaged." Yeah those folk suck.
However on a social level they are impacted upon more than they impact by various other groups of socially detrimental people, like those who think we should cut the poor's access to things like education and a decent environment. It is worse to come from a background of advantage and to squander all one's opportunties and like the poor blaming the rich for all their woes the rich blame the poor for all theirs.
The problem is not poor people, though some poor people are the problem.
You know what the problem is, indolent cunts who think they are better than others, no matter what class or social strata they belong to. Stupid fuckers who think their perception of themselves is legitimate when all evidence points towards them being wrong. Greedy pricks that don't grasp you can be impoverished in other ways but financial.
In short the problem is as it has always been, arseholes. Not the poor, but arseholes that are poor. Not the rich but arseholes who are rich, not Christians, but arseholes who are christians and so on.
To use someone's economic standing alone as a judgement of their social worth is what an arsehole would do. Knock it off.
"What started as a legitimate effort by the townspeople of Salem to identify, capture and kill those who did Satan's bidding quickly deteriorated into a witch hunt" Army Man
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 13 guests