Syria - will the hawks stay on their perches?

User avatar
Clinton Huxley
19th century monkeybitch.
Posts: 23746
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:34 pm
Contact:

Syria - will the hawks stay on their perches?

Post by Clinton Huxley » Wed May 30, 2012 12:49 pm

All hotting up in Syria after the sickening massacre of civilians, including children, in the news now. Diplomats expelled, newspapers (eg the Times) calling for WAR. China and particularly Russia holding out to protect their own commercial and geopolitical interests and vetoing resolutions at the UN.

So, should "the West" intervene? Can we intervene if the Russians say "No"? Should the Syrian regime be given a kicking or is it none of our business how many of its own people it slaughters?
Do those with the ability to intervene have a responsibility to intervene? Or would we just make it worse?
"I grow old … I grow old …
I shall wear the bottoms of my trousers rolled"

AND MERRY XMAS TO ONE AND All!

Imagehttp://25kv.co.uk/date_counter.php?date ... 20counting!!![/img-sig]

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: Syria - will the hawks stay on their perches?

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Wed May 30, 2012 1:22 pm

Clinton Huxley wrote:All hotting up in Syria after the sickening massacre of civilians, including children, in the news now. Diplomats expelled, newspapers (eg the Times) calling for WAR. China and particularly Russia holding out to protect their own commercial and geopolitical interests and vetoing resolutions at the UN.

So, should "the West" intervene? Can we intervene if the Russians say "No"? Should the Syrian regime be given a kicking or is it none of our business how many of its own people it slaughters?
Do those with the ability to intervene have a responsibility to intervene? Or would we just make it worse?
If we do, people will give us hell for it.
If we don't, people will give us hell for it.
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Syria - will the hawks stay on their perches?

Post by Coito ergo sum » Wed May 30, 2012 1:37 pm

Clinton Huxley wrote:All hotting up in Syria after the sickening massacre of civilians, including children, in the news now. Diplomats expelled, newspapers (eg the Times) calling for WAR. China and particularly Russia holding out to protect their own commercial and geopolitical interests and vetoing resolutions at the UN.

So, should "the West" intervene? Can we intervene if the Russians say "No"? Should the Syrian regime be given a kicking or is it none of our business how many of its own people it slaughters?
Do those with the ability to intervene have a responsibility to intervene? Or would we just make it worse?
Isn't the alleged humanitarian just another smoke screen for a capitalist war for oil? Or, is that not this time? :ask:

User avatar
Ian
Mr Incredible
Posts: 16975
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 6:42 pm
Location: Washington DC

Re: Syria - will the hawks stay on their perches?

Post by Ian » Wed May 30, 2012 1:46 pm

I think it's time for Turkey to go whup some butt.

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Syria - will the hawks stay on their perches?

Post by Coito ergo sum » Wed May 30, 2012 1:49 pm

Gawdzilla wrote:
Clinton Huxley wrote:All hotting up in Syria after the sickening massacre of civilians, including children, in the news now. Diplomats expelled, newspapers (eg the Times) calling for WAR. China and particularly Russia holding out to protect their own commercial and geopolitical interests and vetoing resolutions at the UN.

So, should "the West" intervene? Can we intervene if the Russians say "No"? Should the Syrian regime be given a kicking or is it none of our business how many of its own people it slaughters?
Do those with the ability to intervene have a responsibility to intervene? Or would we just make it worse?
If we do, people will give us hell for it.
If we don't, people will give us hell for it.
As for the US in particular, if we get involved, we're told that it's none of our business and we are just oppressing brown people again.

If we don't get involved, we're told the US is abdicating its responsibility....

Maybe if France and Germany want in on this one, they can just go do it. Nobody is stopping them from handling it. However, if the US doesn't do it, who will they criticize and blame? :ask:

User avatar
Warren Dew
Posts: 3781
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:41 pm
Location: Somerville, MA, USA
Contact:

Re: Syria - will the hawks stay on their perches?

Post by Warren Dew » Thu May 31, 2012 3:56 am

Here's a good article that touches on the subject:

http://us4.campaign-archive1.com/?u=747 ... 660cb708c3

Basically the Arab spring presents us with choices between military dictatorships and Islamic theocracies. Which should we be supporting?

User avatar
Clinton Huxley
19th century monkeybitch.
Posts: 23746
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:34 pm
Contact:

Re: Syria - will the hawks stay on their perches?

Post by Clinton Huxley » Thu May 31, 2012 7:16 am

Next step will be Saudia Arabia and the Gulf states sending arms to the rebels. Maybe Turkey will establish some kind of safe zone. Something might need to be done about the regular Russian freighter carrying arms to Assad though....
"I grow old … I grow old …
I shall wear the bottoms of my trousers rolled"

AND MERRY XMAS TO ONE AND All!

Imagehttp://25kv.co.uk/date_counter.php?date ... 20counting!!![/img-sig]

User avatar
Rum
Absent Minded Processor
Posts: 37285
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
Location: South of the border..though not down Mexico way..
Contact:

Re: Syria - will the hawks stay on their perches?

Post by Rum » Thu May 31, 2012 8:13 am

Cue general regional Sunni/Shi'a conflagration?

I hope not, but it has the potential.

User avatar
Robert_S
Cookie Monster
Posts: 13416
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
Location: Illinois
Contact:

Re: Syria - will the hawks stay on their perches?

Post by Robert_S » Thu May 31, 2012 8:31 am

Clinton Huxley wrote:Next step will be Saudia Arabia and the Gulf states sending arms to the rebels. Maybe Turkey will establish some kind of safe zone. Something might need to be done about the regular Russian freighter carrying arms to Assad though....
We could cut a deal with some Somali pirates? We release some of their prisoners in exchange for them agreeing to use their skills on the Russian freighter and to start dressing like proper pirates.
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P

The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Syria - will the hawks stay on their perches?

Post by Coito ergo sum » Thu May 31, 2012 1:03 pm

Ian wrote:I think it's time for Turkey to go whup some butt.
Image

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Syria - will the hawks stay on their perches?

Post by Coito ergo sum » Thu May 31, 2012 1:06 pm

Warren Dew wrote:Here's a good article that touches on the subject:

http://us4.campaign-archive1.com/?u=747 ... 660cb708c3

Basically the Arab spring presents us with choices between military dictatorships and Islamic theocracies. Which should we be supporting?
I think the most nuanced, and poignant, statement of what we should be doing is supporting the right of the Arab people to the brutal despot of their choice. After all, everyone has a right to be free of democracy and republican governments, and if they choose to live under tyrannical leaders who hold power through fear and force, then who are we to force liberal government and civil and human rights on them...

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Syria - will the hawks stay on their perches?

Post by Coito ergo sum » Thu May 31, 2012 1:09 pm

Robert_S wrote:
Clinton Huxley wrote:Next step will be Saudia Arabia and the Gulf states sending arms to the rebels. Maybe Turkey will establish some kind of safe zone. Something might need to be done about the regular Russian freighter carrying arms to Assad though....
We could cut a deal with some Somali pirates? We release some of their prisoners in exchange for them agreeing to use their skills on the Russian freighter and to start dressing like proper pirates.
The Russians seem to have a "way" of dealing with pirates...

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldne ... -died.html
Somali pirates captured and released by Russian navy 'have died'
A group of Somali pirates captured by the Russian navy in the Gulf of Aden and then set free in a boat are most probably dead after failing to reach the shore, according to Russian defence sources.
Yes, they failed to outrun the bullets chasing after them....

User avatar
Tyrannical
Posts: 6468
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:59 am
Contact:

Re: Syria - will the hawks stay on their perches?

Post by Tyrannical » Thu May 31, 2012 1:24 pm

Hmmmm, brutal secular dictatorship or brutal Islamic dictatorship :thinks:
I think I'll sit this one out :hehe:
A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.

User avatar
Mysturji
Clint Eastwood
Posts: 5005
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 4:08 pm
About me: Downloading an app to my necktop
Location: http://tinyurl.com/c9o35ny
Contact:

Re: Syria - will the hawks stay on their perches?

Post by Mysturji » Thu May 31, 2012 3:40 pm

Ian wrote:I think it's time for Turkey to go whup some butt.
They'll gobble 'em up!
Sir Figg Newton wrote:If I have seen further than others, it is only because I am surrounded by midgets.
Cormac wrote:Doom predictors have been with humans right through our history. They are like the proverbial stopped clock - right twice a day, but not due to the efficacy of their prescience.
IDMD2
I am a twit.

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Syria - will the hawks stay on their perches?

Post by Coito ergo sum » Thu May 31, 2012 4:01 pm

We need to keep abreast of events in the middle east, so that we have a leg up on the Syrians.

I'm still a little peeved, though at this whole "Syria" thing. When did the Assyrians become just the Syrians. Did they lose their Ass?

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests