Post
by maiforpeace » Wed Mar 28, 2012 2:11 am
"Feeding The Homeless BANNED In Major Cities All Over America"
We are a large country with at least 75 major cities, and they name 5 cities? With specific (not all the same) problems?
Talk about a misleading headline.
Did it occur to anybody that a lot of this food is prepared by people who don't know jack shit about food sanitation and safety? It does not take much to poison a food source, and then you feed it to a group of homeless people who get violently ill from it. Most of them won't make to the hospital probably, and then they just die and get written as dead from exposure, whatever, nobody will know. Oh, you need that tooth pulled eh..I'm not a dentist, but let me help you out! I don't know you, and I'll probably never see you again, so what the hell.
It's not as simple as just meaning well and feeding somebody who is hungry.
The UK and Finland are both smaller than California...and therefore a little easier to manage, wouldn't you think? Where's the story about how we take of the homeless here in California?
In Santa Cruz, food banks and restaurants send their 'secondhand' food to a nonprofit type 'broker' and they are the ones who distribute it to the shelters etc, and they are the ones who carry the liability if something happens. Because yes, homeless people have sued before for food poisoning.
I think I'm pretty fair about not being US biased, but sometimes I think these types of stories sound more like sensationalist stuff to make us out as big bad America.