Indeed. When Warren dismissed Nate Silver as a "New York Times writer" it told me all I needed to know about the validity of Warren's opinions.Ian wrote:More to the point, it's FiveThirtyEight.com, Nate Silver's blog, which is now carried on the NYT website.Warren Dew wrote:If you actually read the article you linked to, it's an article in the New York Times, not the PPP. The problematic part isn't so much the PPP polling, but with the New York Times writer's extrapolations.Ian wrote:The PPP is an out of touch leftist source, eh? What paranoia. When you write stuff like this it makes you come across like a charicature of a partisan Republican: if you don't like the information you hear, you assume the source must secretly have a leftist bias. Says more about you than it does about the PPP.
538 is not leftist, and "out of touch" is the absolute last thing I'd ever say about his work. They guy understands polling and electioneering better than anybody around.
If there's anybody you should trust on the numbers, it's Nate Silver. I wouldn't trust Warren's numbers as far as I could throw him.