Or baked in one of those disgusting Sugar Pies they love up there.JimC wrote:He will be boiled alive in maple syrup...
No Dick in Canada
- maiforpeace
- Account Suspended at Member's Request
- Posts: 15726
- Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 1:41 am
- Location: under the redwood trees
Re: No Dick in Canada
Atheists have always argued that this world is all that we have, and that our duty is to one another to make the very most and best of it. ~Christopher Hitchens~
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3534/379 ... 3be9_o.jpg[/imgc]
- Tyrannical
- Posts: 6468
- Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:59 am
- Contact:
Re: No Dick in Canada
I've always thought we should have conquered Canada instead of Mexico. Maybe it is not too late? I've always heard that Canada was occupies by a bunch of cowardly pussies.
Would probably do them some good. Though probably not, it's not easy to cure generations of usefulness.
Would probably do them some good. Though probably not, it's not easy to cure generations of usefulness.
A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.
- tattuchu
- a dickload of cocks
- Posts: 21890
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 2:59 pm
- About me: I'm having trouble with the trolley.
- Location: Marmite-upon-Toast, Wankershire
- Contact:
Re: No Dick in Canada
I was making a joke because that's the only response you're going to get out of me. I have no intention of taking your bait, nor playing your game. We've had this conversation before and you know goddamn well what this scumbag's crimes are. You're being either disingenuous or willfully ignorant in denial. Whatever. If you want a debate, go play with that fucktard Seth. I'm not interested.Coito ergo sum wrote:LOL - exactly the answer I'd expect.tattuchu wrote:Being a Dick.Coito ergo sum wrote:What's the worst one?tattuchu wrote:The same war crimes that everyone else in the entire fucking world without their head up their ass think he's guilty of.Coito ergo sum wrote:What war crimes do the canucks think he is guilty of again?
People who make this allegation tend to not know what they're talking about, and you haven't betrayed that expectation.
People think "queue" is just "q" followed by 4 silent letters.
But those letters are not silent.
They're just waiting their turn.
But those letters are not silent.
They're just waiting their turn.
- tattuchu
- a dickload of cocks
- Posts: 21890
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 2:59 pm
- About me: I'm having trouble with the trolley.
- Location: Marmite-upon-Toast, Wankershire
- Contact:
Re: No Dick in Canada
What a wonderful way to goJimC wrote:He will be boiled alive in maple syrup...
People think "queue" is just "q" followed by 4 silent letters.
But those letters are not silent.
They're just waiting their turn.
But those letters are not silent.
They're just waiting their turn.
- sandinista
- Posts: 2546
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:15 pm
- About me: It’s a plot, but busta can you tell me who’s greedier?
Big corporations, the pigs or the media? - Contact:
Re: No Dick in Canada
That about sums it up.tattuchu wrote:I was making a joke because that's the only response you're going to get out of me. I have no intention of taking your bait, nor playing your game. We've had this conversation before and you know goddamn well what this scumbag's crimes are. You're being either disingenuous or willfully ignorant in denial. Whatever. If you want a debate, go play with that fucktard Seth. I'm not interested.
Our struggle is not against actual corrupt individuals, but against those in power in general, against their authority, against the global order and the ideological mystification which sustains it.
-
Coito ergo sum
- Posts: 32040
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: No Dick in Canada
Is that supposed to be an "oh, snap" quip?maiforpeace wrote:Exactly.sandinista wrote:plus, since he went over to "help" the people you would think they would actually throw a lavish welcome for him. Greeted as a hero!mistermack wrote:He should be made to do a speaking tour of Afghanistan. As he was so keen to send other people there.
If he's so innocent, then traveling to speak in Canada shouldn't be problem then, should it CES.
One, even if he is "guilty" of something, that would not justify vigilante action against him, would it, mai?
Two, nobody here even knows what they think he's guilty of.
Three, even innocent people get accosted, threatened, and even assaulted/battered, without just cause.
Four, similar Leftist folks have no trouble harming or frightening the innocent, as the multitudinous bricks cast through storefront windows during global trade meetings will attest.
- Svartalf
- Offensive Grail Keeper
- Posts: 41249
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: Paris France
- Contact:
Re: No Dick in Canada
Ithought hanged with moose gut... no need to waste that much maple syrup.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
-
Coito ergo sum
- Posts: 32040
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: No Dick in Canada
That the only response because likely it's the only coherent response you can give. It's not a difficult or lengthy answer. "Obama is guilt of war crimes!"tattuchu wrote:I was making a joke because that's the only response you're going to get out of me. I have no intention of taking your bait, nor playing your game. We've had this conversation before and you know goddamn well what this scumbag's crimes are. You're being either disingenuous or willfully ignorant in denial. Whatever. If you want a debate, go play with that fucktard Seth. I'm not interested.Coito ergo sum wrote:LOL - exactly the answer I'd expect.tattuchu wrote:Being a Dick.Coito ergo sum wrote:What's the worst one?tattuchu wrote:
The same war crimes that everyone else in the entire fucking world without their head up their ass think he's guilty of.
People who make this allegation tend to not know what they're talking about, and you haven't betrayed that expectation.
"Oh, yeah? What war crimes?"
"Being a dick."
"Oh, o.k., sounds reasonable."
Look - the reason you have gotten so upset is that you know you don't have a coherent answer. You just want to fling poo.
- Tyrannical
- Posts: 6468
- Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:59 am
- Contact:
Re: No Dick in Canada
Well, the Canadian Bar association should be relived.
What's the daily bag limit on lawyers up in Canada anyways?
What's the daily bag limit on lawyers up in Canada anyways?
A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.
-
Coito ergo sum
- Posts: 32040
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: No Dick in Canada
No limit. They are culling the herds.Tyrannical wrote:Well, the Canadian Bar association should be relived.
What's the daily bag limit on lawyers up in Canada anyways?
- Pappa
- Non-Practicing Anarchist

- Posts: 56488
- Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:42 am
- About me: I am sacrificing a turnip as I type.
- Location: Le sud du Pays de Galles.
- Contact:
Re: No Dick in Canada
Tat, this is a reminder that personal attacks are against the rules.tattuchu wrote:I was making a joke because that's the only response you're going to get out of me. I have no intention of taking your bait, nor playing your game. We've had this conversation before and you know goddamn well what this scumbag's crimes are. You're being either disingenuous or willfully ignorant in denial. Whatever. If you want a debate, go play with that fucktard Seth. I'm not interested.
For information on ways to help support Rationalia financially, see our funding page.
When the aliens do come, everything we once thought was cool will then make us ashamed.
Re: No Dick in Canada
yeah there is a dick in Canada and he's not a Ratz member so I can say it .

Give me the wine , I don't need the bread
- Svartalf
- Offensive Grail Keeper
- Posts: 41249
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: Paris France
- Contact:
Re: No Dick in Canada
No dicks in Canada? how come the wimmins have not moved to areas endowed with adequately virile dwellers?
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
- tattuchu
- a dickload of cocks
- Posts: 21890
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 2:59 pm
- About me: I'm having trouble with the trolley.
- Location: Marmite-upon-Toast, Wankershire
- Contact:
Re: No Dick in Canada
No, actually, my reason is precisely as stated.Coito ergo sum wrote:
Look - the reason you have gotten so upset is that you know you don't have a coherent answer. You just want to fling poo.
No problem. Coito, apologies if I came across as a bit harsh. I like you and have quite a lot of respect for you. Hope you don't think I was being a cunt. Just really not interested in engaging in a debate.Pappa wrote:Tat, this is a reminder that personal attacks are against the rules.tattuchu wrote:I was making a joke because that's the only response you're going to get out of me. I have no intention of taking your bait, nor playing your game. We've had this conversation before and you know goddamn well what this scumbag's crimes are. You're being either disingenuous or willfully ignorant in denial. Whatever. If you want a debate, go play with that fucktard Seth. I'm not interested.
People think "queue" is just "q" followed by 4 silent letters.
But those letters are not silent.
They're just waiting their turn.
But those letters are not silent.
They're just waiting their turn.
-
Coito ergo sum
- Posts: 32040
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: No Dick in Canada
Doubtful. You're dodging.tattuchu wrote:No, actually, my reason is precisely as stated.Coito ergo sum wrote:
Look - the reason you have gotten so upset is that you know you don't have a coherent answer. You just want to fling poo.
I don't think it is me you owe an apology to, since I highly doubt Pappa cautioned you because of anything you said to me. Nothing that you said directed at me was a personal attack, and I did not report the post. If my suspicion is correct, you were cautioned for calling Seth a "fucktard."tattuchu wrote:No problem. Coito, apologies if I came across as a bit harsh. I like you and have quite a lot of respect for you. Hope you don't think I was being a cunt. Just really not interested in engaging in a debate.Pappa wrote:Tat, this is a reminder that personal attacks are against the rules.tattuchu wrote:I was making a joke because that's the only response you're going to get out of me. I have no intention of taking your bait, nor playing your game. We've had this conversation before and you know goddamn well what this scumbag's crimes are. You're being either disingenuous or willfully ignorant in denial. Whatever. If you want a debate, go play with that fucktard Seth. I'm not interested.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 14 guests
