What type of Capitalist / Socialist are you?

[Tyrannical]

Wow loozer, I had no idea you were so misinformed about humans.
Classifying all humans as one subspecies is purely a Christian religious doctronice originating from God creating man.
Intelligent people should know better

[Warren Dew]

Our Founding Fathers: I believe that a strong moral faith in Christianity, racial homogeneity, free trade and a reliance on personal responsibility leads to a safer, wealthier, and more morally just society.

So does that make you in favor of maximizing interracial marriages so we can homogenize the races and achieve "racial homogeneity" as quickly as possible?

No, I am against race mixing.
But you already knew that I'm sure. Perhaps you were just trying to get my goat, or should I say my Liger

Mostly I was pulling your chain, yes. However, it does seem that there are some benefits in terms of societal cohesion to racial and cultural homogeneity; that's part of the reason why some things that work in relatively homogeneous states in northern Europe don't work in the U.S. And I really do think that the only realistic route to racial homogeneity in the U.S., if that's what one wants, is a few generations of thorough mixing.

Much as you might like to believe it would be better to send the African Americans back to Africa, the Asian Americans back to Asia, and the European Americans back to Europe, that's really not realistic from a practical standpoint.

Now I know you are in a mixed race relationship, and I don't want to criticize you or your family since I'm not quite so mean as I'm made out to be. But I'm sure there are Asians in your (in-law) family tree that also disproves on racial grounds.

I guess I'm in a mixed race relationship, but that's only because I'm mixed race myself!

[JimC]

Interesting set of choices. I am a hybrid of a number of the socialist options, mellowed over the last thirty years from being a pretty heavy duty socialist worker type, man the barricades and all that, to someone who hates to see the rich exploiting the poor and getting away with it. So to me fairness and justice are important as are the values associated with compassion for one's fellow human beings.

Probably a mixture of them as well but I will settle with whatever version Seth thinks is the most evil

Always a wise choice...

[Lozzer]

Wow loozer, I had no idea you were so misinformed about humans.
Classifying all humans as one subspecies is purely a Christian religious doctronice originating from God creating man.
Intelligent people should know better

We aren't a 'subspecies', we're a species.

This is basic biology, dude. It has nothing to do with 'Christianity'

[Svartalf]

Actually, what's worse, non Africans are hybrids of two or three subspecies, two of them extinct.

[Lozzer]

Actually, what's worse, non Africans are hybrids of two or three subspecies, two of them extinct.

We're not significantly interbred with Neanderthals, though. It's thought that our ancestors didn't 'interbreed' with other human populations in Europe so much as they replaced them, entirely.

[Svartalf]

Well, we still do have DNA that we don't share with African populations and that has also been found in Neandertal remains... what do you make of that?
Oh, I forgot, you don't, because you're pure Piltdown man

[Lozzer]

Well, we still do have DNA that we don't share with African populations and that has also been found in Neandertal remains... what do you make of that?
Oh, I forgot, you don't, because you're pure Piltdown man

As I said, we didn't merge together as Multi-regional model would suggest. We had a shag here and there, but for the most part, we emigrated from Africa and replaced other 'human' populations throughout Europe

[Drewish]

Wow loozer, I had no idea you were so misinformed about humans.
Classifying all humans as one subspecies is purely a Christian religious doctronice originating from God creating man.
Intelligent people should know better

Oh no, I'm agreeing with Tyrannical. This could be bad.

[Drewish]

So thus far there are 5 people who have answered the poll, with whom it's completely pointless to discuss issues of ethics and economics (Anyone who answered with the last two answers is a lost cause.)

[laklak]

Well, I believe that babies should be sold to the highest bidder, on the open market. Perhaps set up a display next to the bluefin tuna. But I also believe that all women should be encouraged, in the spirit of communal solidarity, to shag me. So I guess I'm for a mixed economy, neh?

[Drewish]

Well, I believe that babies should be sold to the highest bidder, on the open market. Perhaps set up a display next to the bluefin tuna. But I also believe that all women should be encouraged, in the spirit of communal solidarity, to shag me. So I guess I'm for a mixed economy, neh?

But that will just have the effect of reducing the $ you can get for your offspring by flooding the market!

[laklak]

Ah, but if I knock them up then no one else can. It's a zero-sum game.

[PsychoSerenity]

So thus far there are 5 people who have answered the poll, with whom it's completely pointless to discuss issues of ethics and economics (Anyone who answered with the last two answers is a lost cause.)

How so? I think you may be thinking something that didn't come across clearly in the different options you created. A few people have said that they're a mixture of several options. I don't think you can write people off because their world view best approximates, out of limited options, to something you've summed up in a couple of words. Those words will have different meanings to different people.

[Drewish]

So thus far there are 5 people who have answered the poll, with whom it's completely pointless to discuss issues of ethics and economics (Anyone who answered with the last two answers is a lost cause.)

How so? I think you may be thinking something that didn't come across clearly in the different options you created. A few people have said that they're a mixture of several options. I don't think you can write people off because their world view best approximates, out of limited options, to something you've summed up in a couple of words. Those words will have different meanings to different people.

If Freedom or equality is more important than justice to an individual, then I have no grounds upon which to have a discussion with them. If one of the last two options are the best fit for somebody then they are a brainwashed dip shit who isn't worth my time. FACT.