You can't travel faster than light after all - phew!

User avatar
Ronja
Just Another Safety Nut
Posts: 10920
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 8:13 pm
About me: mother of 2 girls, married to fellow rat MiM, student (SW, HCI, ICT...) , self-employed editor/proofreader/translator
Location: Helsinki, Finland, EU
Contact:

Re: You can't travel faster than light after all - phew!

Post by Ronja » Thu Feb 23, 2012 5:05 pm

It said "Yes."

User avatar
Audley Strange
"I blame the victim"
Posts: 7485
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: You can't travel faster than light after all - phew!

Post by Audley Strange » Thu Feb 23, 2012 5:15 pm

Hmm. It appears to be infectious. We may have to quarantine this thread.
"What started as a legitimate effort by the townspeople of Salem to identify, capture and kill those who did Satan's bidding quickly deteriorated into a witch hunt" Army Man

User avatar
Rum
Absent Minded Processor
Posts: 37285
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
Location: South of the border..though not down Mexico way..
Contact:

Re: You can't travel faster than light after all - phew!

Post by Rum » Thu Feb 23, 2012 5:46 pm

Audley Strange wrote:
Rum wrote:Never happen. I used to think it might one day but its too big an ask.

We may just get to Mars with humans, but even that is tougher than we ever thought it would be.
"too big an ask?" What are you a fucking retarded Australian baby?

Sorry you're getting the brunt of it Rum, but I'm fucking sick of Oz speak proliferating through the Beeb and then fucking public outside using it without thinking. Control your diction!!!
They're putting words in your mouth.

While I'm at it. Sea change does NOT mean a quick change overnight, it means the fucking opposite, a gradual almost un-noticable change.

AAAAAAAAAAAAaAAARGH!!!!!


*Jumps out of window*
I have always admired your moderate quiet tone. :roll:

Its not Oz speak actually but it is lazy speak I will grant you that.

User avatar
Audley Strange
"I blame the victim"
Posts: 7485
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: You can't travel faster than light after all - phew!

Post by Audley Strange » Thu Feb 23, 2012 6:10 pm

Rum wrote:
Audley Strange wrote:
Rum wrote:Never happen. I used to think it might one day but its too big an ask.

We may just get to Mars with humans, but even that is tougher than we ever thought it would be.
"too big an ask?" What are you a fucking retarded Australian baby?

Sorry you're getting the brunt of it Rum, but I'm fucking sick of Oz speak proliferating through the Beeb and then fucking public outside using it without thinking. Control your diction!!!
They're putting words in your mouth.

While I'm at it. Sea change does NOT mean a quick change overnight, it means the fucking opposite, a gradual almost un-noticable change.

AAAAAAAAAAAAaAAARGH!!!!!


*Jumps out of window*
I have always admired your moderate quiet tone. :roll:

Its not Oz speak actually but it is lazy speak I will grant you that.
Rum, I was half joking half venting and as I said you got the brunt of it. This however is not an excuse.

Sincerely, my apologies for insulting you unnecessarily.
"What started as a legitimate effort by the townspeople of Salem to identify, capture and kill those who did Satan's bidding quickly deteriorated into a witch hunt" Army Man

User avatar
Rum
Absent Minded Processor
Posts: 37285
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
Location: South of the border..though not down Mexico way..
Contact:

Re: You can't travel faster than light after all - phew!

Post by Rum » Thu Feb 23, 2012 6:26 pm

No need but thanks anyway. :tup:

User avatar
Xamonas Chegwé
Bouncer
Bouncer
Posts: 50939
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:23 pm
About me: I have prehensile eyebrows.
I speak 9 languages fluently, one of which other people can also speak.
When backed into a corner, I fit perfectly - having a right-angled arse.
Location: Nottingham UK
Contact:

Re: You can't travel faster than light after all - phew!

Post by Xamonas Chegwé » Thu Feb 23, 2012 6:28 pm

He's not late... he just got his fibre-optic cables crossed. :tea:
A book is a version of the world. If you do not like it, ignore it; or offer your own version in return.
Salman Rushdie
You talk to God, you're religious. God talks to you, you're psychotic.
House MD
Who needs a meaning anyway, I'd settle anyday for a very fine view.
Sandy Denny
This is the wrong forum for bluffing :nono:
Paco
Yes, yes. But first I need to show you this venomous fish!
Calilasseia
I think we should do whatever Pawiz wants.
Twoflower
Bella squats momentarily then waddles on still peeing, like a horse
Millefleur

User avatar
JacksSmirkingRevenge
Grand Wazoo
Posts: 13516
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 6:56 pm
About me: Half man - half yak.
Location: Perfidious Albion
Contact:

Re: You can't travel faster than light after all - phew!

Post by JacksSmirkingRevenge » Thu Feb 23, 2012 9:27 pm

Just caught this same story earlier.
I have to admit that I'm a little disappointed.
Sent from my Interositor using Twatatalk.

User avatar
Horwood Beer-Master
"...a complete Kentish hog"
Posts: 7061
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 2:34 pm
Location: Wandering somewhere around the Darenth Valley - Kent
Contact:

Re: You can't travel faster than light after all - phew!

Post by Horwood Beer-Master » Fri Feb 24, 2012 7:26 am

Rum wrote:Never happen. I used to think it might one day but its too big an ask.

We may just get to Mars with humans, but even that is tougher than we ever thought it would be.
It's tough mostly because we've gone and convinced ourselves it is. How can you say something's tough when you've scarcely really made any effort towards it?

As Neil deGrasse Tyson pointed out, the amount of money spent bailing-out the banks a few years back was far in excess of Nasa's entire budget since it's creation - and that includes within it the cost of the moon-landings.


By far the biggest challenge that faces human exploration of space today is the public perception of how costly and difficult it is. In reality I'm sure that if, say, Nasa, Esa, Roscosmos and maybe a few others got together and made the effort we could plant a colony on Mars within 30 years, for a cost that frankly, even in these times of cuts, would be lost against the general white nose of crap we spend money on.
Image

User avatar
Rum
Absent Minded Processor
Posts: 37285
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
Location: South of the border..though not down Mexico way..
Contact:

Re: You can't travel faster than light after all - phew!

Post by Rum » Fri Feb 24, 2012 8:51 am

Horwood Beer-Master wrote:
Rum wrote:Never happen. I used to think it might one day but its too big an ask.

We may just get to Mars with humans, but even that is tougher than we ever thought it would be.
It's tough mostly because we've gone and convinced ourselves it is. How can you say something's tough when you've scarcely really made any effort towards it?

As Neil deGrasse Tyson pointed out, the amount of money spent bailing-out the banks a few years back was far in excess of Nasa's entire budget since it's creation - and that includes within it the cost of the moon-landings.


By far the biggest challenge that faces human exploration of space today is the public perception of how costly and difficult it is. In reality I'm sure that if, say, Nasa, Esa, Roscosmos and maybe a few others got together and made the effort we could plant a colony on Mars within 30 years, for a cost that frankly, even in these times of cuts, would be lost against the general white nose of crap we spend money on.
I'm sure you are right about public perception, but political action need a willing population to at least tolerate its adventures. The American public were 100% more or less behind the moon landings because the time was right - and the politics of the Cold War made it a damn good proxy to lobbing missiles about the place.

However the size of the task and its sheer cost remain a massive barrier. A manned mission to Mars would cost a minimum of half a trillion US dollars according to stuff I have read. It isn't actually a massive proportion of the USA budget (or a few other big countries) but I simply don't see any politician brave enough to try to get his/her population behind that sort of semi-speculative spending when there are so many issues here.

How about half a trillion going into fusion power research for example?

User avatar
Horwood Beer-Master
"...a complete Kentish hog"
Posts: 7061
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 2:34 pm
Location: Wandering somewhere around the Darenth Valley - Kent
Contact:

Re: You can't travel faster than light after all - phew!

Post by Horwood Beer-Master » Fri Feb 24, 2012 4:26 pm

Rum wrote:
Horwood Beer-Master wrote:
Rum wrote:Never happen. I used to think it might one day but its too big an ask.

We may just get to Mars with humans, but even that is tougher than we ever thought it would be.
It's tough mostly because we've gone and convinced ourselves it is. How can you say something's tough when you've scarcely really made any effort towards it?

As Neil deGrasse Tyson pointed out, the amount of money spent bailing-out the banks a few years back was far in excess of Nasa's entire budget since it's creation - and that includes within it the cost of the moon-landings.


By far the biggest challenge that faces human exploration of space today is the public perception of how costly and difficult it is. In reality I'm sure that if, say, Nasa, Esa, Roscosmos and maybe a few others got together and made the effort we could plant a colony on Mars within 30 years, for a cost that frankly, even in these times of cuts, would be lost against the general white nose of crap we spend money on.
I'm sure you are right about public perception, but political action need a willing population to at least tolerate its adventures. The American public were 100% more or less behind the moon landings because the time was right - and the politics of the Cold War made it a damn good proxy to lobbing missiles about the place.

However the size of the task and its sheer cost remain a massive barrier. A manned mission to Mars would cost a minimum of half a trillion US dollars according to stuff I have read. It isn't actually a massive proportion of the USA budget (or a few other big countries) but I simply don't see any politician brave enough to try to get his/her population behind that sort of semi-speculative spending when there are so many issues here.

How about half a trillion going into fusion power research for example?
Makes me wonder if there's ways of 'hiding' parts of the cost for such an enterprise, so that the apparent government spend is far lower than the actual government spend.
Politicians are normally so good at this kind of thing when it comes to the funding of useless genuinely wasteful projects designed to line their mate's pockets, so why not apply those skills to something actually important for once?

Maybe what we need are more politicians with mates working in/on space exploration. Of course to do that we first need to free up some vacancies...


...anyone happen to have a sniper rifle handy? :ask: :plot: :shifty:
Image

User avatar
mistermack
Posts: 15093
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:57 am
About me: Never rong.
Contact:

Re: You can't travel faster than light after all - phew!

Post by mistermack » Fri Feb 24, 2012 4:26 pm

Horwood Beer-Master wrote:....... we could plant a colony on Mars within 30 years, for a cost that frankly, even in these times of cuts, would be lost against the general white nose of crap we spend money on.
We could certainly do that, and would, if there was a point to it. But what would be the point?
Apart from curiosity, Mars has little to give.
The Moon is much closer, and far easier to travel to.
Mars projects now would just be a silly waste of money.
While there is a market for shit, there will be assholes to supply it.

User avatar
Hermit
Posts: 25806
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
About me: Cantankerous grump
Location: Ignore lithpt
Contact:

Re: You can't travel faster than light after all - phew!

Post by Hermit » Fri Feb 24, 2012 10:41 pm

Rum wrote:Never happen. I used to think it might one day but its too big an ask.
Yes, and heavier than air flying machines will never happen.

We are notoriously unreliable when we try to predict what can happen and what can't. Even geniuses get it spectacularly wrong. Look at Tesla. We are constantly surprised by developments we simply did not anticipate. The Great Horse Manure Crisis of 1894 was a delicious example of that.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould

User avatar
klr
(%gibber(who=klr, what=Leprageek);)
Posts: 32964
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 1:25 pm
About me: The money was just resting in my account.
Location: Airstrip Two
Contact:

Re: You can't travel faster than light after all - phew!

Post by klr » Fri Feb 24, 2012 10:56 pm

We're currently living through one of the greatest social upheavals in history, all caused by computing, communication and related technologies. I certainly didn't see it coming twenty years ago, and I work in IT.

But all the same, I'm not holding my breath about us going to Mars any time soon, even though I've been waiting for it almost my entire life.
God has no place within these walls, just like facts have no place within organized religion. - Superintendent Chalmers

It's not up to us to choose which laws we want to obey. If it were, I'd kill everyone who looked at me cock-eyed! - Rex Banner

The Bluebird of Happiness long absent from his life, Ned is visited by the Chicken of Depression. - Gary Larson

:mob: :comp: :mob:

PsychoSerenity
"I" Self-Perceive Recursively
Posts: 7824
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:57 am
Contact:

Re: You can't travel faster than light after all - phew!

Post by PsychoSerenity » Fri Feb 24, 2012 11:00 pm

Seraph wrote:The Great Horse Manure Crisis of 1894
:coffeespray:
That was a real thing?!

But yeah, I certainly wouldn't rule out faster than light becoming a possibility eventually. It's just well out of our grasp to conceive how at the moment. Maybe that is just my inner-sci-fi-fan talking, but science and technology, knowledge and understanding, seem to be changing pretty much exponentially - it's sometimes hard not to be optimistic.
[Disclaimer - if this is comes across like I think I know what I'm talking about, I want to make it clear that I don't. I'm just trying to get my thoughts down]

User avatar
Hermit
Posts: 25806
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
About me: Cantankerous grump
Location: Ignore lithpt
Contact:

Re: You can't travel faster than light after all - phew!

Post by Hermit » Sat Feb 25, 2012 12:18 am

Psychoserenity wrote:
Seraph wrote:The Great Horse Manure Crisis of 1894
:coffeespray:
That was a real thing?!
Yes, it was. When I first heard of this, I thought it was a cute fable serving as a vehicle for right-wing, free market sermonisers, but it was dealt with at length as part of a 600 or 900 page book about the history of New York. If it turned out to be bogus, someone would have comprehensively and decisively debunked it by now. Unfortunately I never bookmarked the link to the book, but the sermon can be found here.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests