
(however, I actually like watching sausages being made, as well as eating them when BBQ'd...)
I was blindsided by Santorum. Why? WHY????!!!maiforpeace wrote:Santorum and Romney are tied.
No worries, his campaign will be history in a few weeks.Coito ergo sum wrote:I was blindsided by Santorum. Why? WHY????!!!maiforpeace wrote:Santorum and Romney are tied.
I oppose him strenuously.
Look out for Jon Huntsman in New Hampshire. He's been spending his whole campaign there, and if he can take New Hampshire, then he may have a chance to get in the mix.Ian wrote:Wow, totally neck-and-neck.
The nominee will be Romney. The process stories over the next few days will discuss the reasons for Santorum's surprise surge - namely, that he's a repressive Christian jerk who spent all his time in Iowa and appealed to the evangelicals there. He's the New Huckabee. And in a couple weeks he'll be absolutely demolished in New Hampshire, where his sort of social conservatism doesn't fit at all well with the New England crowd; he might, however, stick it out as far as South Carolina. Romney should take NH in a walk (though Ron Paul may pull a surprisingly strong showing in this quirky state), and he'll have the money and organization to keep going. Perry is destined to drop out (probably no later than after NH, if not after Super Tuesday), as is Bachmann (probably within days). Huntsman - he's like the anti-Santorum, so he's ignoring Iowa and focusing on New Hampshire. But he can't last too long after that. He's only running for name recognition for 2016, IMO. Gingrich, I think, will keep fighting and get a few surprise showings here and there in other states, but he won't end up with the nomination. Ditto Ron Paul - except that he's the Wild Card. He won't get the nomination, surely knows it, but he also isn't running for Congress again. This election is his last hurrah, and he might pull a Nader and run as a 3rd party candidate.
Do you mean grilled? Or, do you actually barbecue sausages...?JimC wrote:I like the wit of the thread title...
(however, I actually like watching sausages being made, as well as eating them when BBQ'd...)
The media isn't interested firstly because GOP primary voters aren't interested. As a result, he gets little continual media exposure. He'll get some more after New Hampshire, assuming he comes in the top three (and that's a big if), but he won't survive places like South Carolina and Florida (too expensive to campaign there, even if it's not quite as conservative as other states).Coito ergo sum wrote:Look out for Jon Huntsman in New Hampshire. He's been spending his whole campaign there, and if he can take New Hampshire, then he may have a chance to get in the mix.Ian wrote:Wow, totally neck-and-neck.
The nominee will be Romney. The process stories over the next few days will discuss the reasons for Santorum's surprise surge - namely, that he's a repressive Christian jerk who spent all his time in Iowa and appealed to the evangelicals there. He's the New Huckabee. And in a couple weeks he'll be absolutely demolished in New Hampshire, where his sort of social conservatism doesn't fit at all well with the New England crowd; he might, however, stick it out as far as South Carolina. Romney should take NH in a walk (though Ron Paul may pull a surprisingly strong showing in this quirky state), and he'll have the money and organization to keep going. Perry is destined to drop out (probably no later than after NH, if not after Super Tuesday), as is Bachmann (probably within days). Huntsman - he's like the anti-Santorum, so he's ignoring Iowa and focusing on New Hampshire. But he can't last too long after that. He's only running for name recognition for 2016, IMO. Gingrich, I think, will keep fighting and get a few surprise showings here and there in other states, but he won't end up with the nomination. Ditto Ron Paul - except that he's the Wild Card. He won't get the nomination, surely knows it, but he also isn't running for Congress again. This election is his last hurrah, and he might pull a Nader and run as a 3rd party candidate.
If fucking Santorum can come out of nowhere in Iowa, then Huntsman can do the same in NH.
It's not likely, but it is possible. And, Huntsman is my favorite of the GOP lineup. Accomplished. Intelligent. Pro-science. And, ecumenical in terms of religiosity. Two adopted children, in addition to a bunch of biologicals, one from China and one from India. Successful businessman. Popular governor. Ambassador and trade representative, and diplomat, with 30 years of active experience.
He is the most qualified GOP candidate, bar none. For some reason, the media isn't interested.
Callan wrote:I was aghast to learn, during the small hours of this morning, that Mitt is actually his real (middle) name.
There is something profoundly disturbing about hearing a room full of eager voters all chanting "Mitt! Mitt! Mitt!" like a horde of zombies.
Though not quite as scary as the - er - mitt spewing out of his mouth...
I don't know. NH is sort of its own animal. It's State motto is "Live Free, Or Die." It has a cultural tradition of self-sufficiency. They are less religious than Americans at-large, and are less likely than other Americans to attend weekly services and only 54% say that they are "absolutely certain there is a God" compared to 71% in the rest of the nation. Thirty-six percent said religion is very important to them (56% nationally). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Hampshire#DemographicsSvartalf wrote:Doesn't Romeney, as a Mass guy, have home turf advantage in NH?
What's wrong with them chanting his name? Don't supporters do that at rallies all over?Callan wrote:I was aghast to learn, during the small hours of this morning, that Mitt is actually his real (middle) name.
There is something profoundly disturbing about hearing a room full of eager voters all chanting "Mitt! Mitt! Mitt!" like a horde of zombies.
Though not quite as scary as the - er - mitt spewing out of his mouth...
And you have to admit, that name fits him like a glove.Coito ergo sum wrote:What's wrong with them chanting his name? Don't supporters do that at rallies all over?Callan wrote:I was aghast to learn, during the small hours of this morning, that Mitt is actually his real (middle) name.
There is something profoundly disturbing about hearing a room full of eager voters all chanting "Mitt! Mitt! Mitt!" like a horde of zombies.
Though not quite as scary as the - er - mitt spewing out of his mouth...
What was it that he was saying that you felt was "mitt" specifically? Any prime examples?
I think you're just smitten...Gawdzilla wrote:And you have to admit, that name fits him like a glove.Coito ergo sum wrote:What's wrong with them chanting his name? Don't supporters do that at rallies all over?Callan wrote:I was aghast to learn, during the small hours of this morning, that Mitt is actually his real (middle) name.
There is something profoundly disturbing about hearing a room full of eager voters all chanting "Mitt! Mitt! Mitt!" like a horde of zombies.
Though not quite as scary as the - er - mitt spewing out of his mouth...
What was it that he was saying that you felt was "mitt" specifically? Any prime examples?
Balls.Coito ergo sum wrote:I think you're just smitten...Gawdzilla wrote:And you have to admit, that name fits him like a glove.Coito ergo sum wrote:What's wrong with them chanting his name? Don't supporters do that at rallies all over?Callan wrote:I was aghast to learn, during the small hours of this morning, that Mitt is actually his real (middle) name.
There is something profoundly disturbing about hearing a room full of eager voters all chanting "Mitt! Mitt! Mitt!" like a horde of zombies.
Though not quite as scary as the - er - mitt spewing out of his mouth...
What was it that he was saying that you felt was "mitt" specifically? Any prime examples?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests