They are good for chuckles, though.klr wrote: Conspiracy theories?

They are good for chuckles, though.klr wrote: Conspiracy theories?
JAPANCoito ergo sum wrote:I've always found the conspiracy theories about how FDR purposefully got us into the war belied by the mere fact of our severe state of weakness and lack of readiness to fight anybody in 1941. We had a lot of gearing up to do. That Japanese general had it right when he said the US was a sleeping giant. Most people focus on the "giant" part, but in 1940 and 1941, the operative term was "sleeping."Gawdzilla wrote:FDR wanted to fight the Nazis. The Pacific War was a distraction from that. The US did respect the Japanese military.
Ah yes, the RN flattops came to the rescue. Without them the >110 flight decks the USN had in the Pacific at the end of the war were helpless. Well done, that Navy!Clinton Huxley wrote:Of course, it was the British Pacific Fleet that really finished Japan off...with some help from the 'Mericans.
It was completely unnecessary that the US even contribute. In fact, we probably extended the war due to our meddling. Britain had them wrapped up in 1941, until the Yanks had to come in and steal the credit by prolonging the war for four years.Clinton Huxley wrote:Of course, it was the British Pacific Fleet that really finished Japan off...with some help from the 'Mericans.
How else could MacArthur have risen to Shogun?Coito ergo sum wrote:It was completely unnecessary that the US even contribute. In fact, we probably extended the war due to our meddling. Britain had them wrapped up in 1941, until the Yanks had to come in and steal the credit by prolonging the war for four years.Clinton Huxley wrote:Of course, it was the British Pacific Fleet that really finished Japan off...with some help from the 'Mericans.
From "The Dresden Files"?amused wrote:"I love the smell of Europe burning in the morning."
And, it's obvious it was the Brits who did all the defeating of the Japanese, since the Japanese surrender papers were signed aboard the HMS Missouri.Gawdzilla wrote:How else could MacArthur have risen to Shogun?Coito ergo sum wrote:It was completely unnecessary that the US even contribute. In fact, we probably extended the war due to our meddling. Britain had them wrapped up in 1941, until the Yanks had to come in and steal the credit by prolonging the war for four years.Clinton Huxley wrote:Of course, it was the British Pacific Fleet that really finished Japan off...with some help from the 'Mericans.
Coito ergo sum wrote:And, it's obvious it was the Brits who did all the defeating of the Japanese, since the Japanese surrender papers were signed aboard the HMS Missouri.Gawdzilla wrote:How else could MacArthur have risen to Shogun?Coito ergo sum wrote:It was completely unnecessary that the US even contribute. In fact, we probably extended the war due to our meddling. Britain had them wrapped up in 1941, until the Yanks had to come in and steal the credit by prolonging the war for four years.Clinton Huxley wrote:Of course, it was the British Pacific Fleet that really finished Japan off...with some help from the 'Mericans.
"...anyone who says it’s “just the Internet” can. And then when they come back, they can
again." - Tigger
The RN boats were just a teensy bit harder to damage, or even sink.Gawdzilla wrote:Ah yes, the RN flattops came to the rescue. Without them the >110 flight decks the USN had in the Pacific at the end of the war were helpless. Well done, that Navy!Clinton Huxley wrote:Of course, it was the British Pacific Fleet that really finished Japan off...with some help from the 'Mericans.
"... The U.S.N liaison officer on HMS Indefatigable commented: "When a kamikaze hits a U.S. carrier it means 6 months of repair at Pearl [Harbor]. When a kamikaze hits a Limey carrier it’s just a case of "Sweepers, man your brooms."
Oh boy, here we go again. If Yorktown had had a armored flight deck she wouldn't have made it to Point Luck. Thing would have gone differently in the Pacific for a good while. So both systems have their pluses and minuses. The RN ships couldn't carry as many planes, for example, and the most armor was to be found around the tea pots anyway.klr wrote:The RN boats were just a teensy bit harder to damage, or even sink.Gawdzilla wrote:Ah yes, the RN flattops came to the rescue. Without them the >110 flight decks the USN had in the Pacific at the end of the war were helpless. Well done, that Navy!Clinton Huxley wrote:Of course, it was the British Pacific Fleet that really finished Japan off...with some help from the 'Mericans.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armoured_f ... k#Defences
"... The U.S.N liaison officer on HMS Indefatigable commented: "When a kamikaze hits a U.S. carrier it means 6 months of repair at Pearl [Harbor]. When a kamikaze hits a Limey carrier it’s just a case of "Sweepers, man your brooms."
Oh, I agree completely, and the article discusses the pros and cons of each in great detail. It's one of the better wikipedia articles IMHO.Gawdzilla wrote: ...
Oh boy, here we go again. If Yorktown had had a armored flight deck she wouldn't have made it to Point Luck. Thing would have gone differently in the Pacific for a good while. So both systems have their pluses and minuses. The RN ships couldn't carry as many planes, for example, and the most armor was to be found around the tea pots anyway.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 26 guests