Really/ They're usually a scum role where I come from.MattShizzle wrote:Yeah, bus drivers are usually a town role.
Venture Bros: day 1
Moderator: Mafia Mods
Re: Venture Bros: day 1
Nobody expects me...
-
- not too sweet to sledge
- Posts: 4088
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 2:03 am
- Contact:
Venture Bros: day 1
Gib you're looking a bit scummy there, buddy. And I see the subsequent post you did, also just floating along with whatever is proposed.gib wrote:andrew - good point about DP
tell me why you think MZ is a good candidate
Re: Venture Bros: day 1
Are you claiming MZ deleted a post?irretating wrote:You had to actually remove the post I quoted, that put my words in context. How scummy is that.Magicziggy wrote:Re^^How else would you have me interpret this then?irretating wrote:
That game was weird, I've never seen so many scum push a mayor BW like that.
I'm gonna @@vote irre@@
I'm not going to play into your hands, where people might think this is town-on-town bickering. I'm town, but I don't think you are.
~Three of a Perfect Pair~
-
- not too sweet to sledge
- Posts: 4088
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 2:03 am
- Contact:
Venture Bros: day 1
I'm tapatalking but IIRC feck did a post saying MZ's posts laying out his thinking did not seem like it was coming from a town perspective. Keep it in mind as a possible early purchase of town creds
Re: Venture Bros: day 1
I GMed a game with a Scum busdriver here one time, and that was afaik the only scum busdriver I had ever seen in any game.andrewclunn wrote:Really/ They're usually a scum role where I come from.MattShizzle wrote:Yeah, bus drivers are usually a town role.
It's possible, iow, but unlikely.
~Three of a Perfect Pair~
-
- not too sweet to sledge
- Posts: 4088
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 2:03 am
- Contact:
Venture Bros: day 1
No I'm saying he quote mined me. My post was in response to, and quoted, the post from Andrew. But it served his purposes better to remove the context.Zigmen wrote:Are you claiming MZ deleted a post?irretating wrote:You had to actually remove the post I quoted, that put my words in context. How scummy is that.Magicziggy wrote:Re^^How else would you have me interpret this then?irretating wrote:
That game was weird, I've never seen so many scum push a mayor BW like that.
I'm gonna @@vote irre@@
I'm not going to play into your hands, where people might think this is town-on-town bickering. I'm town, but I don't think you are.
- Uselesstwit
- Posts: 2290
- Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 1:32 am
- Contact:
Re: Venture Bros: day 1
well in fairness i'm not making any effort to appear not scummy but it's interesting that you're getting revengeyirretating wrote:Gib you're looking a bit scummy there, buddy. And I see the subsequent post you did, also just floating along with whatever is proposed.gib wrote:andrew - good point about DP
tell me why you think MZ is a good candidate
which post is the floating along one?
Re: Venture Bros: day 1
you pretty happy with your vote on MZ?Zigmen wrote:I GMed a game with a Scum busdriver here one time, and that was afaik the only scum busdriver I had ever seen in any game.andrewclunn wrote:Really/ They're usually a scum role where I come from.MattShizzle wrote:Yeah, bus drivers are usually a town role.
It's possible, iow, but unlikely.
-
- not too sweet to sledge
- Posts: 4088
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 2:03 am
- Contact:
Venture Bros: day 1
yeahUselesstwit wrote:insomnia irre?

Re: Venture Bros: day 1
I am. I was all set to pull my vote off her this morning after thinking it was Way too ballsy for her to claim the same character as another player (and nobody had pointed out the duplications in the OP nor the "clone" flavor at the point I went to sleep).gib wrote:you pretty happy with your vote on MZ?Zigmen wrote:I GMed a game with a Scum busdriver here one time, and that was afaik the only scum busdriver I had ever seen in any game.andrewclunn wrote:Really/ They're usually a scum role where I come from.MattShizzle wrote:Yeah, bus drivers are usually a town role.
It's possible, iow, but unlikely.
But then I read Andrew's post from about 5 pages ago where he made the case that MZ looked like she had a plan that backfired and how ready she was the vote Shizz as soon as suspicion landed on her.
So I'm now thinking that MZ (or somebody on her team) caught the duplication thing from the OP, knew a bit about the "cloning" flavor, and decided to pull a somewhat risky claim out of the hat, or that Scum was given the same claim as a safe-claim.
Either way, I can't figure out any scenario where MZ could possibly be Town, know what she claims to know about the supposed similarity of the role PMs, and then throw her vote on Shizz.
~Three of a Perfect Pair~
Re: Venture Bros: day 1
andrewclunn wrote:He stated that he has reason to trust here:gib wrote:andrew - good point about DP
tell me why you think MZ is a good candidate
Then there's this once it looks like it's him or Matt:Magicziggy wrote:I have good reason to believe Matt.
I have good reason to believe this is one weird arse game.
Sounds like scum trying to use a townie with the same role to give their claim legitimacy, then when that plan fails, to throw them under the bus.Magicziggy wrote:Now I have reason to lynch you.MattShizzle wrote:To reiterate if MZ was scum he'd be dumb to claim the same as me as once I was lynched and my role confirmed he'd be lynched - and 1 scum for 1 VT is good for town. I would almost say we should both be lynched but I wonder about weird roles. Town should still consider lynching both of us...
##vote Mattshizzle##
This post.
~Three of a Perfect Pair~
-
- not too sweet to sledge
- Posts: 4088
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 2:03 am
- Contact:
Venture Bros: day 1
Zig, MZ is a he.
My case on him relates to his acceptance if the shizz claim without checking the OP or PG to see that yes there could be multiple hanks. Then to suddenly turn on shizz at the very point he should have been OK with him. Then to make out that MY response to the situation was the off one.
My case on him relates to his acceptance if the shizz claim without checking the OP or PG to see that yes there could be multiple hanks. Then to suddenly turn on shizz at the very point he should have been OK with him. Then to make out that MY response to the situation was the off one.
-
- not too sweet to sledge
- Posts: 4088
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 2:03 am
- Contact:
Venture Bros: day 1
*of the shizz claim
Damn auto correct
Damn auto correct
-
- not too sweet to sledge
- Posts: 4088
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 2:03 am
- Contact:
Venture Bros: day 1
the one I quoted plus the one I noted you made about charlougib wrote:well in fairness i'm not making any effort to appear not scummy but it's interesting that you're getting revengeyirretating wrote:Gib you're looking a bit scummy there, buddy. And I see the subsequent post you did, also just floating along with whatever is proposed.gib wrote:andrew - good point about DP
tell me why you think MZ is a good candidate
which post is the floating along one?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests