Strauss-Kahn Set Up?

Post by **Schneibster** » Wed Nov 30, 2011 5:46 am

Warren Dew wrote:All too happy to jump in with unsubstantiated allegations against a rich black man, but when it comes to a rich white man, the charges must have been trumped up, eh, Schneibster?

Maybe you weren't watching the ECB.

Identify the black people on the board of the ECB.

Identify the US citizens on the board of the ECB.

Post by **Schneibster** » Wed Nov 30, 2011 5:49 am

I call George W. Bush "Shrub." Am I prejudiced against White people?

Just askin'.

Post by **Svartalf** » Wed Nov 30, 2011 5:50 am

You are disparaging short growing plants.

Post by **Warren Dew** » Wed Nov 30, 2011 5:56 am

Svartalf wrote:what's that about?

Check out Schneibster's "guilty until proven innocent" posts in this thread:

http://www.rationalia.com/forum/viewtop ... 22&t=32751

Cain is black, for those not familiar with U.S. politics.

Post by **Warren Dew** » Wed Nov 30, 2011 5:57 am

Schneibster wrote:Am I prejudiced against White people?

I'm sure you're not prejudiced against whites, Schneibster.

Post by **Schneibster** » Wed Nov 30, 2011 6:12 am

Svartalf wrote:You are disparaging short growing plants.

It's a "little Bush." Whadda ya want?

Post by **JimC** » Wed Nov 30, 2011 8:20 am

Warren Dew wrote:All too happy to jump in with unsubstantiated allegations against a rich black man, but when it comes to a rich white man, the charges must have been trumped up, eh, Schneibster?

A rather mean-spirited and inaccurate observation, IMO...

Playing the "hidden racism" card requires either evidence or subtlety...

Neither of which are evident...

Post by **Schneibster** » Wed Nov 30, 2011 8:37 am

Warren Dew wrote:
Schneibster wrote:Am I prejudiced against White people?
I'm sure you're not prejudiced against whites, Schneibster.

You're right. I'm prejudiced against cranks.

Post by **Warren Dew** » Wed Nov 30, 2011 8:52 am

JimC wrote:Playing the "hidden racism" card requires either evidence or subtlety...

I just don't like to see the kind of double standard the two threads represent. The fact is, the evidence against Strauss-Kahn is rather stronger than that against Cain - and the charges are also more severe, being rape and nonconsensual sex rather than harassment and consensual sex. Strauss-Kahn didn't even try to deny the sex, instead using the "it was consensual" excuse typical of sexual assault cases.

Lots of people who don't think they are racist are still all too willing to see black men as sexual predators, while excusing worse behavior in high caste whites.

Post by **JimC** » Wed Nov 30, 2011 9:00 am

Warren Dew wrote:
JimC wrote:Playing the "hidden racism" card requires either evidence or subtlety...
I just don't like to see the kind of double standard the two threads represent. The fact is, the evidence against Strauss-Kahn is rather stronger than that against Cain - and the charges are also more severe, being rape and nonconsensual sex rather than harassment and consensual sex. Strauss-Kahn didn't even try to deny the sex, instead using the "it was consensual" excuse typical of sexual assault cases.

Lots of people who don't think they are racist are still all too willing to see black men as sexual predators, while excusing worse behavior in high caste whites.

The last sentence may well have some truth in it, but there is no evidence it applies to Da Schneib...

Post by **Svartalf** » Wed Nov 30, 2011 9:04 am

drew.
DSK is a whatever-can't-keep-iy-in-his-pants ...
what I don't believe about him is that he'd do sommething as stupid, senseless, and let's say it, insane, as what he's accused of, right when he was poised to be France's next president.

Post by **Tyrannical** » Wed Nov 30, 2011 9:46 am

How do Socialists put up with corrupt crooks like Strauss-Kahn? I thought Socialism was about putting the common worker first? He lives like a fat cat capitalist on the public dime, that behavior should be demonized by "socialists"

Post by **Schneibster** » Wed Nov 30, 2011 12:10 pm

Warren Dew wrote:
JimC wrote:Playing the "hidden racism" card requires either evidence or subtlety...
I just don't like to see the kind of double standard the two threads represent.

Bullshit. You're a conservatroid and you don't like seeing Cain dissed, but this guy's fair game 'cause he's white and "librul."

Post by **Schneibster** » Wed Nov 30, 2011 12:11 pm

Tyrannical wrote:How do Socialists put up with corrupt crooks like Strauss-Kahn? I thought Socialism was about putting the common worker first? He lives like a fat cat capitalist on the public dime, that behavior should be demonized by "socialists"

Now there's an unbiased post.

Post by **Tyrannical** » Wed Nov 30, 2011 2:07 pm

Schneibster wrote:
Tyrannical wrote:How do Socialists put up with corrupt crooks like Strauss-Kahn? I thought Socialism was about putting the common worker first? He lives like a fat cat capitalist on the public dime, that behavior should be demonized by "socialists"
Now there's an unbiased post.

What? He sure doesn't live like the common man. Let's just say he has expensive tastes, something that should be unbecoming to a socialist. Especially when some of that is done on the IMF dime, which is eventually comes out of the tax payer's pocket.
I don't care if I hit the lottery, spending over $2K a night on a hotel suite would make me ill

rationalia.com

Strauss-Kahn Set Up?

Re: Strauss-Kahn Set Up?

Re: Strauss-Kahn Set Up?

Re: Strauss-Kahn Set Up?

Re: Strauss-Kahn Set Up?

Re: Strauss-Kahn Set Up?

Re: Strauss-Kahn Set Up?

Re: Strauss-Kahn Set Up?

Re: Strauss-Kahn Set Up?

Re: Strauss-Kahn Set Up?

Re: Strauss-Kahn Set Up?

Re: Strauss-Kahn Set Up?

Re: Strauss-Kahn Set Up?

Re: Strauss-Kahn Set Up?

Re: Strauss-Kahn Set Up?

Re: Strauss-Kahn Set Up?

Who is online