Lyin' Ass Bitch

[Seth]

Seth, the American Medical Association and the NIH both commented that the HPV vaccine does not cause brain damage. And the HPV vaccine is most effective if it's administered before possible exposure-- i.e.- BEFORE becoming sexually active.

The AMA and the NIH have been wrong before, and it's up to the parent to decide what's best for their child. And if their child is not sexually active, they don't need the vaccine at all, now do they?

They should pass a law saying children can't have sex.

They already have in most places.

Well that, that's handled. Children will not be having sex. The matter is closed.

Insofar as the government is concerned, you are correct. All it has to do now is enforce the law. Otherwise, it's up to the parents to control their children's sexual exposure and behavior, not the government.

[Gallstones]

Insofar as the government is concerned, you are correct. All it has to do now is enforce the law. Otherwise, it's up to the parents to control their children's sexual exposure and behavior, not the government.

Indeed, because it is just so obvious that for millennia parental control has been the most effective method for preventing children being sexually active.

It worked on me....

[Svartalf]

I thought that prospective partner rejection was even more effective than parental control.
I mean, it wasn't parental control that had anything to do with my losing my virginity as late as I did.

[Gawdzilla Sama]

Insofar as the government is concerned, you are correct. All it has to do now is enforce the law. Otherwise, it's up to the parents to control their children's sexual exposure and behavior, not the government.

So, government is stupid. Gotcha.

[Seth]

Insofar as the government is concerned, you are correct. All it has to do now is enforce the law. Otherwise, it's up to the parents to control their children's sexual exposure and behavior, not the government.

Indeed, because it is just so obvious that for millennia parental control has been the most effective method for preventing children being sexually active.

It worked on me....

It's not about parents being effective, it's about government keeping its nose out of the private business of parents and children.

The notion that the government can do things "better" than parents is, first off, a fallacy, and second, is almost never true.

[Seth]

Insofar as the government is concerned, you are correct. All it has to do now is enforce the law. Otherwise, it's up to the parents to control their children's sexual exposure and behavior, not the government.

So, government is stupid. Gotcha.

Well, yes, obviously. And often malicious.

[Gawdzilla Sama]

Insofar as the government is concerned, you are correct. All it has to do now is enforce the law. Otherwise, it's up to the parents to control their children's sexual exposure and behavior, not the government.

So, government is stupid. Gotcha.

Well, yes, obviously. And often malicious.

So children won't have sex because the parents will see to it. Really?

[Seth]

Insofar as the government is concerned, you are correct. All it has to do now is enforce the law. Otherwise, it's up to the parents to control their children's sexual exposure and behavior, not the government.

So, government is stupid. Gotcha.

Well, yes, obviously. And often malicious.

So children won't have sex because the parents will see to it. Really?

Strawman.

[Gawdzilla Sama]

How so? "Otherwise, it's up to the parents to control their children's sexual exposure and behavior, not the government."

[Seth]

How so? "Otherwise, it's up to the parents to control their children's sexual exposure and behavior, not the government."

The question under review was "government is stupid" and my response was "well, yes, obviously. And often malicious."

Your reply, "So children won't have sex because the parents will see to it. Really?" was a non sequitur reforming my argument about the nature of government into a strawman.

[Gawdzilla Sama]

How so? "Otherwise, it's up to the parents to control their children's sexual exposure and behavior, not the government."

The question under review was "government is stupid" and my response was "well, yes, obviously. And often malicious."

Your reply, "So children won't have sex because the parents will see to it. Really?" was a non sequitur reforming my argument about the nature of government into a strawman.

Strawman.

[Svartalf]

Are we gonna have to put a strawman thread next to the "lie, you're a lyin' " one?

[Gawdzilla Sama]

Are we gonna have to put a strawman thread next to the "lie, you're a lyin' " one?

strawman.

[Svartalf]

Crewel Lye

[Gawdzilla Sama]

Crewel Lye

Mary Lee, Wee Rollalong.