EU bans claim that water can prevent dehydration

User avatar
Schneibster
Asker of inconvenient questions
Posts: 3976
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 9:22 pm
About me: I hate cranks.
Location: Late. I'm always late.
Contact:

Re: EU bans claim that water can prevent dehydration

Post by Schneibster » Sat Nov 26, 2011 11:56 am

Coito ergo sum wrote:
Schneibster wrote:
Coito ergo sum wrote:
Schneibster wrote:
Seth wrote: See, I told you, the moment that Schneibster is called on his own lies and bullshit
So there was no financial crisis in 2008?

OK.
Oh, there was, and a huge one.

Neither that, nor Glass Steagell/Graham Leach Bliley have anything much to do with the EU banning claims that water can prevent dehydration.
We're talking about deregulation (of advertising).
We're talking about whether it's a waste of time and money to have a government bother about a claim that water can prevent dehydration. THAT regulation is fucking stupid.
That regulation is truth in advertising. Truth in advertising in the matter of a medical claim, in fact.

So you're arguing that regulating medical claims is fucking stupid.

OK. Guess you're "down with" homeopathy.
Coito ergo sum wrote:
Schneibster wrote: My point was we already tried that (Graham-Leach-Bliley). It was a disaster (2008 financial crisis).
That's not what is going on in the water bottle thing.
Financial claim ≅ medical claim
Regulating banks is fucking stupid ≅ regulating medical claims is fucking stupid
Financial crisis ≅ someone dies
Looks like what's going on to me. Where's your evidence?
Coito ergo sum wrote:The government still has the power to regulate product labeling and does.
They are. You're whining about it. Duh.
Coito ergo sum wrote:We're just talking about whether it's a good idea for them specifically to ban the claim that water can prevent dehydration.
So basically they should regulate labeling without actually asking doctors whether a particular claim is true or not? You're in favor of medically ignorant politicians making decisions about what's medically true? Really? Fascinating.
Coito ergo sum wrote:Nobody has made the claim that there should be no regulation of labeling at all.
You're the one whining about it. Am I supposed to ignore you? :dunno:
Coito ergo sum wrote:
Schneibster wrote:Therefore Libertardian arguments blaming regulations are in general bullshit and need to be viewed extremely critically considering the catastrophe they caused last time.
This is a red herring. "The last time?" That's not "the last time."
No, it's hyperbole. But not by much, as I showed above with the equivalence of financial and medical.

Try again. This was a fail.
Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts. -Daniel Patrick Moynihan
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. -Thomas Jefferson
Image

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests