Cowards!

[Schneibster]

Sarah Palin was booed when she trotted her daughter out with her at a hockey game while campaigning for VP.

Sarah Palin was the candidate, not the candidate's SO.

When did they boo Todd?

Just askin'.

When did Todd show up to stump for some initiative he was pushing?

Changing the subject. Answer the question.

[mozg]

Sarah Palin was booed when she trotted her daughter out with her at a hockey game while campaigning for VP.

Sarah Palin was the candidate, not the candidate's SO.

When did they boo Todd?

Just askin'.

When did Todd show up to stump for some initiative he was pushing?

Changing the subject. Answer the question.

Not at all. I am simply asking for apples to apples comparison. Todd Palin did not stump for his own political cause. He never built himself a platform and then traveled around trying to rally support for it as Michelle Obama does. She wanted in the game, let her live with how it's played.

[Schneibster]

Changing the subject. Answer the question.

Not at all.

Lie. Answer the question.

[mozg]

Changing the subject. Answer the question.

Not at all.

Lie. Answer the question.

Lie? Prove it.

[Schneibster]

Changing the subject. Answer the question.

Not at all.

Lie. Answer the question.

Lie? Prove it.

You didn't answer the question. Still haven't. Proof complete.

[mozg]

You didn't answer the question. Still haven't. Proof complete.

That's not proof of anything. You have yet to ask me a relevant question.

Michelle Obama is politicking in her own right, and as such will be responded to either favorably or unfavorably by those crowds she chooses to appear in front of. It has nothing to do with the color of her skin, nor does it make those who jeer her into racists. The idea that just because she has her children with her, nobody is allowed to respond negatively is absurd, but what's worse is that it implies she's using her kids as human shields against criticism.

That's on her, not on the people who boo her. If she's so concerned about her kids not being exposed to such negative reactions, she could always leave them at home when she's out stumping.

[Schneibster]

You didn't answer the question. Still haven't. Proof complete.

That's not proof of anything.

Lie.

C'mon, this is easy. Try harder.

[mozg]

You didn't answer the question. Still haven't. Proof complete.

That's not proof of anything.

Lie.

C'mon, this is easy. Try harder.

Well I would if I had anything to work with, but your arguments leave a hell of a lot to be desired.

[Schneibster]

You didn't answer the question. Still haven't. Proof complete.

That's not proof of anything.

Lie.

C'mon, this is easy. Try harder.

Well I would if I had anything to work with, but your arguments leave a hell of a lot to be desired.

You can't answer them. Instead you're trying to get out of answering them, and distract everyone's attention from it.

[sandinista]

Hey mozg stop feeding the trolls.

[Schneibster]

So glad you agree with me on so many subjects, Sandi. Please feel free to keep posing agreements on all the threads I post on. It will boost my cred. Thanks!

[mozg]

Well I would if I had anything to work with, but your arguments leave a hell of a lot to be desired.

You can't answer them. Instead you're trying to get out of answering them, and distract everyone's attention from it.

[/quote]

Your question isn't relevant for the reasons already stated. If you have anything that is, I suggest you put it up. Why don't you tell me why someone who is not a political figure in his own right should be held up against someone who has clearly entered the political arena of her own volition for comparison?

There's no 'trying to get out of' anything here. I asserted that people who go out politicking for their own pet issues are fair targets for both cheers and jeers. Todd Palin is completely, utterly irrelevant to that assertion because he does not go out politicking for his own pet issues.

Your repeated refrain of 'Answer the question' is exactly like that of a creationist whose entire argument boils down to repeating 'Then explain what happened before the Big Bang.' as if that has anything whatsoever to do with the factual veracity of evolution.

Now, since I know you're going to not even read beyond the first three words and just parrot some form of 'Lie. Answer the question' again, this post is actually for anyone else who might be reading this thread and not yet have picked up on why you're the one derailing any ability for there to be a rational discussion within it.

[sandinista]

It will boost my cred.

hate to break it to you, but you have no "cred".

[Schneibster]

Your question isn't relevant for the reasons already stated.

Lie. And more squid ink.

Answer the question.

Try not to get so butthurt you fuck up the quotes.

[mozg]

Does anybody have an opinion on whether or not it's bigotry to assume that NASCAR fans are uneducated and low-class racists who hate Michelle Obama because she's black?