New Study: Deccan, not Chicxulub, Killed Dinos

User avatar
Schneibster
Asker of inconvenient questions
Posts: 3976
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 9:22 pm
About me: I hate cranks.
Location: Late. I'm always late.
Contact:

Re: New Study: Deccan, not Chicxulub, Killed Dinos

Post by Schneibster » Fri Nov 18, 2011 3:27 pm

Gawdzilla wrote:Anybody care to speculate on how long the "nuclear winter" was, if it happened? If the planet was in trouble from the Deccan, the asteroid impact would make it worse. Same thing if the sequence is reversed. So a nuclear winter would be bad, but for how long.

My guess is less that three years, because that's how long the reptilians that survived would be able to hibernate.
Estimates I've read on the impact event are in decades; phase II of the Deccan Traps eruptions went on for thirty thousand plus years.
Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts. -Daniel Patrick Moynihan
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. -Thomas Jefferson
Image

User avatar
Faithfree
The Potable Atheist
Posts: 16173
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 11:58 am
About me: All things in moderation, including moderation
Location: Planet of the grapes
Contact:

Re: New Study: Deccan, not Chicxulub, Killed Dinos

Post by Faithfree » Fri Nov 18, 2011 3:33 pm

Schneibster wrote:
Faithfree wrote:Why doesn't it surprise me that Gerta Keller is involved. :fp2:

I should explain that in a previous life in academia I did lots of research on impact-related stuff and got very familiar with the K-T mass extinction, although I didn't work on that specifically. I think impact as the main cause is a very water tight case, but of course I'm always open to new evidence so it would be interesting to read the actual paper rather than the media hype. The debate about the involvement of the Decan Traps has been very long, very tedious, and previously always toothless, but I'd like to see what the new paper has to offer. Though I doubt I'll be convinced.
The evidence sounds pretty good in this case. There are and have always been timing problems between the Chicxulub event and the beginning of the extinction event in the geological record. And the study of plankton is pretty definitive that there were big problems for a much longer time than the single asteroid strike can explain.

Time for bed now, but I'll post some comments to this tomorrow.
Although it may look like a forum, this site is actually a crowd-sourced science project modelling the slow but inexorable heat death of the universe.

User avatar
Schneibster
Asker of inconvenient questions
Posts: 3976
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 9:22 pm
About me: I hate cranks.
Location: Late. I'm always late.
Contact:

Re: New Study: Deccan, not Chicxulub, Killed Dinos

Post by Schneibster » Fri Nov 18, 2011 3:54 pm

Dream well.
Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts. -Daniel Patrick Moynihan
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. -Thomas Jefferson
Image

User avatar
Mysturji
Clint Eastwood
Posts: 5005
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 4:08 pm
About me: Downloading an app to my necktop
Location: http://tinyurl.com/c9o35ny
Contact:

Re: New Study: Deccan, not Chicxulub, Killed Dinos

Post by Mysturji » Fri Nov 18, 2011 4:09 pm

Is it just me, or does anyone else read "Chicxulub" and think "Chick's Club"? :shifty:
Sir Figg Newton wrote:If I have seen further than others, it is only because I am surrounded by midgets.
Cormac wrote:Doom predictors have been with humans right through our history. They are like the proverbial stopped clock - right twice a day, but not due to the efficacy of their prescience.
IDMD2
I am a twit.

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74174
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: New Study: Deccan, not Chicxulub, Killed Dinos

Post by JimC » Sat Nov 19, 2011 7:46 am

Mysturji wrote:Is it just me, or does anyone else read "Chicxulub" and think "Chick's Club"? :shifty:
It's just you, Pervert! :lay:
Don't Panic wrote:
JimC wrote:
Schneibster wrote:
Don't Panic wrote:Anyone put out the theory that the impact caused the eruptions?
I don't think it's big enough.

ETA: IIRC the timing's right, though. Chicxulub happened before the second phase of Deccan I think. Part of the problem with associating it directly with the KT boundary is that it's a few hundred thousand years too early.
I'm sure I've read an account in NewScientist that suggested that the impact may have triggered a phase of Deccan, in the sense that if the magma build up was almost ready to blow, the impact could have tipped the balance...
I was thinking that it's pretty much the other side of the world, shock waves hitting a weak point from multiple directions at once.
That was my memory of the speculation I read in NewScientist, a sort of focussing of the waves...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41047
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: New Study: Deccan, not Chicxulub, Killed Dinos

Post by Svartalf » Sat Nov 19, 2011 10:09 am

Don't Panic wrote:Anyone put out the theory that the impact caused the eruptions?
Feels weird... I might go with such an impact triggering major seismic/volcanic activity in its area... but it triggering the same half a wold away... if the impact had been that strong, it's surprising anything multicellular would have survived.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
Horwood Beer-Master
"...a complete Kentish hog"
Posts: 7061
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 2:34 pm
Location: Wandering somewhere around the Darenth Valley - Kent
Contact:

Re: New Study: Deccan, not Chicxulub, Killed Dinos

Post by Horwood Beer-Master » Sat Nov 19, 2011 10:11 am

JimC wrote:
Mysturji wrote:Is it just me, or does anyone else read "Chicxulub" and think "Chick's Club"? :shifty:
It's just you, Pervert! :lay:
Don't Panic wrote:
JimC wrote:
Schneibster wrote:
Don't Panic wrote:Anyone put out the theory that the impact caused the eruptions?
I don't think it's big enough.

ETA: IIRC the timing's right, though. Chicxulub happened before the second phase of Deccan I think. Part of the problem with associating it directly with the KT boundary is that it's a few hundred thousand years too early.
I'm sure I've read an account in NewScientist that suggested that the impact may have triggered a phase of Deccan, in the sense that if the magma build up was almost ready to blow, the impact could have tipped the balance...
I was thinking that it's pretty much the other side of the world, shock waves hitting a weak point from multiple directions at once.
That was my memory of the speculation I read in NewScientist, a sort of focussing of the waves...
Was Deccan on the other side of the world when Chicxulub occurred?
Image

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41047
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: New Study: Deccan, not Chicxulub, Killed Dinos

Post by Svartalf » Sat Nov 19, 2011 10:18 am

Merka used to be affixed to the Western side of Pangea, and had already drifted a pretty way away from it by the time the KT event happened, so, yep, even then, India was about as far as you could be from Chicxulub at those latitude levels.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
Horwood Beer-Master
"...a complete Kentish hog"
Posts: 7061
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 2:34 pm
Location: Wandering somewhere around the Darenth Valley - Kent
Contact:

Re: New Study: Deccan, not Chicxulub, Killed Dinos

Post by Horwood Beer-Master » Sat Nov 19, 2011 11:13 am

Svartalf wrote:Merka used to be affixed to the Western side of Pangea, and had already drifted a pretty way away from it by the time the KT event happened, so, yep, even then, India was about as far as you could be from Chicxulub at those latitude levels.
So were they in fact antipodes? :ask:
Image

User avatar
Faithfree
The Potable Atheist
Posts: 16173
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 11:58 am
About me: All things in moderation, including moderation
Location: Planet of the grapes
Contact:

Re: New Study: Deccan, not Chicxulub, Killed Dinos

Post by Faithfree » Sat Nov 19, 2011 1:07 pm

Horwood Beer-Master wrote:
Svartalf wrote:Merka used to be affixed to the Western side of Pangea, and had already drifted a pretty way away from it by the time the KT event happened, so, yep, even then, India was about as far as you could be from Chicxulub at those latitude levels.
So were they in fact antipodes? :ask:
Not exactly, at the end of the Cretaceous the antipode of Chicxulub would have been just off the NW coast of Australia. In any case, the Decan Traps started erupting before the Chicxulub impact so there can be no cause-and-effect. Can't remember the reference, but there are dinosaur bones, eggs etc preserved in the sediments deposited between individual flows of the Decan Traps, so the dinos were doing well living between eruptions up until the extinction.
Although it may look like a forum, this site is actually a crowd-sourced science project modelling the slow but inexorable heat death of the universe.

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: New Study: Deccan, not Chicxulub, Killed Dinos

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Sat Nov 19, 2011 1:08 pm

Schneibster wrote:
Gawdzilla wrote:Anybody care to speculate on how long the "nuclear winter" was, if it happened? If the planet was in trouble from the Deccan, the asteroid impact would make it worse. Same thing if the sequence is reversed. So a nuclear winter would be bad, but for how long.

My guess is less that three years, because that's how long the reptilians that survived would be able to hibernate.
Estimates I've read on the impact event are in decades; phase II of the Deccan Traps eruptions went on for thirty thousand plus years.
I'm good with that time period, but not with the E.L.E. being nearly that long. If the volcanism had produced lethal conditions for 30K years what life other than that around the black smokers would have survived, especially the large lizards that we know continued on afterwards?
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
Faithfree
The Potable Atheist
Posts: 16173
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 11:58 am
About me: All things in moderation, including moderation
Location: Planet of the grapes
Contact:

Re: New Study: Deccan, not Chicxulub, Killed Dinos

Post by Faithfree » Sat Nov 19, 2011 1:15 pm

Don't Panic wrote:Anyone put out the theory that the impact caused the eruptions?
In this case there can't be a connection because the eruptions started some time (can't remember exactly, but perhaps a million years or so) before the extinction. But the idea of huge impacts triggering episodes of volcanic eruptions is a popular idea, particularly among the fringe of the impact research community.
Although it may look like a forum, this site is actually a crowd-sourced science project modelling the slow but inexorable heat death of the universe.

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: New Study: Deccan, not Chicxulub, Killed Dinos

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Sat Nov 19, 2011 1:17 pm

FF are you familiar with the claims about Hudson's Bay having an impact crater that killed off the megafauna, mammoths, mastodons, etc.?
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
Faithfree
The Potable Atheist
Posts: 16173
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 11:58 am
About me: All things in moderation, including moderation
Location: Planet of the grapes
Contact:

Re: New Study: Deccan, not Chicxulub, Killed Dinos

Post by Faithfree » Sat Nov 19, 2011 1:31 pm

Gawdzilla wrote:FF are you familiar with the claims about Hudson's Bay having an impact crater that killed off the megafauna, mammoths, mastodons, etc.?
Yep, the idea that Hudson Bay is a huge crater has been around for a long time - I think at least since the 1960s. The very circular nature of arc is the reason for the speculation. But no one have found any actual evidence - like shock metamorphosed rocks.
Although it may look like a forum, this site is actually a crowd-sourced science project modelling the slow but inexorable heat death of the universe.

User avatar
Don't Panic
Evil Admin
Evil Admin
Posts: 10653
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:19 am
About me: 100% Pure Evil. (Not from Concentrate)
Location: Luimneach, Eire
Contact:

New Study: Deccan, not Chicxulub, Killed Dinos

Post by Don't Panic » Sat Nov 19, 2011 3:09 pm

Faithfree wrote:
Don't Panic wrote:Anyone put out the theory that the impact caused the eruptions?
In this case there can't be a connection because the eruptions started some time (can't remember exactly, but perhaps a million years or so) before the extinction. But the idea of huge impacts triggering episodes of volcanic eruptions is a popular idea, particularly among the fringe of the impact research community.
I'm making a few assumptions that molten rock is pretty incompressible, and a large impact is similar to a detonation, that would generate a pressure wave radiating away from the point of impact, any weak spots, like where tectonic plates meet would provide an outlet for that pressure.
Gawd wrote:»
And those Zumwalts are already useless, they can be taken out with an ICBM.
The world is a thing of utter inordinate complexity and richness and strangeness that is absolutely awesome. I mean the idea that such complexity can arise not only out of such simplicity, but probably absolutely out of nothing, is the most fabulous extraordinary idea. And once you get some kind of inkling of how that might have happened, it's just wonderful. And . . . the opportunity to spend 70 or 80 years of your life in such a universe is time well spent as far as I am concerned.
D.N.A.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests