Our Dear Friends

User avatar
Hermit
Posts: 25806
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
About me: Cantankerous grump
Location: Ignore lithpt
Contact:

Our Dear Friends

Post by Hermit » Sat Nov 19, 2011 3:34 am

Having liberated Afghanistan's and Iraq's oppressed masses, we seem to have run out of countries to free. Saudi Arabia can never be considered to be socially and politically oppressive, can it? If it was particularly unjust to women why is half of its population female? I mean, wouldn't they just move out if they did not like living there? Oh, that's right; they can't move. Not even to a hospital. Women driving means prostitution, pornography, homosexuality and divorce: Saudi.

Then there is Egypt. Now that Mubarak has been toppled, it's the land of milk and honey. For men. Female student’s naked posts tear the veil from face of secular Egypt. Aliaa Magda Elmahdy's blog entry has attracted close to three million views in four weeks. Most of the comments are negative. Even her country's so called liberals are disassociating themselves from her. Whatever government emerges after the upcoming elections, Egypt's future looks rosy. Nothing to worry about. With the possible exceptions of Pakistan and Iraq, the world police has Islamic oppression in check all over the world.

[/dummyspit]
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould

User avatar
Schneibster
Asker of inconvenient questions
Posts: 3976
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 9:22 pm
About me: I hate cranks.
Location: Late. I'm always late.
Contact:

Re: Our Dear Friends

Post by Schneibster » Sat Nov 19, 2011 4:03 am

Turkey might make you feel better. They got past the military thing OK.

I suspect the Egyptian military means to follow their example. I think it's a pretty good one.

Commerce and acculturation will win out in the long run; the Enlightenment proved that.

The other choice is to kill all the ones who are devoted to the old ways. I've studied a lot of history and I've never seen that work.

In science you usually have to wait them out.
Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts. -Daniel Patrick Moynihan
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. -Thomas Jefferson
Image

User avatar
hadespussercats
I've come for your pants.
Posts: 18586
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 12:27 am
About me: Looks pretty good, coming out of the back of his neck like that.
Location: Gotham
Contact:

Re: Our Dear Friends

Post by hadespussercats » Sat Nov 19, 2011 4:11 am

Seraph wrote:Having liberated Afghanistan's and Iraq's oppressed masses, we seem to have run out of countries to free. Saudi Arabia can never be considered to be socially and politically oppressive, can it? If it was particularly unjust to women why is half of its population female? I mean, wouldn't they just move out if they did not like living there? Oh, that's right; they can't move. Not even to a hospital. Women driving means prostitution, pornography, homosexuality and divorce: Saudi.

Then there is Egypt. Now that Mubarak has been toppled, it's the land of milk and honey. For men. Female student’s naked posts tear the veil from face of secular Egypt. Aliaa Magda Elmahdy's blog entry has attracted close to three million views in four weeks. Most of the comments are negative. Even her country's so called liberals are disassociating themselves from her. Whatever government emerges after the upcoming elections, Egypt's future looks rosy. Nothing to worry about. With the possible exceptions of Pakistan and Iraq, the world police has Islamic oppression in check all over the world.

[/dummyspit]
Did we really liberate Afghanistan and Iraq's oppressed masses? I know we trashed the place, but are they now free?

I can't tell if that part was meant to be sardonic.

Can social media free us all? Blogging our way to emancipation?
The green careening planet
spins blindly in the dark
so close to annihilation.

Listen. No one listens. Meow.

User avatar
Hermit
Posts: 25806
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
About me: Cantankerous grump
Location: Ignore lithpt
Contact:

Re: Our Dear Friends

Post by Hermit » Sat Nov 19, 2011 4:31 am

hadespussercats wrote:Did we really liberate Afghanistan and Iraq's oppressed masses? I know we trashed the place, but are they now free?

I can't tell if that part was meant to be sardonic.

Can social media free us all? Blogging our way to emancipation?
Good questions. Yes, I was being sardonic. The social media are a very minor factor contributing to change, but I think they are of some consequence, especially since the internet went mainstream. In pre-internet times social media hastened the end of the Vietnam war and South Africa's apartheid regime. Mostly, factors for change are not really under our control. Schneibster is right with his observation that "Commerce and acculturation will win out in the long run; the Enlightenment proved that." What infuriates me, though, is that more often than not "liberation" is a noble sounding label to disguise actions motivated by cynical Realpolitik. Why have we not "liberated" Pakistan? Or Somalia the way we have "liberated" Afghanistan and Iraq?
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74293
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Our Dear Friends

Post by JimC » Sat Nov 19, 2011 4:57 am

Seraph wrote:
hadespussercats wrote:Did we really liberate Afghanistan and Iraq's oppressed masses? I know we trashed the place, but are they now free?

I can't tell if that part was meant to be sardonic.

Can social media free us all? Blogging our way to emancipation?
Good questions. Yes, I was being sardonic. The social media are a very minor factor contributing to change, but I think they are of some consequence, especially since the internet went mainstream. In pre-internet times social media hastened the end of the Vietnam war and South Africa's apartheid regime. Mostly, factors for change are not really under our control. Schneibster is right with his observation that "Commerce and acculturation will win out in the long run; the Enlightenment proved that." What infuriates me, though, is that more often than not "liberation" is a noble sounding label to disguise actions motivated by cynical Realpolitik. Why have we not "liberated" Pakistan? Or Somalia the way we have "liberated" Afghanistan and Iraq?
I agree in the main, but your last point is unrealistic. Afghanistan was not about liberating people from an opressive Taliban regime (allthough it provides good spin at times), but attacking on a regime which sponsored and assisted massive terrorist attacks against the west, and was quite open about it.

My cynical side says that, in the near to medium term, when the west pulls out and the current corrupt regime is toppled by a resurgent Taliban, they will make the wise move of making it very clear that they will have nothing more to do with terrorist attacks against the west outside of their own country. They will be left alone to fester in their unpleasant, mysogynist fairyland...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
hadespussercats
I've come for your pants.
Posts: 18586
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 12:27 am
About me: Looks pretty good, coming out of the back of his neck like that.
Location: Gotham
Contact:

Re: Our Dear Friends

Post by hadespussercats » Sat Nov 19, 2011 5:03 am

Seraph wrote:
hadespussercats wrote:Did we really liberate Afghanistan and Iraq's oppressed masses? I know we trashed the place, but are they now free?

I can't tell if that part was meant to be sardonic.

Can social media free us all? Blogging our way to emancipation?
Good questions. Yes, I was being sardonic. The social media are a very minor factor contributing to change, but I think they are of some consequence, especially since the internet went mainstream. In pre-internet times social media hastened the end of the Vietnam war and South Africa's apartheid regime. Mostly, factors for change are not really under our control. Schneibster is right with his observation that "Commerce and acculturation will win out in the long run; the Enlightenment proved that." What infuriates me, though, is that more often than not "liberation" is a noble sounding label to disguise actions motivated by cynical Realpolitik. Why have we not "liberated" Pakistan? Or Somalia the way we have "liberated" Afghanistan and Iraq?
Do Pakistan or Somalia have oil?

My sense as an ignorant US citizen is that we were never liberating Afghanistan-- we were punishing them for harboring Al Quaeda. Plus maybe some carryover of the cold war hijinx played out there by the US incognito-- but I don't really understand what that was about, either.
The green careening planet
spins blindly in the dark
so close to annihilation.

Listen. No one listens. Meow.

User avatar
Gawd
Posts: 2140
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 7:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Our Dear Friends

Post by Gawd » Sat Nov 19, 2011 5:09 am

hadespussercats wrote:
Seraph wrote:
hadespussercats wrote:Did we really liberate Afghanistan and Iraq's oppressed masses? I know we trashed the place, but are they now free?

I can't tell if that part was meant to be sardonic.

Can social media free us all? Blogging our way to emancipation?
Good questions. Yes, I was being sardonic. The social media are a very minor factor contributing to change, but I think they are of some consequence, especially since the internet went mainstream. In pre-internet times social media hastened the end of the Vietnam war and South Africa's apartheid regime. Mostly, factors for change are not really under our control. Schneibster is right with his observation that "Commerce and acculturation will win out in the long run; the Enlightenment proved that." What infuriates me, though, is that more often than not "liberation" is a noble sounding label to disguise actions motivated by cynical Realpolitik. Why have we not "liberated" Pakistan? Or Somalia the way we have "liberated" Afghanistan and Iraq?
Do Pakistan or Somalia have oil?

My sense as an ignorant US citizen is that we were never liberating Afghanistan-- we were punishing them for harboring Al Quaeda. Plus maybe some carryover of the cold war hijinx played out there by the US incognito-- but I don't really understand what that was about, either.
If punishment for aiding Al Quaeda is really the case, the the US would have bombed Saudi Arabia instead.

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74293
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Our Dear Friends

Post by JimC » Sat Nov 19, 2011 5:12 am

Gawd wrote:
hadespussercats wrote:
Seraph wrote:
hadespussercats wrote:Did we really liberate Afghanistan and Iraq's oppressed masses? I know we trashed the place, but are they now free?

I can't tell if that part was meant to be sardonic.

Can social media free us all? Blogging our way to emancipation?
Good questions. Yes, I was being sardonic. The social media are a very minor factor contributing to change, but I think they are of some consequence, especially since the internet went mainstream. In pre-internet times social media hastened the end of the Vietnam war and South Africa's apartheid regime. Mostly, factors for change are not really under our control. Schneibster is right with his observation that "Commerce and acculturation will win out in the long run; the Enlightenment proved that." What infuriates me, though, is that more often than not "liberation" is a noble sounding label to disguise actions motivated by cynical Realpolitik. Why have we not "liberated" Pakistan? Or Somalia the way we have "liberated" Afghanistan and Iraq?
Do Pakistan or Somalia have oil?

My sense as an ignorant US citizen is that we were never liberating Afghanistan-- we were punishing them for harboring Al Quaeda. Plus maybe some carryover of the cold war hijinx played out there by the US incognito-- but I don't really understand what that was about, either.
If punishment for aiding Al Quaeda is really the case, the the US would have bombed Saudi Arabia instead.
Fair point in many ways, Gawd, but it ignores the Realpolitik of the situation in terms of regional alliances and oil...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
hadespussercats
I've come for your pants.
Posts: 18586
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 12:27 am
About me: Looks pretty good, coming out of the back of his neck like that.
Location: Gotham
Contact:

Re: Our Dear Friends

Post by hadespussercats » Sat Nov 19, 2011 5:19 am

JimC wrote:
Gawd wrote:
hadespussercats wrote:
Seraph wrote:
hadespussercats wrote:Did we really liberate Afghanistan and Iraq's oppressed masses? I know we trashed the place, but are they now free?

I can't tell if that part was meant to be sardonic.

Can social media free us all? Blogging our way to emancipation?
Good questions. Yes, I was being sardonic. The social media are a very minor factor contributing to change, but I think they are of some consequence, especially since the internet went mainstream. In pre-internet times social media hastened the end of the Vietnam war and South Africa's apartheid regime. Mostly, factors for change are not really under our control. Schneibster is right with his observation that "Commerce and acculturation will win out in the long run; the Enlightenment proved that." What infuriates me, though, is that more often than not "liberation" is a noble sounding label to disguise actions motivated by cynical Realpolitik. Why have we not "liberated" Pakistan? Or Somalia the way we have "liberated" Afghanistan and Iraq?
Do Pakistan or Somalia have oil?

My sense as an ignorant US citizen is that we were never liberating Afghanistan-- we were punishing them for harboring Al Quaeda. Plus maybe some carryover of the cold war hijinx played out there by the US incognito-- but I don't really understand what that was about, either.
If punishment for aiding Al Quaeda is really the case, the the US would have bombed Saudi Arabia instead.
Fair point in many ways, Gawd, but it ignores the Realpolitik of the situation in terms of regional alliances and oil...
Gawd and JimC-- this is an exchange I've heard often since 2001. I just wish I knew more about the underpinnings. Does it all really come down to oil, and the rest is head-nodding and diversionary tactics?
The green careening planet
spins blindly in the dark
so close to annihilation.

Listen. No one listens. Meow.

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74293
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Our Dear Friends

Post by JimC » Sat Nov 19, 2011 5:23 am

^^^^^^

It is certainly part of the equation, but not the whole deal, IMO...

The US has always played the alliance game with great fervour. Sometimes it works, sometimes it is ethical, sometimes it is a deal with the devil, but the Great Game must continue... (think Chile...)
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
Warren Dew
Posts: 3781
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:41 pm
Location: Somerville, MA, USA
Contact:

Re: Our Dear Friends

Post by Warren Dew » Sat Nov 19, 2011 5:26 am

Seraph wrote:Then there is Egypt. Now that Mubarak has been toppled, it's the land of milk and honey. For men. Female student’s naked posts tear the veil from face of secular Egypt. Aliaa Magda Elmahdy's blog entry has attracted close to three million views in four weeks. Most of the comments are negative. Even her country's so called liberals are disassociating themselves from her.
As I pointed out at the time, the driving force behind the "Arab Spring" was never a liberal one. Sure there were some liberals participating, but it didn't become powerful until the Islamic fundamentalists threw their weight behind it, scheduling protests after Friday prayers.

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74293
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Our Dear Friends

Post by JimC » Sat Nov 19, 2011 5:29 am

Warren Dew wrote:
Seraph wrote:Then there is Egypt. Now that Mubarak has been toppled, it's the land of milk and honey. For men. Female student’s naked posts tear the veil from face of secular Egypt. Aliaa Magda Elmahdy's blog entry has attracted close to three million views in four weeks. Most of the comments are negative. Even her country's so called liberals are disassociating themselves from her.
As I pointed out at the time, the driving force behind the "Arab Spring" was never a liberal one. Sure there were some liberals participating, but it didn't become powerful until the Islamic fundamentalists threw their weight behind it, scheduling protests after Friday prayers.
I agree, but the liberal youth factions and others are still players. The fundamentalists are not the automatic winners, just possible ones...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
Warren Dew
Posts: 3781
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:41 pm
Location: Somerville, MA, USA
Contact:

Re: Our Dear Friends

Post by Warren Dew » Sat Nov 19, 2011 5:31 am

hadespussercats wrote:Gawd and JimC-- this is an exchange I've heard often since 2001. I just wish I knew more about the underpinnings. Does it all really come down to oil, and the rest is head-nodding and diversionary tactics?
The financing for Al Qaeda came largely from individual Saudis, but on the other hand, there were more Al Qaeda training areas in Afghanistan. The U.S. did actually work on the money half of the equation too, but through the banking system rather than through bombs - arguably a more effective solution.

Of course, if you want to know whether it's all about the oil, peeling it back one layer demonstrates it is not. The reason Arab money was being given to Al Qaeda was in protest of Israel's apartheid policies against the Palestinians, which the U.S. was seen as supporting - fundamentally a human rights issue, not an oil issue. Oil just meant that the Arabs had money to give.

User avatar
Warren Dew
Posts: 3781
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:41 pm
Location: Somerville, MA, USA
Contact:

Re: Our Dear Friends

Post by Warren Dew » Sat Nov 19, 2011 5:34 am

JimC wrote:
Warren Dew wrote:
Seraph wrote:Then there is Egypt. Now that Mubarak has been toppled, it's the land of milk and honey. For men. Female student’s naked posts tear the veil from face of secular Egypt. Aliaa Magda Elmahdy's blog entry has attracted close to three million views in four weeks. Most of the comments are negative. Even her country's so called liberals are disassociating themselves from her.
As I pointed out at the time, the driving force behind the "Arab Spring" was never a liberal one. Sure there were some liberals participating, but it didn't become powerful until the Islamic fundamentalists threw their weight behind it, scheduling protests after Friday prayers.
I agree, but the liberal youth factions and others are still players. The fundamentalists are not the automatic winners, just possible ones...
Seraph's post is pointing out that the "liberal youth factions" are joining up with the fundamentalists in oppressing women. What we're seeing is a fundamentalist victory in progress.

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74293
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Our Dear Friends

Post by JimC » Sat Nov 19, 2011 5:37 am

Warren Dew wrote:
JimC wrote:
Warren Dew wrote:
Seraph wrote:Then there is Egypt. Now that Mubarak has been toppled, it's the land of milk and honey. For men. Female student’s naked posts tear the veil from face of secular Egypt. Aliaa Magda Elmahdy's blog entry has attracted close to three million views in four weeks. Most of the comments are negative. Even her country's so called liberals are disassociating themselves from her.
As I pointed out at the time, the driving force behind the "Arab Spring" was never a liberal one. Sure there were some liberals participating, but it didn't become powerful until the Islamic fundamentalists threw their weight behind it, scheduling protests after Friday prayers.
I agree, but the liberal youth factions and others are still players. The fundamentalists are not the automatic winners, just possible ones...
Seraph's post is pointing out that the "liberal youth factions" are joining up with the fundamentalists in oppressing women. What we're seeing is a fundamentalist victory in progress.
Perhaps what they are doing is recognising that Egypt is not quite ready for naked Egyptian girls on the internet, and rushing to demonstrate that they are not absurdly out of touch with the Zeitgeist...

(I hasten to add that Egypt should be ready for naked Egyptian girls on the internet...)
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 23 guests