Yes, W Really Was an End Times Crank

[Gawdzilla Sama]

If we all stop doing peace might break out.

[Schneibster]

Always nice to throw a stereotype into a thread like this to show how cool you are.

I believe I noted on another thread that stereotyping is a typical racist activity.

I believe I noted on another thread that the stereotypes fit to a T and Tyrannical called them facts.

Stereotyping is a typical activity of all bigots.

So is special pleading, "No, this time it's TROOOOOOOO!!!!!!"

You yourself are stereotyping with this:

And the typical bigot's next move is "tu quoque."

I'm not advocating blowing them up

Maybe you forgot.

[Gawd]

I'm not advocating blowing them up

Maybe you forgot.

Didn't say anything about blowing them up (though, this does give good insight into what you truly want to do). Said you are bigoted for stereotyping them.

[Schneibster]

I'm not advocating blowing them up

Maybe you forgot.

Didn't say anything about blowing them up

Lie.

[Gawd]

I'm not advocating blowing them up

Maybe you forgot.

Didn't say anything about blowing them up

Lie.

Go find me something where I said you should blow up the Republicans. I'm sure with this delightful insight, Ian will put you on the Homeland Insecurity terrorist list. Freudian slips are the most telling.

[Seth]

Need I point out that Seth has used a racist organization run by supremacists Jews as his first source and Fox News as another source?

I think his claim was made up out of his own head, and he trawled the web to try to back it up.
If that's the best he could dig up, it seems his search actually points to the opposite to what he claimed.

Really? Every source I cited demonstrates that Saddam was deeply involved in supporting international terrorism. That Gawd denies that Saddam supported Palestinian terrorists and characterizes all Jews as "racists" and "supremacists" is hardly surprising but also hardly credible, based on what everyone here knows about him.

Seth, why don't you read up on who created your supremacist Jewish organization and who runs it? Post back what you find.

Red herring. What does that have to do with the accuracy of the claim that Saddam was funding international (and Palestinian) terrorism?

[Seth]

Seth, your sources are rubbish. I'm not going to spend time on them BECAUSE they aren't worth it.
The fact that you met a guy doesn't make him believable. Quite the opposite really.

What Israel say that a Palestinian said under torture is rubbish of arse gravy proportions. As are the rest of the links.

Typical Alinsky-style denials.

If you have a good source, post it. I think you just posted rubbish and hoped nobody would notice.
What's wrong with reality? Why do you have to spice it up?

Your preferred reality has Bush fomenting an "illegal" war without any justification or foundation. This is revisionist nonsense, as every world leader in the Coalition, and a good many other people, including Hillary Clinton, agreed at the time. They all, on the basis of SECRET information that you weren't privy to (some of which, like Georges' claims have since come out), agreed that there was adequate justification to re-invade Iraq and take down Saddam, which is why CONGRESS AUTHORIZED THE INVASION, along with the governments of the Coalition, which included the Blair government. It wasn't Bush's decision along, by any stretch of the fevered-imagination.

It's your perception of reality that's twisted, not the truth. And your reality is twisted because you are so filled with hate towards Bush that your confirmation bias prevents you from rationally assessing any claim that doesn't align with your particular ideology and preconceptions.

[Seth]

Stereotyping is a typical bigoted activity.

Which then begs the question of why you do it so much...

Could it be that you're a.....bigot?

You shave one, is there a resemblance?

Strange you would say that, since I don't shave anyone.

[Schneibster]

I'm not advocating blowing them up

Maybe you forgot.

Didn't say anything about blowing them up

Lie.

Go find me something where I said you should blow up the Republicans.

Lie.

[mistermack]

Seth, your sources are rubbish. I'm not going to spend time on them BECAUSE they aren't worth it.
The fact that you met a guy doesn't make him believable. Quite the opposite really.

What Israel say that a Palestinian said under torture is rubbish of arse gravy proportions. As are the rest of the links.

Typical Alinsky-style denials.

If you have a good source, post it. I think you just posted rubbish and hoped nobody would notice.
What's wrong with reality? Why do you have to spice it up?

Your preferred reality has Bush fomenting an "illegal" war without any justification or foundation. This is revisionist nonsense, as every world leader in the Coalition, and a good many other people, including Hillary Clinton, agreed at the time. They all, on the basis of SECRET information that you weren't privy to (some of which, like Georges' claims have since come out), agreed that there was adequate justification to re-invade Iraq and take down Saddam, which is why CONGRESS AUTHORIZED THE INVASION, along with the governments of the Coalition, which included the Blair government. It wasn't Bush's decision along, by any stretch of the fevered-imagination.

It's your perception of reality that's twisted, not the truth. And your reality is twisted because you are so filled with hate towards Bush that your confirmation bias prevents you from rationally assessing any claim that doesn't align with your particular ideology and preconceptions.

You're full of crap. I made no claim about Bush.
My first post on this thread was to ask where is the verification of the story about Bush.
I just applied the same question to your claim, which I had never heard before.
I can now see why, because you just made it up. Or are you claiming that you know state secrets that we are not allowed to know?
Because if you are, I'm amazed that you're allowed to tell everybody about it on here.
But of course you don't know anything, you just invented it.
Like I said, what's wrong with just sticking to the truth? Why do you have to make things up?
Is there something wrong with you?

[Gawdzilla Sama]

Stereotyping is a typical bigoted activity.

Which then begs the question of why you do it so much...

Could it be that you're a.....bigot?

You shave one, is there a resemblance?

Strange you would say that, since I don't shave anyone.

It keeps your balls cool.

[Seth]

Seth, your sources are rubbish. I'm not going to spend time on them BECAUSE they aren't worth it.
The fact that you met a guy doesn't make him believable. Quite the opposite really.

What Israel say that a Palestinian said under torture is rubbish of arse gravy proportions. As are the rest of the links.

Typical Alinsky-style denials.

If you have a good source, post it. I think you just posted rubbish and hoped nobody would notice.
What's wrong with reality? Why do you have to spice it up?

Your preferred reality has Bush fomenting an "illegal" war without any justification or foundation. This is revisionist nonsense, as every world leader in the Coalition, and a good many other people, including Hillary Clinton, agreed at the time. They all, on the basis of SECRET information that you weren't privy to (some of which, like Georges' claims have since come out), agreed that there was adequate justification to re-invade Iraq and take down Saddam, which is why CONGRESS AUTHORIZED THE INVASION, along with the governments of the Coalition, which included the Blair government. It wasn't Bush's decision along, by any stretch of the fevered-imagination.

It's your perception of reality that's twisted, not the truth. And your reality is twisted because you are so filled with hate towards Bush that your confirmation bias prevents you from rationally assessing any claim that doesn't align with your particular ideology and preconceptions.

You're full of crap. I made no claim about Bush.
My first post on this thread was to ask where is the verification of the story about Bush.
I just applied the same question to your claim, which I had never heard before.
I can now see why, because you just made it up. Or are you claiming that you know state secrets that we are not allowed to know?
Because if you are, I'm amazed that you're allowed to tell everybody about it on here.
But of course you don't know anything, you just invented it.
Like I said, what's wrong with just sticking to the truth? Why do you have to make things up?
Is there something wrong with you?

You don't know what the truth is. You only know what you want the truth to be.

[Gawdzilla Sama]

You don't know what the truth is. You only know what you want the truth to be.

You got a good grip on "the truth", Seeth?