Nuclear Powered Automobiles?

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41047
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: Nuclear Powered Automobiles?

Post by Svartalf » Tue Oct 25, 2011 1:54 pm

Coito ergo sum wrote:http://www.txchnologist.com/2011/the-th ... clear-cars

Thorium lasers: The thoroughly plausible idea for nuclear cars
especially when there's no laser involved in it at all.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
Jason
Destroyer of words
Posts: 17782
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:46 pm
Contact:

Re: Nuclear Powered Automobiles?

Post by Jason » Tue Oct 25, 2011 2:09 pm

Svartalf wrote:
PordFrefect wrote:Actually wood gas combined with fuel cell technology is a viable way to reduce dependency on fossil fuels and greenhouse gas emissions. Considering that it can be made from a broad variety of materials, some of which have little use - such as rice husks, and it produces Biochar which can be used as a fertilizer and for carbon sequestration it is both a renewable fuel source and a way to reduce carbon already in the atmosphere.

It's a modern development of an old idea into a high technology synthesis of several modern developments and advancements in technology. Hardly something to be dismissed out of hand on the false assumption that it is the same technology used in WWII to power one million or more vehicles.
Wood gas... Like the gazognes they used during WWII to compensate the oil penury?
Basically. The concept is the same only the method has been refined, removed from the unit requiring power and centralized. Gasification is performed at central plants on practically any biomass, these plants generate negative CO2 emissions and manufacture syngas for fuel cells that can be used in a wide variety of applications including automobiles.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biochar
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bio-energy ... nd_storage

User avatar
Warren Dew
Posts: 3781
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:41 pm
Location: Somerville, MA, USA
Contact:

Re: Nuclear Powered Automobiles?

Post by Warren Dew » Wed Oct 26, 2011 3:15 am

Coito ergo sum wrote:
The Nuclear Renaissance will probably do much better this time around if the press can learn a little physics and not exaggerate
So much for a new nuclear renaissance.

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74174
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Nuclear Powered Automobiles?

Post by JimC » Wed Oct 26, 2011 9:28 am

The mass of the required shielding makes the idea absurd, even with miniaturisation and ignoring the issue of collisions...

What we need are fusion plants, and electrical storage devices with at least 5 times the energy density of the best current batteries,,,
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
Schneibster
Asker of inconvenient questions
Posts: 3976
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 9:22 pm
About me: I hate cranks.
Location: Late. I'm always late.
Contact:

Re: Nuclear Powered Automobiles?

Post by Schneibster » Wed Oct 26, 2011 9:53 am

JimC wrote:What we need are fusion plants, and electrical storage devices with at least 5 times the energy density of the best current batteries,,,
Ever check out Lawrenceville Plasma Physics, or EMC2, or EEStor?
Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts. -Daniel Patrick Moynihan
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. -Thomas Jefferson
Image

User avatar
Tyrannical
Posts: 6468
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:59 am
Contact:

Re: Nuclear Powered Automobiles?

Post by Tyrannical » Wed Oct 26, 2011 2:18 pm

:fp:
That Italian Andrea Rossi is set to demonstrate his 1MW cold fusion plant in TWO days.
Runs on Nickel powder and Hydrogen, produces heat and copper. It doesn't produce high energy gamma rays (4 inches of lead is plenty), and any radioactive copper isotopes have a very short half life. Reaction dies once Nickel melts (~1500C) so it can never have a serious meltdown.

Fake or real? We'll learn soon.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_Catalyzer
A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.

User avatar
Schneibster
Asker of inconvenient questions
Posts: 3976
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 9:22 pm
About me: I hate cranks.
Location: Late. I'm always late.
Contact:

Re: Nuclear Powered Automobiles?

Post by Schneibster » Wed Oct 26, 2011 2:43 pm

The guys down in San Diego at the Naval Weapons Lab had a pretty good look at cold fusion and I ain't heard shit in five years.

I'll keep an eye on that, but I ain't holdin' my breath.
Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts. -Daniel Patrick Moynihan
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. -Thomas Jefferson
Image

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41047
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: Nuclear Powered Automobiles?

Post by Svartalf » Wed Oct 26, 2011 3:54 pm

Tyrannical wrote::fp:
That Italian Andrea Rossi is set to demonstrate his 1MW cold fusion plant in TWO days.
Runs on Nickel powder and Hydrogen, produces heat and copper. It doesn't produce high energy gamma rays (4 inches of lead is plenty), and any radioactive copper isotopes have a very short half life. Reaction dies once Nickel melts (~1500C) so it can never have a serious meltdown.

Fake or real? We'll learn soon.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_Catalyzer
So I can count on you to tell us on Friday night how it went? my own bet is a fizzle so quiet I won't hear of it even in my fav science news.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests