
(stolen from another thread)
Neither have I.Clinton Huxley wrote:![]()
I'm not sure I've ever seen anybody change their mind about anything, ever. Not on a forum, at least.
Exactly. After all these pages and threads of argumentation about it, you still haven't been convinced by anyone's arguments.Feck wrote:You make the assumption that everyone has already made up their mind about everything that is talked about . I for one don't have a black and white view on firearm ownership .I know the British laws are far too restrictive and I know the American ones seem far too lax but as to an exact position
FBM wrote:Exactly. After all these pages and threads of argumentation about it, you still haven't been convinced by anyone's arguments.Feck wrote:You make the assumption that everyone has already made up their mind about everything that is talked about . I for one don't have a black and white view on firearm ownership .I know the British laws are far too restrictive and I know the American ones seem far too lax but as to an exact position
Are we going to get into an argument over this?
The children too?mistermack wrote:That must be a great comfort to the thirty or forty million killed by the Germans, most of whom were not Nazis. And the vast majority were not evil.Zombie Gawdzilla wrote:This reminds me of the arguments about Germans. Some were Nazis so all were evil. Come on, folks, do we really still buy that line of thinking?
Gee, I didn't know wars did that. Ya learn somethin' new every day.But guns and wars have a habit of enabling nice people to kill other nice people.
Not the bollocks of goodies and baddies that you get in the films.
MrJonno wrote:Not sure we have a SWAT team or equivalent here in the UK,I assume you know of a place where the SWAT or equivalent doesn't carry the most effective firearms to do their jobs, then?
Er, bullshit. If it's not capable of fully-automatic fire, it's not a "sub machinegun" (sic) it's a semi-automatic pistol-caliber carbine or short rifle. And I guarantee you your police tactical and anti-terrorist squads carry real, actual, fully-functional submachine guns.you have some special police units with single shot sub machineguns (automatic is disabled).
Except, of course, the military is not trained for civilian law-enforcement duties and therefore shouldn't be involved short of a declared insurrection or attack from without.In the rare case that more is needed you have the military which even with cuts is more than capable of taking on a few armed criminals
And generally civilian law enforcement isn't routinely trained in the use of deadly force (not here anyway), civilian police can do the negotiating with the bad guys and the army as far are i'm concerned can do the shooting when requested which is basically what happened at the Iranian embassyExcept, of course, the military is not trained for civilian law-enforcement duties and therefore shouldn't be involved short of a declared insurrection or attack from without.
I did.Clinton Huxley wrote:![]()
I'm not sure I've ever seen anybody change their mind about anything, ever. Not on a forum, at least.
Neither are incompatible with each other , only in the US is 'libertarian' associated with right wing politics you are as likely to be left communist-socialist type anywhere elseGallstones wrote:I did.Clinton Huxley wrote:![]()
I'm not sure I've ever seen anybody change their mind about anything, ever. Not on a forum, at least.
I became more libertarian and less socialist.
Svartalf wrote:They'd still have a 3 round bust setting. Submachineguns just are not interesting if they don't have burst or full auto, since that would just make them oversized, cumbersome and heavy pistols.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 22 guests