
http://www.thepoultrysite.com/poultryne ... rries-meps
Less food production = cheaper prices. Why didn't I think of that?MrJonno wrote:Massive overproduction in the western world when it comes to food due to stupid amounts of subsidies, a lot less farmers = cheaper food
Yup less farmers paid not to grow anythingCrumple wrote:Less food production = cheaper prices. Why didn't I think of that?MrJonno wrote:Massive overproduction in the western world when it comes to food due to stupid amounts of subsidies, a lot less farmers = cheaper food
Perhaps it is because of the meat mountains, milk lakes and other surpluses nobody seems to know what to do with making less food production a good thing. We haven't thought of shipping those surpluses off to the starving millions elsewhere for half a century. Why should we start worrying about them now, when we can invent problems for our affluent selves to worry about instead?Crumple wrote:Less food production = cheaper prices. Why didn't I think of that?MrJonno wrote:Massive overproduction in the western world when it comes to food due to stupid amounts of subsidies, a lot less farmers = cheaper food
Europe has not been anywhere near an agrarian system that can be described as over-efficient for decades, and won't be even after half the farming gerontocracy carks it in the next ten or 30 years.Crumple wrote:Surpluses are always preferable to shortages. Over-optimisation is never a good thing in natural systems. It might appear wasteful but there is a certain idiocy in believing it is when the consequence of a over-effecient system stalling is mass starvation.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests